Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America Destroyed By Design: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:07, 14 September 2006

America Destroyed By Design

Another non notable conspiracy video. Almost no content, except for links to other articles. Peephole 13:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yet another recapitulation of Jones' theories. Non-notable. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nom and Tom. Morton devonshire 17:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete stop the madness. BYU did. --Tbeatty 17:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and unsourced conspiracy thoery.-- danntm ^T _C 17:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even listed on IMDB. --Aude (talk contribs as tagcloud) 18:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Aaron 20:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Gazpacho 21:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Close earliy Not notable and per WP:SNOW Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 22:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete self-published conspiracycruft. Danny Lilithborne 01:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Content-free; adds nothing to what is already in the article on Jones. Ergative rlt 22:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Err, has anyone actually tried improving the article?--Pussy Galore 02:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC) indefintely banned for trolling[reply]

To improve the article, one would actually have to watch the video. (My rate for watching conspiracy videos is $100/hour.) If you think you can improve it, go ahead and try. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And how would I do if that if the article were to be deleted?--Pussy Galore 22:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the odds aren't good, but that's primarily because (IMHO) there's nothing that belongs there that isn't in the Jones article. But you won't know unless you try.

Delete. I feel bad because Striver has spent so much time and effort on this conspiracy stuff, but at this point I think it's just POV pushing and effectively free advertizing for non-notable works and people.--Cúchullain ^t/c 04:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn--MONGO 09:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nearly speedy, as there's no assertion of notability backed by a source other than the author. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn--Mmx1 01:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Crockspot 05:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. RFerreira 07:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The only reason Alex Jones is notable enough to have a page at Wiki because he is a crackpot. I cannot believe people fall for this "stuff" (feel free to substitute a more choice word). Wikipedia is not a platform for this "stuff". Burn it. (and protect from re-creation) JungleCat talk/contrib 12:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn --Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 14:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable GabrielF 16:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The non-notable 9/11 conspiracy-cruft is getting tiresome. JoshuaZ 23:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge... at least until someone can summarize the video. Alex Jones is a notable conspiracy theorist with famous supporters, and as such a series on Jones's works is entirely appropriate for Wikipedia. Calwatch 04:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 *'''Delete''' non-notable [[User:GabrielF|GabrielF]] 16:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' The non-notable 9/11 conspiracy-cruft is getting tiresome. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Merge'''... at least until someone can summarize the video. Alex Jones is a notable conspiracy theorist with famous supporters, and as such a series on Jones's works is entirely appropriate for Wikipedia. [[User:Calwatch|Calwatch]] 04:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)