Jump to content

Talk:Meridian campaign: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Tuckerresearch moved page Talk:Battle of Meridian to Talk:Meridian Campaign: actual title
Merger proposal: new section
Line 41: Line 41:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 18:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 18:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

== Merger proposal ==

I propose that [[Meridian Expedition]] be merged into [[Meridian Campaign]]. They seem to be covering the same material. [[User:Tuckerresearch|TuckerResearch]] ([[User talk:Tuckerresearch|talk]]) 20:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:44, 5 December 2016

WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
American Civil War task force
WikiProject iconUnited States: Civil War / Mississippi / Military history C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Copyvio? -- no

This article is a copy of the National Park Service website listed in the References. As a work of US government employees, the text in that website is in the public domain and many of the American Civil War battle articles in Wikipedia were started by verbatim copying from that site. Hal Jespersen 23:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, better safe than sorry. Cheers SGGH speak! 23:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only one source

Meridian, Mississippi#Civil War Era contains a reworded description of this battle that contains information from more than one source. Using one source for all the information in an article is not a good idea (Template:onesource); I suggest trying to merge the multi-sourced section with this page. The section also includes an image of Sherman and Polk, the two major commanders in this battle, which would be a good addition to this article. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 20:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just merged this article with the aforementioned section. I reworded a lot of it and added new sources, so some copy-editing may be necessary. I also added the two pictures, but there's not really a good place for them. Feel free to move them to wherever they fit more. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turning East after Vicksburg?

Sherman had already moved East to help Grant in Chattanooga. He then had to move West for the Meridian campaign. 86.154.93.83 (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good source that may be added to the article

This page contains the memoirs of General Sherman himself as he was on his Meridian Campaign. I haven't read them in detail, but there is probably a lot of good information in them. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 02:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For Goodness' Sake

There was no Battle of Meridian. This was the Meridian Campaign but who knows how to correct the title or heading? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjr1960 (talkcontribs) 06:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Meridian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Meridian Expedition be merged into Meridian Campaign. They seem to be covering the same material. TuckerResearch (talk) 20:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]