Jump to content

User talk:Vanamonde93/Archive 11: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:Vanamonde93) (bot
m Archiving 3 discussion(s) from User talk:Vanamonde93) (bot
Line 130: Line 130:


The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Dublin Regulation#rfc_851FB28|this request for comment on '''Talk:Dublin Regulation''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 59765 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Dublin Regulation#rfc_851FB28|this request for comment on '''Talk:Dublin Regulation''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 59765 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

== Slum Soccer Deletion ==

As you deleted the Slum Soccer Article due to in your opinion promotion, please explain me in detail, where promotional content was.
I was only showing in this high quality article how Slum Soccer is working. For the reason they are doing an amazing job, the content of the article seems to be promotional. but it was only the pure working truth. Please show me where promotional content was. [[User:Constantin Masch|Constantin Masch]] ([[User talk:Constantin Masch|talk]]) 11:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
:Please read the links I've posted on your page. As a good rule of thumb, though, everything you write here needs to be supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]: when we abandon those and write just "what we know," neutrality issues crop up. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93#top|talk]]) 11:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

== About the deleted article [[Archiam Centre]]: I disagree with the deletion reason, but agree that it should be deleted. ==

Hi Vanamonde93,<br/>

You [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Archiam_Centre deleted] the article under the [[WP:G11]] rationale.<br/>
I was looking for reliable third references for that that article, and was about to suggest a [[WP:AFD]] based on the evidence that the "Archiam Centre" was an offshoot of [[Nottingham Trent University]]'s [http://www4.ntu.ac.uk/apps/research/groups/22/home.aspx/centre/143426/overview/centre_for_architecture_heritage_and_global_difference_(ahgd)#projects Centre for Architecture, Heritage and Global Difference] project.<br/> So: Nottingham Trent University has a project called "Centre for Architecture, Heritage and Global Difference" One of its sub-projects included [http://www4.ntu.ac.uk/apps/research/groups/22/home.aspx/project/143443/overview/archiam_project The ArCHIAM Project].

All that said. maybe there could be a carefully written article about this maybe notable topic with references from impeccably reliable sources.

Your thoughts about this?

Pete AU aka --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 11:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Shirt58}} [[WP:CSD#G11|G11]] is one of the deletion criteria that actually has very little to do with notability; all it says is that the article is so unsuitable for Wikipedia that it needs to be deleted. If a well-written article ''can'' be written about the subject, then write one by all means. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93#top|talk]]) 11:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


==About the deleted article [[PriceWeber]]==
Hi! You flagged an article for PriceWeber for speedy deletion, and it has since been taken down. I am new to posting on Wikipedia, so any policy violation was completely unintentional. Do you have any advice on how to write an article that won't be eligible for deletion in the future? I'm planning on rewriting the one that you tagged, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! [[User:LTaylor197|LTaylor197]] ([[User talk:LTaylor197|talk]]) 15:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|LTaylor197}} Thanks for approaching this in the right spirit. First off, you have to check whether the subject you wish to write about is actually [[WP:N|notable]], and whether that can be demonstrated through the use of [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Beyond that, a page must comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NPOV]], which you should also read. I see that somebody has posted a welcome template on your talk page: just go through those links thoroughly, and you will be in decent shape. Regards, [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93#top|talk]]) 16:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:51, 14 February 2017

Archive 5Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 15

Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Thank you, Class455, and the same to you. Vanamonde (talk) 12:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. It's the section "False allegation on disruptive editing, admins take initiative". The filer of the report did not notify you, so I do so. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Coming of Age in Karhide

The article Coming of Age in Karhide you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Coming of Age in Karhide for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))

Request for your view...

You are requested to kindly opine at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 as an editor who has an active interest in India-related articles and discussions.ThanksLight❯❯❯ Saber 10:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in South Dakota, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Address Collection - 1st reminder

Hi there. At the moment we have not received your response on the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your mailing address (not the email) via this google form. This form is only accessed by me and your username will not distribute to the local community to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems of using the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.

