User talk:Mtobadegg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:37, 5 January 2017

Welcome!

So hey, this is where you make my notifications and everything, which I get a lot of, sorry I'm a big idiot. But After I read them and make my thing or whatever, I will delete it. Thnx! [Like you cared, though] JackBadEgg (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is extra space =)

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mtobadegg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Samtar Please Respond!!!!!!!!!! My reason is first of all, why did you block me, second of all: I WILL NEVER MAKE A DISRUPTIVE EDIT AGAIN. PLEASEEEE GIVE ME ONE MORE CHANCE!Also, it was just a directory in case they mistyped!I mean, gee, what's wrong with that?

Decline reason:

You say you can't see you've made disruptive edits, and then in the same sentence say you won't "make a disruptive edit again". Which one is it? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 15:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've only once made a disruptive edit, and that was when I didn't know much,so it wasn't right.PLEASE LET ME EDIT AGAIN! JackBadEgg (talk) 16:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 == Unblock request ==
-{{unblock reviewed|reason=Your reason here My reason is first of all, why did you block me, second of all: I WILL NEVER MAKE A DISRUPTIVE EDIT AGAIN. PLEASEEEE GIVE ME ONE MORE CHANCE!Also, it was just a directory in case they mistyped!I mean,gee, what's wrong with that?|decline=You say you can't see you've made disruptive edits, and then in the '''same sentence''' say you won't "make a disruptive edit again". Which one is it? -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 15:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)}}
+{{unblock reviewed|reason=Samtar Please Respond!!!!!!!!!! My reason is first of all, why did you block me, second of all: I WILL NEVER MAKE A DISRUPTIVE EDIT AGAIN. PLEASEEEE GIVE ME ONE MORE CHANCE!Also, it was just a directory in case they mistyped!I mean, gee, what's wrong with that?|decline=You say you can't see you've made disruptive edits, and then in the '''same sentence''' say you won't "make a disruptive edit again". Which one is it? -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 15:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)}}
 :I've only once made a disruptive edit, and that was when I didn't know much,so it wasn't right.PLEASE LET ME EDIT AGAIN! [[User:Mtobadegg|JackBadEgg]] ([[User talk:Mtobadegg#top|talk]]) 16:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
-SAMTAR!!
-LET ME EDIT!!!!!!!!