Jump to content

The Indian Antiquary: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
CE
Line 6: Line 6:


==History==
==History==
The journal was founded by the archaeologist [[James Burgess (archaeologist)|James Burgess]] [[Order of the Indian Empire|CIE]] as a private venture,<ref name=Temp>[[Richard Carnac Temple|Temple, Richard Carnac]]. (1922) ''[https://archive.org/details/fiftyyearsofthei00temprich Fifty years of The Indian Antiquary]''. Mazgaon, Bombay: B. Miller, British India Press, p. 3.</ref> though no contributor or editor was ever paid for their work and the editors of the journal often had to support the publication out of their own pockets.<ref name="Temple, pp. 3-4"/> Burgess was the first editor and he continued in that role until the end of 1884 when failing eyesight forced him to hand over to John Faithfull Fleet and [[Richard Carnac Temple]].<ref name=Temp/>
The journal was founded by the archaeologist [[James Burgess (archaeologist)|James Burgess]] [[Order of the Indian Empire|CIE]]
It was a private venture,<ref name=Temp>[[Richard Carnac Temple|Temple, Richard Carnac]]. (1922) ''[https://archive.org/details/fiftyyearsofthei00temprich Fifty years of The Indian Antiquary]''. Mazgaon, Bombay: B. Miller, British India Press, p. 3.</ref> though no contributor or editor was ever paid for their work and the editors of the journal often had to support the publication out of their own pockets.<ref name="Temple, pp. 3-4"/> Burgess was the first editor and he continued in that role until the end of 1884 when failing eyesight forced him to hand over to John Faithfull Fleet and [[Richard Carnac Temple]].<ref name=Temp/>


The late nineteenth century was marked by a great increase in the number of local historical societies in India and a similar increase in the number of Indians who could speak and write English, to the extent that by the 1920s the entire journal could have been filled with work by Indian contributors.<ref name="Temple, p. 7"/> Volumes for 1925 to 1932 were published under the authority of the Council of the [[Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland|Royal Anthropological Institute]] (1933, not).<ref name=sun/> The first incarnation of the ''Antiquary'' ceased publication in 1933 with volume 62, number 783 (Dec. 1933),<ref name=sun>[http://suncat.ac.uk/serials/SC00623823801/all ''Indian antiquary''.] Suncat. Retrieved 10 January 2017.</ref> two years after Richard Temple's death in 1931.<ref name="odnb">{{cite web |title=Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, second baronet (1850–1931), army officer and oriental scholar |first=R. E. |last=Enthoven |authorlink=Reginald Edward Enthoven |others=Revised by Jones, M. G. M. |work=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36453 |accessdate=10 January 2017}} {{ODNBsub}}</ref>
The late nineteenth century was marked by a great increase in the number of local historical societies in India and a similar increase in the number of Indians who could speak and write English, to the extent that by the 1920s the entire journal could have been filled with work by Indian contributors.<ref name="Temple, p. 7"/> Volumes for 1925 to 1932 were published under the authority of the Council of the [[Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland|Royal Anthropological Institute]] (1933, not).<ref name=sun/> The first incarnation of the ''Antiquary'' ceased publication in 1933 with volume 62, number 783 (Dec. 1933),<ref name=sun>[http://suncat.ac.uk/serials/SC00623823801/all ''Indian antiquary''.] Suncat. Retrieved 10 January 2017.</ref> two years after Richard Temple's death in 1931.<ref name="odnb">{{cite web |title=Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, second baronet (1850–1931), army officer and oriental scholar |first=R. E. |last=Enthoven |authorlink=Reginald Edward Enthoven |others=Revised by Jones, M. G. M. |work=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36453 |accessdate=10 January 2017}} {{ODNBsub}}</ref>

Revision as of 21:02, 10 January 2017

Cover page of a 1931 edition of The Indian Antiquary

The Indian Antiquary, A journal of oriental research in archaeology, history, literature, language, philosophy, religion, folklore, &c, &c, (subtitle varies) was a journal of original research relating to India, published between 1872 and 1933. The journal was designed to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India.[1][2]

