User talk:Bjoechan: Difference between revisions
This appeal is now closed (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
m Bot: removing CAT:UWCOI from indefinitely blocked user talk page. |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|WP:PAID]]). |
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|WP:PAID]]). |
||
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|sourcing]] and [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|autobiographies]]. Thank you.{{#if:| [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 18:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)}}<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. --> |
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|sourcing]] and [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|autobiographies]]. Thank you.{{#if:| [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 18:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)}}<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. --><!-- Template:uw-coi --> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 18:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
::As said above. As you have a COI do not edit the article directly. Best [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 14:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC) |
::As said above. As you have a COI do not edit the article directly. Best [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 14:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:21, 21 December 2016
Welcome!
|
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]Hello, Bjoechan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Thomas Rosica, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- As said above. As you have a COI do not edit the article directly. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Copy and pasting
[edit]We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
https://grabien.com/profile.php?id=24628
May 2016
[edit]Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Bjoechan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just got on Wikipedia for 1 day!!!!! I have no idea what you are talking about!!!!
Decline reason:
You have made a UTRS request, so I'll leave it to them to deal with your request. Yamla (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bjoechan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #15890 was submitted on May 31, 2016 15:28:29. This review is now closed.