Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jensen Localization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
D |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 05:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 05:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' as entirely PR, none of this actually contains information for a convincing article; thus with nothing even genuinely convincing, there's nothing to accept. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 05:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as entirely PR, none of this actually contains information for a convincing article; thus with nothing even genuinely convincing, there's nothing to accept. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 05:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Not to Delete'''The article is meant to present the historical side of the company and how this company was Pioneer in this area. Please, allow me time to rework it and provide me with the guide on what I am doing wrong, other localization companies are in Wikipedia and not deleted as Lionbridge, could you explain me why is that? |
|||
Revision as of 08:22, 28 August 2016
- Jensen Localization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was referenced by own website, blog, etc. I removed these references and inserted CNs and a warning. These were removed but the new references are not independent of the subject either. Moving to delete. gidonb (talk) 03:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It's a company. They translate stuff. Nothing particularly notable.--Savonneux (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- entirely promotional. No indications of notability nor sufficient RS to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as entirely PR, none of this actually contains information for a convincing article; thus with nothing even genuinely convincing, there's nothing to accept. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not to DeleteThe article is meant to present the historical side of the company and how this company was Pioneer in this area. Please, allow me time to rework it and provide me with the guide on what I am doing wrong, other localization companies are in Wikipedia and not deleted as Lionbridge, could you explain me why is that?