Jump to content

Talk:2010 Copiapó mining accident: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:46, 16 February 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 3 months

2010 Copiapó mining accident was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 28, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 24, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that around 2,000 members of the media from around the world traveled to the site of the rescue of the Chilean miners?

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on August 23, 2010.

A news item involving 2010 Copiapó mining accident was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 October 2010.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 13, 2011.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mining High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Occupational Safety and Health High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Chile Mid‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Latin America Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Philg88, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 29, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

To-do list for 2010 Copiapó mining accident: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2010-11-19

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : *Research and start an 'Executive critique of government handling' of the entire event section
- keep an eye out for investigation and litigation status updates in the news
- Maintain : *Continue to cleanup "Corporate" and "Contributions to Miners" sections in "Reactions" daughter article
- Update Miners Post-Rescue section with current news
- Update Reaction to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident
- Update 'Survival' section as news comes available
- Update 'Social Impact' section (films, books, spokesman, etc. arrangements that arise
- Photo : Need more pics like these:
- Campo Esperanza images
- Press scrum at the camp images
- Celebration images
- Stubs : *Several stubs/articles that directly support this article need improvement
- Other : *Figure out why this list tool has formatting issues

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 3 months

Water use (drilling)

Two of the three drill rigs required a great deal of water to operate, in the driest desert in the world. No mention is made of the water truck runs from a rare lake some distance away nor the ensuing environmental discussion on the impact of this much water into this area. I recall reading and seeing this discussion at the time, but am not able to do the research right now to append the articles on rescue to include this. At least one supporting article refers to the potential 70,000 liters of water inundating the mine and miners if one of the drills gets through (Drill C probably) [1]. Drill B, the successful one, did not require water to cool the drill.

(I'm listening to the audiobook version of Deep Dark Down, hence my current (renewed) interest. Audio books are great, except for the missing illustrations.) GeeBee60 (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is a “copper–gold mine”?

The first paragraph says “the troubled 121-year-old San José copper–gold mine”.

What is exactly a “copper–gold mine”? A mine where both copper and gold are extracted? It would be clearer to write ”copper and gold mine”. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2010 Copiapó mining accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Plan B

The "boreholes that were already keeping the miners supplied with palomas" doesn't seem correct. "[palomas]" is an alcoholic drink. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paloma_(cocktail) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the chilean miners miracals how faith helped them survive

today im here witnissing an actual miracale 33 man survived a tragic collapas the names are

san jose jimmy sanchez omar reygado samuel avalos acuna alex vega salazan jaun illanes ariel ticona yanez pablo rojas rillacorta2606:A000:4443:2100:E0AA:85E1:1121:80BA (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_Copiapó_mining_accident&oldid=765856789"

Hidden categories: