Talk:Comet Ping Pong: Difference between revisions
Just a Rube (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→rolol: new section |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I agree FallingGravity. I reverted it to an older version that mentioned it briefly, and made clear that it's a conspiracy theory. The fact that people have been harassed because of this ridiculous nonsense is the most pertinent thing about the theory to this restaurant; we don't need to talk any more about it in this article, which should focus on the pizza place.[[User:Just a Rube|Just a Rube]] ([[User talk:Just a Rube|talk]]) 02:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC) |
I agree FallingGravity. I reverted it to an older version that mentioned it briefly, and made clear that it's a conspiracy theory. The fact that people have been harassed because of this ridiculous nonsense is the most pertinent thing about the theory to this restaurant; we don't need to talk any more about it in this article, which should focus on the pizza place.[[User:Just a Rube|Just a Rube]] ([[User talk:Just a Rube|talk]]) 02:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
== rolol == |
|||
[[Category:Suicide]] |
|||
[[Category:Homosexuality]] |
|||
[[Category:Suicide]] |
Revision as of 09:57, 27 November 2016
United States: District of Columbia C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Headers Added
I have inserted the review and current event headers to the article. My opinion is that it comes across like an advertisement, but that is debatable. What is not a matter of debate is that this venue is currently the subject of intense discussion on social media at this time; therefore, the header ought remain in place so as to inform readers that it is involved in an ongoing matter. I'll refrain from openly discussing the situation here, but I for one would not discourage others from doing so. Should anybody require information about this matter then let me Google that for you. Mere Mortal (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Pizzagate
The size of the pizzagate section is becoming undue. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- I reverted the article to an earlier version of the article which mentions the conspiracy in passing. For one thing, most of the details on the conspiracy have nothing to do with the restaurant itself. The readers just need a brief intro to the conspiracy to understand how this affected the restaurant in real life. Further details can go in Draft:Pizzagate until it's expanded enough to earn its own article. FallingGravity 06:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree FallingGravity. I reverted it to an older version that mentioned it briefly, and made clear that it's a conspiracy theory. The fact that people have been harassed because of this ridiculous nonsense is the most pertinent thing about the theory to this restaurant; we don't need to talk any more about it in this article, which should focus on the pizza place.Just a Rube (talk) 02:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)