Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golaghat Gymkhana: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Golaghat Gymkhana. (TW) |
AnjanBorah (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Golaghat Gymkhana}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Golaghat Gymkhana}}) |
||
Non-notable club. Virtually zero hits on the search engines (except to the club's own website, and a single trivial mention on Books). Current sourcing consists solely of the trivial mention. [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 11:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
Non-notable club. Virtually zero hits on the search engines (except to the club's own website, and a single trivial mention on Books). Current sourcing consists solely of the trivial mention. [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 11:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
'''Oppose''' because Wikipedia is not based on # of search engine hits. The page has been updated with sources and it shows that the place has been mentioned in various travel journals, including [https://www.telegraphindia.com/1130429/jsp/northeast/story_16837726.jsp#.WGr3r7aLQcg this artcile ] in [[The Telegraph (Calcutta)|The Telegraph]] ''(an Indian national broadsheet newspaper)''. The current page in its structure is a credible Wikipedia article. [[User:AnjanBorah|AnjanBorah]] ([[User talk:AnjanBorah|talk]]) 01:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:40, 3 January 2017
- Golaghat Gymkhana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable club. Virtually zero hits on the search engines (except to the club's own website, and a single trivial mention on Books). Current sourcing consists solely of the trivial mention. Onel5969 TT me 11:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose because Wikipedia is not based on # of search engine hits. The page has been updated with sources and it shows that the place has been mentioned in various travel journals, including this artcile in The Telegraph (an Indian national broadsheet newspaper). The current page in its structure is a credible Wikipedia article. AnjanBorah (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)