Talk:History of the Indian Navy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:46, 10 October 2016

India: History Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Maritime / National / Asian / Indian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Neutrality?

Why is this article not considered neutral? Drutt (talk) 02:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TOPASS mutiny

I was wondering why the infamous Topass mutiny of 1970 is not mentioned in this article. ThanksWikiality 15:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Indian Maritime History.jpg

Image:Indian Maritime History.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1830 renamed as HER Majesty's. Victoria didn't become Queen until 1837

So if it was renamed in 1830 (or before 1837), then HM must have stood for HIS majesty's.

Could you check please.

George IV died in 1830 and was succeeded by William IV (1830-37). Victoria was 1837-1901.

Ganpati23 (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |National=yes
 }}
+{{Indian English}}
 ==Neutrality?==