Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serene Air: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added to some afd lists. |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Delete''' I don't see any reason this is notable yet. After the airline starts operating, then I think there might be (some) reason for an article, but not yet. Furthermore, the official website says "Coming Soon." <b>[[User:Thegreatgrabber|Thegreatgrabber]]</b> [[User talk:Thegreatgrabber|(talk)]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Thegreatgrabber|contribs]]</sup> 22:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' I don't see any reason this is notable yet. After the airline starts operating, then I think there might be (some) reason for an article, but not yet. Furthermore, the official website says "Coming Soon." <b>[[User:Thegreatgrabber|Thegreatgrabber]]</b> [[User talk:Thegreatgrabber|(talk)]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Thegreatgrabber|contribs]]</sup> 22:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' I have created this page so it may be a bit biased but my argument is that the airline will start flying by 1st November 2016 which is less than a month away. It is better to keep the page than to delete it and remake it after 15 days. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shiraz.s10|Shiraz.s10]] ([[User talk:Shiraz.s10#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shiraz.s10|contribs]]) 17:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
* '''Keep''' I have created this page so it may be a bit biased but my argument is that the airline will start flying by 1st November 2016 which is less than a month away. It is better to keep the page than to delete it and remake it after 15 days. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shiraz.s10|Shiraz.s10]] ([[User talk:Shiraz.s10#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shiraz.s10|contribs]]) 17:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
* '''Keep''' Why not keep the page.. The Air line fleet is already seen and in a few days will start its operations. I dont also see any reason that this page should be deleted, rather the page should have all the required things on it. like the logo of the company, first 737-800 plane which is parked at Ranton atm and may be pictures of the officials and staff <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Junaid Faisal]] ([[User talk:Junaid Fasial#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Junaid Faisal|contribs]]) 17:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-- |
|||
*'''Keep''' -- [[Civil Aviation Authority]] has already granted Serene Air a licence so this a carrier soon commencing its operation. I've added references to the page so I hope now the airline merits an entry. --[[User:Saqib|Saqib]] ([[User talk:Saqib|talk]]) 17:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' -- [[Civil Aviation Authority]] has already granted Serene Air a licence so this a carrier soon commencing its operation. I've added references to the page so I hope now the airline merits an entry. --[[User:Saqib|Saqib]] ([[User talk:Saqib|talk]]) 17:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
::Merely being in business does not automatically make a company, even an airline, notable. This was a page created by the airline (note how while just one editor had worked on it, the article was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Serene_Air&oldid=744695263 referring to the airline as "us"] to promote a business that they are not actually in yet, much less notable for. --[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 17:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
::Merely being in business does not automatically make a company, even an airline, notable. This was a page created by the airline (note how while just one editor had worked on it, the article was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Serene_Air&oldid=744695263 referring to the airline as "us"] to promote a business that they are not actually in yet, much less notable for. --[[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 17:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:41, 23 October 2016
- Serene Air (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. This is an airline that is not yet certified to fly, much less has any scheduled flights. It may well be notable in the future, but for now what it has is announced intents and a plane order. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see any reason this is notable yet. After the airline starts operating, then I think there might be (some) reason for an article, but not yet. Furthermore, the official website says "Coming Soon." Thegreatgrabber (talk) contribs 22:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I have created this page so it may be a bit biased but my argument is that the airline will start flying by 1st November 2016 which is less than a month away. It is better to keep the page than to delete it and remake it after 15 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiraz.s10 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Why not keep the page.. The Air line fleet is already seen and in a few days will start its operations. I dont also see any reason that this page should be deleted, rather the page should have all the required things on it. like the logo of the company, first 737-800 plane which is parked at Ranton atm and may be pictures of the officials and staff — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Junaid Faisal (talk • contribs) 17:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)