Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Carnaille: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' in agreement with {{u|Mduvekot}}, incomprehensible mess of artspeak is pretty much dead on and I'm not sure what in the article establishes notability. <span style="background:#957;padding:2px 12px;font-size:12px">[[User:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#CC0">Chrissymad</span>]] <span style="color:#FC0;letter-spacing:-2px">❯❯❯</span> [[User talk:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#CC0">¯\_(ツ)_/¯</span>]]</span>
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Quentin Carnaille]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Quentin Carnaille]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

Revision as of 12:00, 6 January 2017

Quentin Carnaille (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interesting work, but I don't see how he is yet notable DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. Mduvekot (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete in agreement with Mduvekot, incomprehensible mess of artspeak is pretty much dead on and I'm not sure what in the article establishes notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]