Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Ghilascu: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
||
:{{la|Natalia Ghilascu}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Ghilascu|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September |
:{{la|Natalia Ghilascu}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Ghilascu|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 23#{{anchorencode:Natalia Ghilascu}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natalia_Ghilascu Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Natalia Ghilascu}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Natalia Ghilascu}}) |
||
Aside from one interview that isn't really quotable, I'm really not seeing anything in the way of significant coverage in independent sources. There are some passing mentions, and then there are websites of organizations, or blurbs written by entities affiliated with the subject, and things of that nature. So as far as I can tell, the subject fails [[WP:BASIC]]. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 19:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC) |
Aside from one interview that isn't really quotable, I'm really not seeing anything in the way of significant coverage in independent sources. There are some passing mentions, and then there are websites of organizations, or blurbs written by entities affiliated with the subject, and things of that nature. So as far as I can tell, the subject fails [[WP:BASIC]]. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 19:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 01:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Natalia Ghilascu]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 01:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Natalia Ghilascu]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*'''Delete''' non-notable journalist.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 05:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' non-notable journalist.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 05:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 06:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Natalia Ghilascu]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
|||
Revision as of 06:04, 23 September 2016
- Natalia Ghilascu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Aside from one interview that isn't really quotable, I'm really not seeing anything in the way of significant coverage in independent sources. There are some passing mentions, and then there are websites of organizations, or blurbs written by entities affiliated with the subject, and things of that nature. So as far as I can tell, the subject fails WP:BASIC. - Biruitorul Talk 19:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)