Jump to content

Talk:Evolved antenna: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up / banner standardisation using AWB (11727)
Line 11: Line 11:


: Tried to find a correct link to the paper. Closest thing I found is [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub-archive/812h/0812%20(Lohn).pdf An Evolved Antenna for Deployment on NASA's Space Technology 5 Mission] (indexed at [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/pub-archive/2004/]) which has a slightly different title than the GPTP site has but is the only plausible match for 2004. Can anyone confirm whether this is the right paper? — [[User:Unbitwise|Unbitwise]] ([[User talk:Unbitwise|talk]]) 20:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
: Tried to find a correct link to the paper. Closest thing I found is [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub-archive/812h/0812%20(Lohn).pdf An Evolved Antenna for Deployment on NASA's Space Technology 5 Mission] (indexed at [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/pub-archive/2004/]) which has a slightly different title than the GPTP site has but is the only plausible match for 2004. Can anyone confirm whether this is the right paper? — [[User:Unbitwise|Unbitwise]] ([[User talk:Unbitwise|talk]]) 20:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

== Evolved antenna in a cartoon in the 70s or 80s ==

An office type silently takes a clip and bends it. It produces a very similar form for a gadget, and antenna. Laugh is expected to burst at that moment in criticism of technology. Several antenna gags were also common in those years, around the same paradigm: weird and comical form of antennas producing better/weird/super results. This points to two possibilities: 1) optimum form antennas were analyzed mathematically and were already known; 2) when trying the problem the Human brain will very naturally reach this form. So there is some doubt this example is the best one for this article.

Revision as of 15:10, 24 October 2016

Untitled

NASA reference link at the bottom has moved http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/asr/aces/

Tried to find a correct link to the paper. Closest thing I found is An Evolved Antenna for Deployment on NASA's Space Technology 5 Mission (indexed at [1]) which has a slightly different title than the GPTP site has but is the only plausible match for 2004. Can anyone confirm whether this is the right paper? — Unbitwise (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evolved antenna in a cartoon in the 70s or 80s

An office type silently takes a clip and bends it. It produces a very similar form for a gadget, and antenna. Laugh is expected to burst at that moment in criticism of technology. Several antenna gags were also common in those years, around the same paradigm: weird and comical form of antennas producing better/weird/super results. This points to two possibilities: 1) optimum form antennas were analyzed mathematically and were already known; 2) when trying the problem the Human brain will very naturally reach this form. So there is some doubt this example is the best one for this article.