User talk:Lrive133/sandbox: Difference between revisions
←Created page with '==Prof Garcia's Comments== ==Week 2== Great job with your analysis of the Cazales page! I think you will be able to add a considerable amount to the article, w...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Great job with your analysis of the Cazales page! I think you will be able to add a considerable amount to the article, which is good. Your answers on the content gap, on the other hand, were pretty mediocre. Please write much more for future assignments. You have to be thorough with your answers. [[User:Alfgarciamora|Alfgarciamora]] ([[User talk:Alfgarciamora|talk]]) 20:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
Great job with your analysis of the Cazales page! I think you will be able to add a considerable amount to the article, which is good. Your answers on the content gap, on the other hand, were pretty mediocre. Please write much more for future assignments. You have to be thorough with your answers. [[User:Alfgarciamora|Alfgarciamora]] ([[User talk:Alfgarciamora|talk]]) 20:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
==Peer Review== |
|||
Your article shows a severe lack of information and from what I can see you've already more than doubled amount of information presented. The expanded lead section provides a nicer overview but as it is a lead section that should provide a summary you should include Cazalès relation to the monarchy in some sense since that seems to be a major topic to the article. It seems you can also separate the early life into another section, one about his education. So far you've done an astounding job with what you ere given, keep up the good work! |
|||
[[User:Pnick ramirez2097|Pnick ramirez2097]] ([[User talk:Pnick ramirez2097|talk]]) 04:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:07, 27 February 2017
Prof Garcia's Comments
Week 2
Great job with your analysis of the Cazales page! I think you will be able to add a considerable amount to the article, which is good. Your answers on the content gap, on the other hand, were pretty mediocre. Please write much more for future assignments. You have to be thorough with your answers. Alfgarciamora (talk) 20:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review
Your article shows a severe lack of information and from what I can see you've already more than doubled amount of information presented. The expanded lead section provides a nicer overview but as it is a lead section that should provide a summary you should include Cazalès relation to the monarchy in some sense since that seems to be a major topic to the article. It seems you can also separate the early life into another section, one about his education. So far you've done an astounding job with what you ere given, keep up the good work! Pnick ramirez2097 (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)