Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of California, Berkeley/Civic Tech and the Social Media President (Fall 2016)

This Course Dashboard Discussion Activity Feed Edit this page

Wikipedia Resources Interactive training Editing guidelines (PDF) Help pages (PDF) More resources

Connect Other courses Questions? Ask us: contactwikiedu.org

Course name

Civic Tech and the Social Media President

Institution

University of California, Berkeley

Instructor

David Harris

Wikipedia Expert

Ian (Wiki Ed)

Subject

Business Administration

Course dates

2016-08-30 00:00:00 UTC – 2016-12-09 23:59:59 UTC

Approximate number of student editors

15

As you prepare to cast a vote in what may be your first presidential election, you will be invited to explore the ways in which social media and related technologies are reshaping political landscapes around the world. In the course, we will look at the ways in which politicians have already adopted social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, paying close attention to weekly developments in the presidential election as it unfolds in real time during the semester.

We will also closely examine an array of emerging “civic technologies,” including those developed by new political parties (Pirate Party, Partido de la Red), nonprofit organizations (Sunlight Labs, Democracy.Earth, Participatory Democracy Foundation), for-profit startups (Brigade, PopVox, Democracy.com) and government agencies (We The People, Tunisian and Icelandic crowdsourced constitutions, eStonia, Participatory Budgeting). Students will be encouraged to develop critical perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of new approaches to democracy from technical, political-economic and critical-theoretical perspectives.

Students will follow the unfolding US Presidential Election in real time, using the New York Times (subscriptions provided to students), as well as a multitude of other outlets.

Student	Assigned	Reviewing
Demberkeley	Popvox
Jross35	Open government, PopVox, Civic technology
Joykim328	Electronic Voting
Somara S
Jinnayang	Civic technology, National Democratic Institute, Open government, Code For All
Lubnasebastian	Innovative Politicians
Mff2020	Alliance '90/The Greens, Single-member district, Bennett Freeze
Murat39e	Voter turnout, Voter apathy, Get out the vote
Ishapunja	Marci Harris	Civic technology, Internet activism, Liberland
Hfpolitics
Kojinglick
JoseLara	Political apathy	Political apathy
Jurgen.Prambs	Hacktivism
Ali.ahmed	Code for America, City Innovate
Jxyao	Dan Ariely, The Upside of Irrationality
Cheng960816
Hejang

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings

Tuesday, 11 October 2016

In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

• Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
• Evaluating Wikipedia

Assignment - Practicing the basics

• Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
•  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
•  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 

Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

Assignment - Critique an article

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 

• Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
• Choose an article, and consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
  • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
  • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
  • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
  • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
•  Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Lubnasebastian (talk) 04:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC). 

In class - Discussion

What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

• Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
• What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
• Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
• What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

• Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
• The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 4

Course meetings

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

In class - Discussion

Thinking about sources and plagiarism

• Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
• What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
• What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
• What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Assignment - Choose possible topics

• Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
• Choose 3–5 potential articles that you can tackle, and post links to them on your Wikipedia user page. For articles that already exist, check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians might be doing. Finally, present your choices to your instructor for feedback.

Week 5

Course meetings

Tuesday, 8 November 2016

Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources

• On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
• In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
  • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
  • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

• Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
  • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

• Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.

---

Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings

Tuesday, 15 November 2016

In class - Discussion

Thinking about Wikipedia

• What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
• What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
• On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
• If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Assignment - Expand your draft

• Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
• If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Assignment - Peer review and copy edit

• First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
• Select a classmates’ article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review, and then assign it to yourself in the Review column.
• Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
• As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?

Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 7

Course meetings

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

• Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
• Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.

Week 8

Course meetings

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

• NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
• Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?

• Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
• You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

Week 9

Course meetings

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

• Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.

Week 10

Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 11

Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

• Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
• Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!

Assignment - Reflective essay

• Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Week 12

Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.