Jump to content

User talk:Tyhappy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
General note: Frequent or mass changes to genres without consensus or references. (TW)
Line 51: Line 51:
Please give reasons when you want to make changes to the articles, and if other people object, do discuss it first to get a consensus. The reason I reverted your edits is because there is a convention that surname should be used rather than first names in articles per [[MOS:SURNAME]]. It is uncertain when in the show their first names are used, but unless this has been clarified it would be preferable to use full names. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 14:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Please give reasons when you want to make changes to the articles, and if other people object, do discuss it first to get a consensus. The reason I reverted your edits is because there is a convention that surname should be used rather than first names in articles per [[MOS:SURNAME]]. It is uncertain when in the show their first names are used, but unless this has been clarified it would be preferable to use full names. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 14:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
: [[MOS:SURNAME]] doesn't apply in this instance; moreover, the competitors are identified by their first names both in voice-over and in graphics. --[[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 02:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
: [[MOS:SURNAME]] doesn't apply in this instance; moreover, the competitors are identified by their first names both in voice-over and in graphics. --[[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 02:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

== January 2017 ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. Some of your recent [[genre]] changes have conflicted with our [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and [[Wikipedia:verifiability|verifiability]] policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-genre1 --> [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Green;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 09:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:23, 21 January 2017

You have been blocked.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MasterChef (U.S. season 6), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MasterChef (U.S. season 6), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hodge-podge and Strawberry shortcake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MasterChef Canada (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Togarashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm SanAnMan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to MasterChef (U.S. season 7)‎ has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read WP:TVPLOT, specifically: "The plot summary is an overview of the episode's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes and technical detail." SanAnMan (talk) 17:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Leaky Caldron 22:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Leaky Caldron 23:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tyhappy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Great British Bake Off

Please give reasons when you want to make changes to the articles, and if other people object, do discuss it first to get a consensus. The reason I reverted your edits is because there is a convention that surname should be used rather than first names in articles per MOS:SURNAME. It is uncertain when in the show their first names are used, but unless this has been clarified it would be preferable to use full names. Hzh (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:SURNAME doesn't apply in this instance; moreover, the competitors are identified by their first names both in voice-over and in graphics. --Drmargi (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 09:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]