Talk:January 2016 Istanbul bombing: Difference between revisions
Jim Michael (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Boneyard90 (talk | contribs) Removed WP:Death banner. Subject covered by WP:Terrorism. |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{WP Crime|class=start}} |
{{WP Crime|class=start}} |
||
{{WikiProject Terrorism|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
{{WikiProject Terrorism|class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Death|class=start|suicide=y}} |
|||
{{WP Islam|Islam-and-Controversy=y|class=start}} |
{{WP Islam|Islam-and-Controversy=y|class=start}} |
||
{{Disaster management|class=start}} |
{{Disaster management|class=start}} |
||
{{serial killer|class=start}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 14:31, 6 November 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the January 2016 Istanbul bombing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Reflist columns
User:Kristijh: could you please explain here whats the point of increasing column in reflist? --Saqib (talk) 10:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Should stay at 30em. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Removal of table
I originally removed the table of victims on 13 January for the following reasons "Tables are rarely to be used in articles and only done so when prose cannot adequately cover the topic. This is a poor example of where to use a table.". It has since been added back by @Ernio48: without rationale. I will use the talk page to further explain Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables. First of all listing such a tiny amount of information is prefered in list format rather than a table "If a list is simple, it is generally better to use one of the standard Wikipedia list formats instead of a table." Second of all prose is better than both "Prose is preferred in articles as prose allows the presentation of detail and clarification of context, in a way that a table may not." As it stands, the table is replicating the information already explained in the prose, so it is quite obvious that prose is suitable. If anyone thinks the table is important enough to sacrifice the flow of the article, then please post reasons in this section. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 20:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- No, its removal was a sound edit. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- Start-Class Turkey articles
- Mid-importance Turkey articles
- All WikiProject Turkey pages
- Start-Class Crime-related articles
- Unknown-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Unassessed Crime-related articles
- Unassessed Terrorism articles
- Mid-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- Start-Class Islam-related articles
- Unknown-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Start-Class Disaster management articles
- Unknown-importance Disaster management articles