Talk:Sophie Morgan: Difference between revisions
→Tabloid Journalism: added wiki descriptions |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::::Maybe another editor would be able to help you find better references so you could delete the Tabloid Journalism that abounds in this article! [[User:Transparentfish|Transparentfish]] ([[User talk:Transparentfish|talk]]) 14:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC) |
::::Maybe another editor would be able to help you find better references so you could delete the Tabloid Journalism that abounds in this article! [[User:Transparentfish|Transparentfish]] ([[User talk:Transparentfish|talk]]) 14:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::::There is no "tabloid journalism" in the article; maybe you would be better taking your passive-aggressive snark elsewhere. [[User:Keri|Keri]] ([[User talk:Keri|talk]]) 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC) |
:::::There is no "tabloid journalism" in the article; maybe you would be better taking your passive-aggressive snark elsewhere. [[User:Keri|Keri]] ([[User talk:Keri|talk]]) 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
::::::Keri, you are so defensive! There's no need to resort to personal insults and bullying behaviour. The Daily Express and The Sunday Mail are tabloids by anyone's standards. Better quality sources would improve your re-write.[[User:Transparentfish|Transparentfish]] ([[User talk:Transparentfish|talk]]) 03:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC) |
::::::Keri, you are so defensive! There's no need to resort to personal insults and bullying behaviour. The Daily Express and The Sunday Mail are tabloids by anyone's standards. Indeed, Wikipedia defines them both as such."The Sunday Mail is a Scottish tabloid newspaper published every Sunday". "The Daily Express is a daily national tabloid newspaper in the United Kingdom". Better quality sources would improve your re-write.[[User:Transparentfish|Transparentfish]] ([[User talk:Transparentfish|talk]]) 03:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:56, 21 September 2016
Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Disability Unassessed | |||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sophie Morgan be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
/Archive 1 September 2012-March 2013 |
Neutral point of view
At the time of writing this article is headed with Close Connection template, reading through I find little other than simple factual statements that appear to comply with NPOV guidelines Daffodillman (talk) 11:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. I see no evidence that the article requires a "cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view" that results from edits by people with a "close connection with its subject". It requires some cleanup and sourcing but not because of the material that has been added or removed by editors with a "close connection with its subject". Unless someone can provide actual evidence that demonstrates the validity of the template's presence I will be removing it. Sean.hoyland - talk 13:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Tabloid Journalism
I've pointed out to the editor of this major re-write of an old biographical article that it relies heavily upon refs derived from Tabloid Journalism. She has refused to take them down. The Daily Express, The Mail and The Sunday Mail are surely classic examples of this? The Evening Standard is also questionable. There are many other RSs she could have used. Can anyone help in finding other sources to replace those mentioned? Thanks and kind regards. Transparentfish (talk) 08:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- What are your specific complaints? Off the top of my head I don't recall the Daily Heil being cited at all; The Daily Express, the Glasgow Mail and the LES are cited because they each contain direct interviews with the subject of the article. Your history of editing at this article (and see also [1][2][3]) suggests that you simply do not like any source or any information that does not back up your opinion that Morgan is some vapid, over-privileged non-entity who is being dishonest about her education. Deleting information about her academic studies and simply stating "she didn't complete them, they're irrelevant", for example - based purely on your synthesis of sources and in direct contradiction to quoted sources. (How would she be taking a master's degree without having first completed a batchelor's?) You reappeared after a 2 year absence to attempt to prevent this article being improved - you should take your crusade about "tabloid journalism" to the Kelly Knox article - now that's a doozy. Keri (talk) 08:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Keri for your comments. I still think you could do better than resort to using The Daily Express and The Sunday Mail for your sources. In fact, I always thought that independent sources rather than interviews with the subject themselves were thought more valid on wikipedia? Perhaps you could try to source some independent refs? I am free to edit when and how I choose - I've always thought this article was a mess. Perhaps you could tackle the Kelly Knox article when you've finished here, or at least flag up some of issues you've noted on the talk page as you have chosen to point them out? That would be really helpful. Sorry, not sure what a doozy is ! In terms of Morgan's education, as I understand it from what she's said - she did not complete her BA due to health problems when she was on bed rest for 2 - 3 years. In which time she did an Open University degree in English Literature. Hence she would have been able to apply for a MA. Not at all reliant upon her completing her Fine Art Degree in the circumstances. So according to your sources, she's now a qualified Art Therapist? Perhaps you could add that too to your re-write. Transparentfish (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- You thought wrong. Keri (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe another editor would be able to help you find better references so you could delete the Tabloid Journalism that abounds in this article! Transparentfish (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- There is no "tabloid journalism" in the article; maybe you would be better taking your passive-aggressive snark elsewhere. Keri (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keri, you are so defensive! There's no need to resort to personal insults and bullying behaviour. The Daily Express and The Sunday Mail are tabloids by anyone's standards. Indeed, Wikipedia defines them both as such."The Sunday Mail is a Scottish tabloid newspaper published every Sunday". "The Daily Express is a daily national tabloid newspaper in the United Kingdom". Better quality sources would improve your re-write.Transparentfish (talk) 03:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- There is no "tabloid journalism" in the article; maybe you would be better taking your passive-aggressive snark elsewhere. Keri (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe another editor would be able to help you find better references so you could delete the Tabloid Journalism that abounds in this article! Transparentfish (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- You thought wrong. Keri (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Keri for your comments. I still think you could do better than resort to using The Daily Express and The Sunday Mail for your sources. In fact, I always thought that independent sources rather than interviews with the subject themselves were thought more valid on wikipedia? Perhaps you could try to source some independent refs? I am free to edit when and how I choose - I've always thought this article was a mess. Perhaps you could tackle the Kelly Knox article when you've finished here, or at least flag up some of issues you've noted on the talk page as you have chosen to point them out? That would be really helpful. Sorry, not sure what a doozy is ! In terms of Morgan's education, as I understand it from what she's said - she did not complete her BA due to health problems when she was on bed rest for 2 - 3 years. In which time she did an Open University degree in English Literature. Hence she would have been able to apply for a MA. Not at all reliant upon her completing her Fine Art Degree in the circumstances. So according to your sources, she's now a qualified Art Therapist? Perhaps you could add that too to your re-write. Transparentfish (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Unassessed Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles
- Wikipedia requested images of artists and entertainers
- Articles edited by connected contributors