Talk:Project portfolio management: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 205.153.89.193 - "→Written as an Advertisement?: " |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: Deleting next [[User:Markbassett|Markbassett]] ([[User talk:Markbassett|talk]]) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
: Deleting next [[User:Markbassett|Markbassett]] ([[User talk:Markbassett|talk]]) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
It seems the wording was nicked verbatim from "The Wiley Guide to Project, Program, and Portfolio Management" (see [https://books.google.com/books?id=-5G4DAAAQBAJ&pg=PT10&lpg=PT10&dq=%22honouring+constraints+imposed+by%22&source=bl&ots=n-pIcvUf_S&sig=Jg2cakSZZtHSsHJBBAD9s4FnQTA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj27Onezt_QAhUF5yYKHd8kDNQQ6AEIIDAB#v=onepage&q=%22honouring%20constraints%20imposed%20by%22&f=false here] ). |
It seems the wording was nicked verbatim from "The Wiley Guide to Project, Program, and Portfolio Management" (see [https://books.google.com/books?id=-5G4DAAAQBAJ&pg=PT10&lpg=PT10&dq=%22honouring+constraints+imposed+by%22&source=bl&ots=n-pIcvUf_S&sig=Jg2cakSZZtHSsHJBBAD9s4FnQTA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj27Onezt_QAhUF5yYKHd8kDNQQ6AEIIDAB#v=onepage&q=%22honouring%20constraints%20imposed%20by%22&f=false here] ). <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/205.153.89.193|205.153.89.193]] ([[User talk:205.153.89.193#top|talk]]) 13:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Lacking in references to reliable sources == |
== Lacking in references to reliable sources == |
Revision as of 13:03, 6 December 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Written as an Advertisement?
In May of 2013 a notice was put up that this article appears to be written like an advertisement. I actually disagree with that. I read through a lot and gained some good insight for a project I'm working on. Should that notice be removed or do others disagree with me? Jasenlee (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'll agree and take it down. The notice was posted 20:13, 13 May 2013 by user 66.6.146.58
- There is no talk or detail to work with, the description at history only says "(holy crap)"
- No such concern apparent to Jasenlee and I and nobody else voiced one
- Significant time and deletions have occurred - e.g. sections The PPM market and Capability Definition, and references to PMI PMBOK and Gartner. (I think it was better before but ... point here is that eliminated area where such a concern might have been.)
- Deleting next Markbassett (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
It seems the wording was nicked verbatim from "The Wiley Guide to Project, Program, and Portfolio Management" (see here ). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.89.193 (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Lacking in references to reliable sources
OK, so it's not advertising... but it isn't a good page yet. The page is lacking in references to actual sources. Many pages on Wikipedia that look like this have been deleted for being non notable. Let's not let a valid page die because we are too lazy to cite sources. Nickmalik (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)