Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeneCalling (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ce |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|GeneCalling}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|GeneCalling}}) |
||
1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA ([[Special:Contributions/Mbeach14]]) and has hardly changed since it was created, and technology is now far outdated. No reason for this promo cruft to exist. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 21:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC) |
1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA ([[Special:Contributions/Mbeach14]]) and has hardly changed since it was created, and technology is now far outdated. No reason for this promo cruft to exist. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 21:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
*I have no opinion at present about whether this should be kept or deleted, but must point out that the technology being far outdated is not a valid reason for, or contributory factor towards, deletion. We cover the history of science as well as current science. [[Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157]] ([[User talk:86.17.222.157|talk]]) 21:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:49, 10 October 2016
AfDs for this article:
- GeneCalling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA (Special:Contributions/Mbeach14) and has hardly changed since it was created, and technology is now far outdated. No reason for this promo cruft to exist. Jytdog (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have no opinion at present about whether this should be kept or deleted, but must point out that the technology being far outdated is not a valid reason for, or contributory factor towards, deletion. We cover the history of science as well as current science. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)