Jump to content

User talk:24.55.93.83: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 19: Line 19:


== Not an Apology ==
== Not an Apology ==
You need to read [[MOS:DATERANGE]]. Years are spelt out in full when space is not an issue, as in most infoboxes if the years are the only thing in the recorded parameter. Also, you de-capitalised the I in "Is" in a song title, which is against [[MOS:CT]]. <b><font color="#FF6347">[[User:Ss112|Ss]]</font><small><font color="#1E90FF">[[User talk:Ss112|112]]</font></small></b> 07:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Per your edits to [[Not an Apology]], you need to read [[MOS:DATERANGE]]. Years are spelt out in full when space is not an issue, as in most infoboxes if the years are the only thing in the recorded parameter. Also, you de-capitalised the I in "Is" in a song title, which is against [[MOS:CT]]. <b><font color="#FF6347">[[User:Ss112|Ss]]</font><small><font color="#1E90FF">[[User talk:Ss112|112]]</font></small></b> 07:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:39, 19 February 2017

Great job!

Hi! Thank you so much for the cleanup at Allow Me to Reintroduce Myself! You really caught some mistakes that I missed. You might want to create an account. Check this out for some info on why you should create an account. Once again thank you for your productive contributions to Wikipedia! Regards, Jith12 (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 123.136.111.63 (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Per the MOS (MOS:NUMBERSIGN), "No." is just as valid a term for "number". There is no reason to change it. Additionally, in regards to your recent edits to Flume song articles, it is not necessary to always specify "number" in front of an actual figure if it is obvious from context what is being talked about, especially in a sentence that reads "reached its peak of 57". Ss112 23:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at What So Not.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is not required or necessary to change "No." to "number". This is allowable per the MOS. Don't just ignore what other editors tell you. Ss112 01:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to Adrian Marcel. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Not an Apology

Per your edits to Not an Apology, you need to read MOS:DATERANGE. Years are spelt out in full when space is not an issue, as in most infoboxes if the years are the only thing in the recorded parameter. Also, you de-capitalised the I in "Is" in a song title, which is against MOS:CT. Ss112 07:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]