If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let me know at my meta talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Addis Wang, sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Operation PBFORTUNE

On 30 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation PBFORTUNE, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation PBFORTUNE, organized by the CIA to topple Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz, was terminated when the coup attempt became too widely known? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation PBFORTUNE. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Operation PBFORTUNE), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Vanamonde93!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thanks, Class455! The same to you and yours. Vanamonde (talk) 11:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Vanamonde93!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thanks, Donner60! A happy new year to you, too. Vanamonde (talk) 11:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Kosem Sultan's relatives

Gülbahar (Kösem Sultan's Sister) and Yasemin (Kösem Sultan's Sister) cancelled. Please, open pages. This people are real. Sources:

1 http://www.mixanitouxronou.gr/i-ellinida-kori-tou-papa-pou-egine-soultana-ke-kivernise-tin-othomaniki-aftokratoria-tin-eroteftike-parafora-o-soultanos-achmet-a-ke-ton-voithise-na-chtisi-to-ble-tzami/

2 http://www.iefimerida.gr/news/89252/o-ελληνας-εραστής-του-σουλειμάν-του-μεγαλοπρεπούς

3 http://www.protothema.gr/life-style/article/481197/mia-ellinida-soultana-katakta-tin-tourkia/

4 http://www.ekriti.gr/ειδήσεις-διεθνή-ψυχαγωγία-back-stage/η-χουρέμ-επιστρέφει-ως-κιοσέμ-σουλτάν

5 http://www.espressonews.gr/showbiz/2015/11/143042/i-soyltana-kiosem-apo-ti-hio

6

http://www.pelop.gr/?page=article&DocID=242964  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulmerruhtan (talkcontribs) 08:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC) 
@Sulmerruhtan: I'm afraid that something being "real" is not enough for it to have an article on Wikipedia. I myself am decidedly real, but there is no article about me. You need to demonstrate that the subject of an article is notable, through the use of reliable sources. Also, please read WP:NOTINHERITED. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Hardcore punk

The IP and I talked about the stuff on the hardcore punk article and we agree on something. Statik N (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

@Statik N: Okay, I've taken a look at the discussion, and unprotected the page; if the editing degenerates again, though, full protection may be needed agian. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 06:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Ivan V. Polyakov article

Hi, Vanamonde93. I've recreated the article you deleted as a draft. It's a little bit strange to me that it was deleted as I provided all answers to the person who did the initial moderation of the article and corrected the article according to his comments. Please check the draft and if you have any comments I'll be more than happy to correct the article. Also, please be informed that this article os a translation of the article in Russian segment. Best regards, Ivp.office (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

When I came across the article, it was certainly too promotional in nature to be in mainspace. Recreating it in draft-space is fine, as long as you are using the draft to bring the piece in line with WP:NPOV, and not simply to store something that would not survive in mainspace. Vanamonde (talk) 08:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dublin Regulation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dublin Regulation. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Slum Soccer Deletion

As you deleted the Slum Soccer Article due to in your opinion promotion, please explain me in detail, where promotional content was. I was only showing in this high quality article how Slum Soccer is working. For the reason they are doing an amazing job, the content of the article seems to be promotional. but it was only the pure working truth. Please show me where promotional content was. Constantin Masch (talk) 11:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please read the links I've posted on your page. As a good rule of thumb, though, everything you write here needs to be supported by reliable sources: when we abandon those and write just "what we know," neutrality issues crop up. Vanamonde (talk) 11:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

About the deleted article Archiam Centre: I disagree with the deletion reason, but agree that it should be deleted.

Hi Vanamonde93,

You deleted the article under the WP:G11 rationale.
I was looking for reliable third references for that that article, and was about to suggest a WP:AFD based on the evidence that the "Archiam Centre" was an offshoot of Nottingham Trent University's Centre for Architecture, Heritage and Global Difference project.
So: Nottingham Trent University has a project called "Centre for Architecture, Heritage and Global Difference" One of its sub-projects included The ArCHIAM Project.

All that said. maybe there could be a carefully written article about this maybe notable topic with references from impeccably reliable sources.

Your thoughts about this?

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

@Shirt58: G11 is one of the deletion criteria that actually has very little to do with notability; all it says is that the article is so unsuitable for Wikipedia that it needs to be deleted. If a well-written article can be written about the subject, then write one by all means. Vanamonde (talk) 11:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


About the deleted article PriceWeber

Hi! You flagged an article for PriceWeber for speedy deletion, and it has since been taken down. I am new to posting on Wikipedia, so any policy violation was completely unintentional. Do you have any advice on how to write an article that won't be eligible for deletion in the future? I'm planning on rewriting the one that you tagged, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! LTaylor197 (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

@LTaylor197: Thanks for approaching this in the right spirit. First off, you have to check whether the subject you wish to write about is actually notable, and whether that can be demonstrated through the use of reliable sources. Beyond that, a page must comply with WP:V and WP:NPOV, which you should also read. I see that somebody has posted a welcome template on your talk page: just go through those links thoroughly, and you will be in decent shape. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 16:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)