Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/9/99: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:37, 9 September 2006

Delete: Unreferenced and sounds like WP:NOR violation. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sounds like a hoax. — Dark Shikari ^talk/_contribs 02:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax. I remember plenty of mainstream media predictions that this would be a real problem, and a foreshadow of y2k chaos. Read this and the links therein, I think it sums it up pretty well. My Alt Account 02:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That link is just a forum posting and none of the links from it are still functional. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's not a forum, it's an old website by Dave Farber that tracks mailing list posts by "interesting people". With a little effort, I got this one to actually work... My Alt Account 02:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per wknight's first comment --Supermath 02:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, It's not a hoax, but it doesn't warrant an article -- perhaps a few sentences in the Y2K article. Opelio 03:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *** It's not a forum, it's an old website by [[Dave Farber]] that tracks mailing list posts by "interesting people". With a little effort, I got [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/09/08/BU25634.DTL&type=tech_article this one] to actually work... [[User:My Alt Account|My Alt Account]] 02:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''', per wknight's first comment --[[User:Supermath|Supermath]] 02:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', It's not a hoax, but it doesn't warrant an article -- perhaps a few sentences in the Y2K article. [[User:Opelio|Opelio]] 03:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)