Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Townville Elementary School shooting: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:16, 20 October 2016

Townville Elementary School shooting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. John from Idegon (talk) 02:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator. Meatsgains (talk) 02:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nominator. A1b2C3d4 (talk) 02:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NOTNEWS. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable, received a lot of media attention, very tragic but memorable 73.162.238.253 (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per extensive coverage, plus the fact that the perp survived and there is 14 years old means that there is already geographically extensive coverage of the question of whether he will be tried as an adult (coverage of perp here:[1]) Certainly, if not kept it should be WP:REDIRECTed to List of school shootings in the United States, but my opinion is that the coverage of the event and the legal proceedings in its wake carry this past WP:GNG, and it is preferable to keep an event about a crime, than to create a separate article about the perp (whose age has already generated an unusual amount of coverage).E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Events|list of Events-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 12:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools|list of Schools-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 12:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)</small>
-'''Keep''' As per extensive coverage, plus the fact that the perp survived and there is 14 years old means that there is already geographically extensive coverage of the question of whether he will be tried as an adult (coverage of perp here:[https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jesse+Osborne%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%22Jesse+Osborne%22&tbm=nws])  Certainly, if not kept it should be [[WP:REDRECT]]ed to [[List of school shootings in the United States]], but my opinion is that the coverage of the event and the legal proceedings in its wake carry this past [[WP:GNG]], and it is preferable to keep an event about a crime, than to create a separate article about the perp (whose age has already generated an unusual amount of coverage).[[User:E.M.Gregory|E.M.Gregory]] ([[User talk:E.M.Gregory|talk]]) 10:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
+'''Keep''' As per extensive coverage, plus the fact that the perp survived and there is 14 years old means that there is already geographically extensive coverage of the question of whether he will be tried as an adult (coverage of perp here:[https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jesse+Osborne%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%22Jesse+Osborne%22&tbm=nws])  Certainly, if not kept it should be [[WP:REDIRECT]]ed to [[List of school shootings in the United States]], but my opinion is that the coverage of the event and the legal proceedings in its wake carry this past [[WP:GNG]], and it is preferable to keep an event about a crime, than to create a separate article about the perp (whose age has already generated an unusual amount of coverage).[[User:E.M.Gregory|E.M.Gregory]] ([[User talk:E.M.Gregory|talk]]) 10:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)