User talk:Ferr: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:21, 7 September 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Ferr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Chooserr

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.--Terraguy 23:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Silver Surfer. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 07:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:TimDuncanAllStarGame.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TimDuncanAllStarGame.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TimDuncanAllStarGame1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TimDuncanAllStarGame1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Scientology

Your recent edit to Scientology (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 08:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cross1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cross1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

NPOV, Re: Kimo von Oelhoffen

Just a notice, Wikipedia has a STRICT Neutral Point of View Policy, which is especially applicable to Biographical articles. The relevant policy articles can be found at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons. Intentionally adding unsubstantiated, biased statements to a biographical article is a serious breach of Wikipedia's policy. Not to mention that it reflects VERY badly on Laker fans everywhere. -Graptor 66.42.129.239 04:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:21, 7 September 2006 edit 66.42.129.239 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:21, 7 September 2006 edit undo Ferr (talk \| contribs) 49 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:

	==NPOV, Re: [[Kimo von Oelhoffen]]==		==NPOV, Re: [[Kimo von Oelhoffen]]==
	Just a notice, Wikipedia has a STRICT Neutral Point of View Policy, which is especially applicable to Biographical articles. The relevant policy articles can be found at [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view]] and [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons]]. Intentionally adding unsubstantiated, biased statements to a biographical article is a serious breach of Wikipedia's policy. Not to mention that it reflects VERY badly on ~~Bengals~~ fans everywhere. -Graptor [[User:66.42.129.239\|66.42.129.239]] 04:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)		Just a notice, Wikipedia has a STRICT Neutral Point of View Policy, which is especially applicable to Biographical articles. The relevant policy articles can be found at [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view]] and [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons]]. Intentionally adding unsubstantiated, biased statements to a biographical article is a serious breach of Wikipedia's policy. Not to mention that it reflects VERY badly on Laker fans everywhere. -Graptor [[User:66.42.129.239\|66.42.129.239]] 04:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)