Jump to content

Talk:Ice trade: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
:If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. [[User:Hchc2009|Hchc2009]] ([[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]]) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
:If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. [[User:Hchc2009|Hchc2009]] ([[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]]) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


@[[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]] Do you think more people are going to involved in the peer review process?
@[[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]] Do you think more people are now going to involved in the peer review process? [[User:Lbertolotti|Lbertolotti]] ([[User talk:Lbertolotti|talk]]) 16:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 14 September 2016

Good articleIce trade has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

Excellent article! Bravo! Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@talk Do you think more people are now going to involved in the peer review process? Lbertolotti (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]