Talk:Chewiness: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:25, 21 November 2016

I must question the metrics that you put forth in this article. Chew count seems incorrect by dimensional analysis. According to this definition, a king size Baby Ruth is chewier than a fun size, which is clearly not true. As for chew rate, it depends too much on the person. If we take chew rate to be chews divided by time, then chew rate could vary widely depending on how fast the person decides to chew. I think the obvious measure of chewiness is chews per swallow, which eliminates the flaws of the other two methods. TheKarmaCrip 01:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TKC, I acknowledge that the metrics offer an incomplete contour of the tricky concept of Chewiness, but chews per swallow is disproved by gum. However, recent empirical research may bail you out here, as more and more people are swallowing their gum. Bristow 23:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chewiness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515094343/http://www.stablemicrosystems.com:80/tpa.htm to http://www.stablemicrosystems.com/tpa.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 TKC, I acknowledge that the metrics offer an incomplete contour of the tricky concept of Chewiness, but chews per swallow is disproved by gum.  However, recent empirical research may bail you out here, as more and more people are swallowing their gum.
 [[User:Bristow|Bristow]] 23:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
+== External links modified ==
+Hello fellow Wikipedians,
+I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Chewiness]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=750748111 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515094343/http://www.stablemicrosystems.com:80/tpa.htm to http://www.stablemicrosystems.com/tpa.htm
+When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
+{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
+Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)