Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Language/Written: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Emk~enwiki (talk | contribs)
Emk~enwiki (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:


: If there were a runic userbox, I'd probably display it on my user page. But how should I choose between -1, -2, etc.? :-) -[[User:Emk|emk]] 00:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
: If there were a runic userbox, I'd probably display it on my user page. But how should I choose between -1, -2, etc.? :-) -[[User:Emk|emk]] 00:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, I took the liberty of adding "Runr" support to [[Template:User iso15924]]. (That is a ''seriously'' esoteric template.) To use it, type something like <nowiki>{{User iso15924|Runr|1}}</nowiki> on your user page. There's no codes for the individual Futharks, but I suppose we could put some sort of specialized userboxes together in the User namespace.

I still have no idea what the -1, -2, ..., or -N modifiers ought to mean for writing systems, either. :-) -[[User:Emk|emk]] 17:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


== User iso15924 ==
== User iso15924 ==

Revision as of 17:16, 14 September 2006

Request for new writing-system category: runes (ISO code runr)

Although I've previously discussed adding a userbox for runic literacy (in the Babelbox section), it seems more logical to list that skill under writing systems instead of languages. I see only a few problems with adding "runr-n" userboxes:

  1. No native level would apply, because almost nobody consistently uses runes (an ancient script) to write their native language.
  2. Some distinction between variants of the runic alphabet (Primitive Germanic vs. Saxon vs. Norse) might be useful. The ISO system, however, treats all runic scripts as a single block of Unicode: what kind of modifier should be added to "runr-n" to specify a variant alphabet?

--Ingeborg S. Nordén 00:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 15924 is Runr not runr. About variants you may ask User:Evertype who makes the codes. (nice to have him in WP). That currently nobody has Runr-N does not matter. I support the creation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 01:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming the four historical runic systems are the Elder Fuþark, the Anglo-Saxon Fuþorc, the Younger Fuþąrk (long and short twig), and the medieval Scandanavian runes. Is this correct, or would you suggest a different breakdown?
If there were a runic userbox, I'd probably display it on my user page. But how should I choose between -1, -2, etc.? :-) -emk 00:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I took the liberty of adding "Runr" support to Template:User iso15924. (That is a seriously esoteric template.) To use it, type something like {{User iso15924|Runr|1}} on your user page. There's no codes for the individual Futharks, but I suppose we could put some sort of specialized userboxes together in the User namespace.

I still have no idea what the -1, -2, ..., or -N modifiers ought to mean for writing systems, either. :-) -emk 17:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User iso15924

instead of creating 100 userboxes we could make Template:User iso15924 and then let people simply pass parameters. "{User iso15924|-ISO 15924-|-level-}" e.g. "{User iso15924|Cyrl|4}". Maybe an advanced template coder could do this. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMO the old boxes should than be only aliases. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD and CfD

Level N and 5 are up for deletion Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_26#Category:Writing_systems_categories Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ipa-0

Can an admin state whether this was properly deleted, i.e. according to WP policies? was it marked for deletion? http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Template:User_ipa-0

I think ipa-0 can in fact be usefull since it is used in en:WP, as en-0 is usefull for languages in en:WP. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was a TfD discussion about this and other 'level 0' templates, but the template itself was never tagged for deletion and thus the ~50 people using it were likely unaware of the discussion. That is out of process so I have restored this template for now. --CBD 14:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 15:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]