History

The journal was founded by the archaeologist James Burgess CIE

It was a private venture,[3] though no contributor or editor was ever paid for their work and the editors of the journal often had to support the publication out of their own pockets.[4] Burgess was the first editor and he continued in that role until the end of 1884 when failing eyesight forced him to hand over to John Faithfull Fleet and Richard Carnac Temple.[3]

The late nineteenth century was marked by a great increase in the number of local historical societies in India and a similar increase in the number of Indians who could speak and write English, to the extent that by the 1920s the entire journal could have been filled with work by Indian contributors.[5] Volumes for 1925 to 1932 were published under the authority of the Council of the Royal Anthropological Institute (1933, not).[6] The first incarnation of the Antiquary ceased publication in 1933 with volume 62, number 783 (Dec. 1933),[6] two years after Richard Temple's death in 1931.[7]

The New Indian Antiquary was published between 1938[8] and 1947, and the Indian Antiquary (described as the "third series") between 1964 and 1971.[9] (Volumes 14 to 62 of the original Antiquary were described as the "second series".)

Content

The journal had an archaeological and historical focus, and in the late nineteenth century that naturally meant that epigraphy (the study of inscriptions as writing rather than as literature) would be one of the principal subjects covered in its pages.[10] Indeed, the Antiquary was the premier source of European scholarship on Indian epigraphy until the twentieth century and the official Indian government journal of epigraphy, the Epigraphia Indica, was published as a quarterly supplement to the Antiquary between 1892 and 1920.[4]

The Antiquary was printed at Mazgaon, Bombay, by the Bombay Education Society and later the British India Press, but illustrations were produced in London by the firm of Griggs who were known for the accuracy of their work.[11] A high standard of reproduction was essential so that scholars could work on the epigraphic material without needing to see the originals.[11] Illustrations in the Antiquary were used by scholars such as Bhandarkar, Bhagvanlal Indraji, Georg Bühler, John Faithfull Fleet, Eggeling and B. Lewis Rice to decipher important inscriptions,[12] which in many cases remain the definitive translations to this day.[10]

Over one thousand plates were included in The Indian Antiquary and the Epigraphia Indica over the first fifty years of publication, but having the illustrations produced abroad was not without its disadvantages. On one occasion during World War I, enemy action meant that expensive plates had to be sent from London three times before they reached Bombay safely.[11]

Another area where the Antiquary led was in recording folklore and folktales. Its publication of Punjab folktales proved to be the first attempt to classify the events on which folk tales were based[5] and the pioneering work on north Indian folklore of William Crooke and Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube was printed in its pages.[13]

Reprints

Some volumes of the journal were reprinted by Swati Publications, Delhi, 1984.[14]

References

  1. ^ Prospectus in The Indian Antiquary, Part 1, 5 January 1872, p. 1.
  2. ^ "The Indian Antiquary" in The Antiquaries Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, April 1922, p. 148.
  3. ^ a b Temple, Richard Carnac. (1922) Fifty years of The Indian Antiquary. Mazgaon, Bombay: B. Miller, British India Press, p. 3.
  4. ^ a b Temple, pp. 3–4.
  5. ^ a b Temple, p. 7.
  6. ^ a b Indian antiquary. Suncat. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  7. ^ Enthoven, R. E. "Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, second baronet (1850–1931), army officer and oriental scholar". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Revised by Jones, M. G. M. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 10 January 2017. (subscription or UK public library membership required)
  8. ^ New Indian Antiquary South Asia Archive, 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  9. ^ British Library catalogue search 29 May 2014.
  10. ^ a b Salomon, Richard (1998). Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 219. ISBN 978-0-19-535666-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ a b c Temple, p. 6.
  12. ^ History Archaeological Survey of India, 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  13. ^ "Introduction" by Sadhana Naithani in William Crooke; Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube (2002). Folktales from Northern India. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-57607-698-9.
  14. ^ The Indian Antiquary. Open Library. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Indian_Antiquary&oldid=759382981"