Talk:Ice trade: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Lbertolotti (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Lbertolotti (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. [[User:Hchc2009|Hchc2009]] ([[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]]) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC) |
:If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. [[User:Hchc2009|Hchc2009]] ([[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]]) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
@[[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]] Do you think more people are going to involved in the peer review process? |
@[[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]] Do you think more people are now going to involved in the peer review process? [[User:Lbertolotti|Lbertolotti]] ([[User talk:Lbertolotti|talk]]) 16:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:13, 14 September 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Ice trade has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
Excellent article! Bravo! Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
@talk Do you think more people are now going to involved in the peer review process? Lbertolotti (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- GA-Class Transport articles
- Low-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Norway articles
- Low-importance Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles
- Unassessed Trade articles
- Unknown-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles