Jump to content

Talk:Roanoke Colony: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 752705032 by 207.157.204.115 (talk)
Line 29: Line 29:
Roanoke is a native American word for white beads make from shell (origin- From Powhatan rawrenock "things rubbed smooth by hand")so using that word would be after the colony was already in place I would think. Did Elizabeth/Raleigh have a English name for the new colony or was it just formed and sent without one? It wouldn't be under the Virginia Company would it as that wasn't formed until James I was in power in 1603 (Jamestown 1607)? I do know the Virginia charter was vast ("sea to sea") and covered most of Carolina and overlapped the Plymouth charter founded later. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.126.193.15|96.126.193.15]] ([[User talk:96.126.193.15|talk]]) 16:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Roanoke is a native American word for white beads make from shell (origin- From Powhatan rawrenock "things rubbed smooth by hand")so using that word would be after the colony was already in place I would think. Did Elizabeth/Raleigh have a English name for the new colony or was it just formed and sent without one? It wouldn't be under the Virginia Company would it as that wasn't formed until James I was in power in 1603 (Jamestown 1607)? I do know the Virginia charter was vast ("sea to sea") and covered most of Carolina and overlapped the Plymouth charter founded later. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.126.193.15|96.126.193.15]] ([[User talk:96.126.193.15|talk]]) 16:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Dead reference ==
== Dead
==
Reference #27 seems to no longer link to a paper or an article - It seems rather important, too. Does anyone know of other sources?--[[Special:Contributions/92.243.251.196|92.243.251.196]] ([[User talk:92.243.251.196|talk]]) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Reference #27 seems to no longer link to a paper or an article - It seems rather important, too. Does anyone know of other sources?--[[Special:Contributions/92.243.251.196|92.243.251.196]] ([[User talk:92.243.251.196|talk]]) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
:updated with http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9244947/Ancient-map-gives-clue-to-fate-of-Lost-Colony.html [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 01:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
:updated with http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9244947/Ancient-map-gives-clue-to-fate-of-Lost-Colony.html [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 01:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:24, 2 December 2016

First sentence

Shouldn't the first sentence end with something like "... to establish a permanent English settlement in North America"? Otherwise an "English settlement" could be just about anywhere... --Aeonblue158 (talk) 22:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing reference to geographical location

This phrase: " at the site of the ancient Croatoan capital, 50 miles (80 km) from the old Roanoke colony", should have an indication of the actual location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.221.18.82 (talk) 14:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2016

Mommy bubbles (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify what you're requesting? —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 17:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Colony Name?

Roanoke is a native American word for white beads make from shell (origin- From Powhatan rawrenock "things rubbed smooth by hand")so using that word would be after the colony was already in place I would think. Did Elizabeth/Raleigh have a English name for the new colony or was it just formed and sent without one? It wouldn't be under the Virginia Company would it as that wasn't formed until James I was in power in 1603 (Jamestown 1607)? I do know the Virginia charter was vast ("sea to sea") and covered most of Carolina and overlapped the Plymouth charter founded later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.126.193.15 (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

== Dead

==

Reference #27 seems to no longer link to a paper or an article - It seems rather important, too. Does anyone know of other sources?--92.243.251.196 (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

updated with http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9244947/Ancient-map-gives-clue-to-fate-of-Lost-Colony.html Meters (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]