Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hootan Dolati: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Shawn in Montreal (talk) to last version by جسورانه |
→Hootan Dolati: consensus there seems to be to keep |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Keep''' The Persian-language Wikipedia article is very well developed. Using Google translate, from what I can make out, there do seem to be very good number of reliable sources about the article subject. Reliable sources do not have to be in English, here. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 15:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' The Persian-language Wikipedia article is very well developed. Using Google translate, from what I can make out, there do seem to be very good number of reliable sources about the article subject. Reliable sources do not have to be in English, here. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 15:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
:hi see [[w:fa:ویکیپدیا:نظرخواهی_برای_حذف/هوتن_دولتی]]--[[User:جسورانه|جسورانه]] ([[User talk:جسورانه|talk]]) 15:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
:hi see [[w:fa:ویکیپدیا:نظرخواهی_برای_حذف/هوتن_دولتی]]--[[User:جسورانه|جسورانه]] ([[User talk:جسورانه|talk]]) 15:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
*Thank you. If I understand correctly, that is the the Persian language article deletion discussion, where so far the consensus is unanimously to keep, is that not so? [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 15:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:50, 18 December 2016
- Hootan Dolati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject does not pass WP:GNG, nor it passes Politicians notability criteria. At most we can say that it's too soon for him to be an encyclopedic entry. Saff V. (talk) 07:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The Persian-language Wikipedia article is very well developed. Using Google translate, from what I can make out, there do seem to be very good number of reliable sources about the article subject. Reliable sources do not have to be in English, here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. If I understand correctly, that is the the Persian language article deletion discussion, where so far the consensus is unanimously to keep, is that not so? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)