Jump to content

User talk:Wyllium: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wyllium (talk | contribs)
vendetta? what?
Line 35: Line 35:


*I have no idea what you mean with ''vendetta against ANSI artists''. I listed Textfiles.com for one reason only, and that is that I have doubts about it's notability. If it is important enough there will be enough ''keep'' votes and you'll have nothing to worry about. [[User:Wyllium|Wyllium]] 07:56, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)
*I have no idea what you mean with ''vendetta against ANSI artists''. I listed Textfiles.com for one reason only, and that is that I have doubts about it's notability. If it is important enough there will be enough ''keep'' votes and you'll have nothing to worry about. [[User:Wyllium|Wyllium]] 07:56, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)
**Sorry, I confused you with someone else, I think. — [[User:Chmod007|David Remahl]] 08:00, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:00, 17 November 2004

Archive

Welcome to my discussion page

  • Please create a header for your comment/question.
  • I reply here, not on your discussion page.


Re: Welcome

Posted on User:ClockworkTroll

Quick question, what is the tag you use to welcome users? Wyllium 20:05, 2004 Nov 13 (UTC)

  • I use one that I made myself. I'll copy it here for you, and I also keep it posted on the bottom of my user page for reference:
{{subst:User:ClockworkTroll/welcome}}

~~~~

Hello. Please note that there is no need to write [[taboo|taboos]], since [[taboo]]s has the same effect (the final "s" is included in the blue link). Similarly [[Russia]]n, [[apocrypha]]l, [[logic]]al, [[hyphen]]ated, etc. Michael Hardy 02:23, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, I forgot about that. Still a rather minor point though. Wyllium 02:24, 2004 Nov 14 (UTC)

Hi there. I wanted to say that I strongly urge you to pull your nomination for deletion on List of movies, if you take a look you'll see two things. The list system for movies is much more comprehensive than the category system at this moment in time, (Ie containing settings for movies and such). There are also many red linked movies. This list seems to be important, as it has not yet been replaced by categories, at least for the time being. Deleting this would make it harder to browse wikipedia and to keep track of needed articles. siroχo 00:21, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

  • I'm confused. The list explicitly states that it is a list of articles, not of movies whether they have an article or not. That's is the reason I nominated it. Lists that contain items without articles I think are valuable, but I don't think that's the case here. Anyway, "pulling" my nomination is not an issue. I might vote keep myself if I change my mind, but it would be undemocratic if I pulled it when there are a lot of delete votes. Wyllium 07:12, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)

textfiles.com

Hi. Why did you list textfiles.com for deletion? I don't care about your petty conflict with ANSI artists and your vendetta against their articles, but textfiles.com is by no means VfD material. You may list it again and find out yourself. It has been in Wired, on Slashdot and in multiple other mainstream media. It has a page rank between 40 and 100 000 and has existed for 6 years.

Note that I am not affiliated with Textfiles.com, Jason Scott or any sort of scene, although they all interest me.

By all means, list the article for deletion again. I'd be very curious as to how you'd phrase it. — David Remahl 07:52, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • I have no idea what you mean with vendetta against ANSI artists. I listed Textfiles.com for one reason only, and that is that I have doubts about it's notability. If it is important enough there will be enough keep votes and you'll have nothing to worry about. Wyllium 07:56, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I confused you with someone else, I think. — David Remahl 08:00, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)