Auckland Animal Action: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 172.111.222.17 (talk) to last version by InternetArchiveBot |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
AAA oppose possum fur marketed as eco-friendly. This policy was accompanied by protests at the 2005 New Zealand Fashion Week. Rochelle Rees from AAA believes: "...the promotion of possum fur would lead to an unsustainable demand, as it had with rabbits and foxes."<ref name="NZ_Herald_10350398">{{cite web |url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id=42&ObjectID=10350398 |title=Fur set to fly as designers targeted |author=Kiong, Errol |date=15 October 2005 |work=[[The New Zealand Herald]] |accessdate=17 September 2011}}</ref> In 2005 Auckland Animal Action launched a campaign against possum fur. |
AAA oppose possum fur marketed as eco-friendly. This policy was accompanied by protests at the 2005 New Zealand Fashion Week. Rochelle Rees from AAA believes: "...the promotion of possum fur would lead to an unsustainable demand, as it had with rabbits and foxes."<ref name="NZ_Herald_10350398">{{cite web |url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id=42&ObjectID=10350398 |title=Fur set to fly as designers targeted |author=Kiong, Errol |date=15 October 2005 |work=[[The New Zealand Herald]] |accessdate=17 September 2011}}</ref> In 2005 Auckland Animal Action launched a campaign against possum fur. |
||
Criticism of AAA’s anti-possum fur policy comes from [[David Farrar (blogger)|David Farrar]] who says, "I see the Auckland Animal Action Group justify their opposition to use of possum fur, because "to wear a dead animal's skin is disrespectful to the animal". Well killing our trees is disrespectful also, and the possums started it!"<ref>[http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2004/10/save_the_possums_darling.html Save the possums darling!], 28 October 2004, [[Kiwiblog]]. Retrieved on 22 May 2011. |
Criticism of AAA’s anti-possum fur policy comes from [[David Farrar (blogger)|David Farrar]] who says, "I see the Auckland Animal Action Group justify their opposition to use of possum fur, because "to wear a dead animal's skin is disrespectful to the animal". Well killing our trees is disrespectful also, and the possums started it!"<ref>[http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2004/10/save_the_possums_darling.html Save the possums darling!], 28 October 2004, [[Kiwiblog]]. Retrieved on 22 May 2011.</ref> |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
Revision as of 21:49, 23 February 2017
Auckland Animal Action (AAA) was formed in August 1996 by a small group of people seeing the need for a grassroots activist group that promoted direct action against all forms of animal abuse. Since then, AAA has run campaigns against all forms of animal abuse, most notably the Fur Free Auckland campaign.
Factory Farming
AAA has also been active against factory farming. Actions have included investigations into alleged factory farms, protests outside these farms and campaigns against companies, including Tegel Foods Limited.
AAA also promotes and organises the media coverage for investigations carried out by underground groups. In January 2007 AAA received nationwide media coverage for an investigation and release of animals carried out by the Animal Liberation Front.[1]
Civil Disobedience
AAA was the first animal liberation group in NZ to start using civil disobedience (CD) in campaigning against what they believe is animal suffering and abuse.[citation needed] In 2003 AAA used Civil Disobedience in their campaign against Harpers Fashion's sale of fur products. Members of AAA chained themselves to the door of the Hartley’s store in High Street.[citation needed]
Possum Fur Campaign
AAA oppose possum fur marketed as eco-friendly. This policy was accompanied by protests at the 2005 New Zealand Fashion Week. Rochelle Rees from AAA believes: "...the promotion of possum fur would lead to an unsustainable demand, as it had with rabbits and foxes."[2] In 2005 Auckland Animal Action launched a campaign against possum fur.
Criticism of AAA’s anti-possum fur policy comes from David Farrar who says, "I see the Auckland Animal Action Group justify their opposition to use of possum fur, because "to wear a dead animal's skin is disrespectful to the animal". Well killing our trees is disrespectful also, and the possums started it!"[3]
See also
References
- ^ "Chicken farm conditions "shocking"". One News. 13 January 2007. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- ^ Kiong, Errol (15 October 2005). "Fur set to fly as designers targeted". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- ^ Save the possums darling!, 28 October 2004, Kiwiblog. Retrieved on 22 May 2011.