Jump to content

Talk:Comet Ping Pong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
rolol: new section
Line 10: Line 10:


I agree FallingGravity. I reverted it to an older version that mentioned it briefly, and made clear that it's a conspiracy theory. The fact that people have been harassed because of this ridiculous nonsense is the most pertinent thing about the theory to this restaurant; we don't need to talk any more about it in this article, which should focus on the pizza place.[[User:Just a Rube|Just a Rube]] ([[User talk:Just a Rube|talk]]) 02:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree FallingGravity. I reverted it to an older version that mentioned it briefly, and made clear that it's a conspiracy theory. The fact that people have been harassed because of this ridiculous nonsense is the most pertinent thing about the theory to this restaurant; we don't need to talk any more about it in this article, which should focus on the pizza place.[[User:Just a Rube|Just a Rube]] ([[User talk:Just a Rube|talk]]) 02:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

== rolol ==

[[Category:Suicide]]
[[Category:Homosexuality]]
[[Category:Suicide]]

Revision as of 09:57, 27 November 2016

WikiProject iconUnited States: District of Columbia C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Headers Added

I have inserted the review and current event headers to the article. My opinion is that it comes across like an advertisement, but that is debatable. What is not a matter of debate is that this venue is currently the subject of intense discussion on social media at this time; therefore, the header ought remain in place so as to inform readers that it is involved in an ongoing matter. I'll refrain from openly discussing the situation here, but I for one would not discourage others from doing so. Should anybody require information about this matter then let me Google that for you. Mere Mortal (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pizzagate

The size of the pizzagate section is becoming undue. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the article to an earlier version of the article which mentions the conspiracy in passing. For one thing, most of the details on the conspiracy have nothing to do with the restaurant itself. The readers just need a brief intro to the conspiracy to understand how this affected the restaurant in real life. Further details can go in Draft:Pizzagate until it's expanded enough to earn its own article. FallingGravity 06:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree FallingGravity. I reverted it to an older version that mentioned it briefly, and made clear that it's a conspiracy theory. The fact that people have been harassed because of this ridiculous nonsense is the most pertinent thing about the theory to this restaurant; we don't need to talk any more about it in this article, which should focus on the pizza place.Just a Rube (talk) 02:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rolol