Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America Destroyed By Design: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:10, 11 September 2006

America Destroyed By Design

Another non notable conspiracy video. Almost no content, except for links to other articles. Peephole 13:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yet another recapitulation of Jones' theories. Non-notable. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nom and Tom. Morton devonshire 17:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete stop the madness. BYU did. --Tbeatty 17:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and unsourced conspiracy thoery.-- danntm ^T _C 17:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even listed on IMDB. --Aude (talk contribs as tagcloud) 18:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Aaron 20:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Gazpacho 21:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Close earliy Not notable and per WP:SNOW Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 22:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete self-published conspiracycruft. Danny Lilithborne 01:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Content-free; adds nothing to what is already in the article on Jones. Ergative rlt 22:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Err, has anyone actually tried improving the article?--Pussy Galore 02:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To improve the article, one would actually have to watch the video. (My rate for watching conspiracy videos is $100/hour.) If you think you can improve it, go ahead and try. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I feel bad because Striver has spent so much time and effort on this conspiracy stuff, but at this point I think it's just POV pushing and effectively free advertizing for non-notable works and people.--Cúchullain ^t/c 04:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn--MONGO 09:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nearly speedy, as there's no assertion of notability backed by a source other than the author. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' Content-free; adds nothing to what is already in the article on Jones. [[User:Ergative rlt|Ergative rlt]] 22:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Err, has anyone actually tried improving the article?--[[User:Pussy Galore|Pussy Galore]] 02:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
+:To improve the article, one would actually have to watch the video.  (My rate for watching conspiracy videos is $100/hour.)  If you think you can improve it, go ahead and try. &mdash; [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] |  [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 21:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. I feel bad because Striver has spent so much time and effort on this conspiracy stuff, but at this point I think it's just POV pushing and effectively free advertizing for non-notable works and people.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 04:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' nn--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 09:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', nearly speedy, as there's no assertion of notability backed by a source other than the author.  &mdash; [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] |  [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 21:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)