Jump to content

User talk:GamerMan7799: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:
::: {{reply|92.73.28.106}} - I would recommend using the [[Template:Copyvio]] in the future as it is a little more clear on its deletion and doesn't look like a blanking upon a quick review, like I did. [[User:GamerMan7799|GamerMan7799]] ([[User talk:GamerMan7799#top|talk]]) 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
::: {{reply|92.73.28.106}} - I would recommend using the [[Template:Copyvio]] in the future as it is a little more clear on its deletion and doesn't look like a blanking upon a quick review, like I did. [[User:GamerMan7799|GamerMan7799]] ([[User talk:GamerMan7799#top|talk]]) 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
::::Okay. I'm not a frequent editor and wasn't aware of this. But I wrote a note to the user [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irbox&diff=740561797&oldid=740160843], hoping that he will stop it. --[[Special:Contributions/92.73.28.106|92.73.28.106]] ([[User talk:92.73.28.106|talk]]) 21:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
::::Okay. I'm not a frequent editor and wasn't aware of this. But I wrote a note to the user [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irbox&diff=740561797&oldid=740160843], hoping that he will stop it. --[[Special:Contributions/92.73.28.106|92.73.28.106]] ([[User talk:92.73.28.106|talk]]) 21:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
:::::He deleted my note on his talk page and reverts my removals of the copyvios. I first thought he just wouldn't know that he is doing something wrong, but I was probably wrong. --[[Special:Contributions/92.73.28.106|92.73.28.106]] ([[User talk:92.73.28.106|talk]]) 21:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:13, 21 September 2016

December 2012

Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bing because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Hammersoft (talk) 22:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Before you revert things you should look at the changes. I'm removing copyright violations and add the source of the original (if it is not already given as "source" in the article). So if you think a removal is incorrect, explain why. --92.73.28.106 (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@92.73.28.106: I see how this can go both ways. When I was reviewing your edits, I chose to revert because it seemed like you were blanking valid sections without adequate reason. I do not know enough about the topic to argue against their deletion upon closer review, so if you delete them again, I won't revert it. However, you should make clear the reason why you are deleting something in your summary. GamerMan7799 (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I had made it clear. Problem being that there are so many copyvios of this user that it takes some time to remove them. --92.73.28.106 (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@92.73.28.106: - I would recommend using the Template:Copyvio in the future as it is a little more clear on its deletion and doesn't look like a blanking upon a quick review, like I did. GamerMan7799 (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I'm not a frequent editor and wasn't aware of this. But I wrote a note to the user [1], hoping that he will stop it. --92.73.28.106 (talk) 21:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He deleted my note on his talk page and reverts my removals of the copyvios. I first thought he just wouldn't know that he is doing something wrong, but I was probably wrong. --92.73.28.106 (talk) 21:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]