Jump to content

Ferdinand Marcos: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 598: Line 598:
{{quote|We love your adherence to democratic principles and to the democratic process, and we will not leave you in isolation.|U.S. Vice President [[George H. W. Bush]] during Ferdinand E. Marcos inauguration|June 1981<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,953029,00.html | work=Time | title=Philippines: Together Again | date=July 13, 1981}}</ref><ref name=BushMarcos group=lower-alpha />}}
{{quote|We love your adherence to democratic principles and to the democratic process, and we will not leave you in isolation.|U.S. Vice President [[George H. W. Bush]] during Ferdinand E. Marcos inauguration|June 1981<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,953029,00.html | work=Time | title=Philippines: Together Again | date=July 13, 1981}}</ref><ref name=BushMarcos group=lower-alpha />}}


On June 16, 1981, six months after the lifting of martial law, the [[Philippine presidential election and referendum, 1981|first presidential election in twelve years]] was held. President Marcos ran and won a massive victory over the other candidates.<ref name="Steinberg">{{cite book|title=The Philippines: a singular and a plural place |first=David Joel |last=Steinberg|publisher=Westview Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-8133-3755-5 |page=135}}</ref> The major opposition parties, the [[United Nationalists Democratic Organizations]] (UNIDO), a coalition of opposition parties and LABAN, boycotted the elections.
On June 16, 1981, six months after the lifting of martial law, the [[Philippine presidential election and referendum, 1981|first presidential election in twelve years]] was held. President Marcos ran and won a massive victory over the other candidates.<ref name="Steinberg">{{cite book|title=The Philippines: a singular and a plural place |first=David Joel |last=Steinberg|publisher=Westview Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-8133-3755-5 |page=135}}</ref> The major opposition parties, the [[United Nationalists Democratic Organizations]] (UNIDO), a coalition of opposition parties and LABAN, boycotted the elections.The opposition parties boycotted the election because all of the martial law decrees were still in place and the opposition was not allowed to campaign. They felt that their participation would legitimize the regime.<ref>http://www.academia.edu/7968626/LUTONG_MACOY_Philippine_Elections_under_the_Marcos_Regime_Comparisons_and_Lessons_for_Today</ref>


After the lifting of Martial Law, the pressure on the Communist CPP-NPA alleviated. The group able to return to urban areas and form relationships with legal opposition organizations, and became increasingly successful attacks against the government throughout the country.<ref name="web.stanford.edu"/> The violence inflicted by the communists reached its peak in 1985 with 1,282 military and police deaths and 1,362 civilian deaths.<ref name="web.stanford.edu"/>
After the lifting of Martial Law, the pressure on the Communist CPP-NPA alleviated. The group able to return to urban areas and form relationships with legal opposition organizations, and became increasingly successful attacks against the government throughout the country.<ref name="web.stanford.edu"/> The violence inflicted by the communists reached its peak in 1985 with 1,282 military and police deaths and 1,362 civilian deaths.<ref name="web.stanford.edu"/>

Revision as of 09:22, 28 February 2017

Ferdinand Marcos
Marcos in 1982.
10th President of the Philippines
In office
December 30, 1965 – February 25, 1986
Prime MinisterHimself (1978–1981)
Cesar Virata (1981–1986)
Vice PresidentFernando López (1965–1973)
Preceded byDiosdado Macapagal
Succeeded byCorazon Aquino
3rd Prime Minister of the Philippines
In office
June 12, 1978 – June 30, 1981
Preceded byOffice established
(Position previously held by Jorge B. Vargas)
Succeeded byCesar Virata
Secretary of National Defense
In office
August 28, 1971 – January 3, 1972
PresidentHimself
Preceded byJuan Ponce Enrile
Succeeded byJuan Ponce Enrile
In office
December 31, 1965 – January 20, 1967
PresidentHimself
Preceded byMacario Peralta
Succeeded byErnesto Mata
11th President of the Senate of the Philippines
In office
April 5, 1963 – December 30, 1965
PresidentDiosdado Macapagal
Preceded byEulogio Rodriguez
Succeeded byArturo Tolentino
Senator of the Philippines
In office
December 30, 1959 – December 30, 1965
Member of the Philippine House of Representatives from Ilocos Norte's 2nd District
In office
December 30, 1949 – December 30, 1959
Preceded byPedro Albano
Succeeded bySimeon M. Valdez
Personal details
Born
Ferdinand Emmanuel Edralin Marcos

(1917-09-11)September 11, 1917
Sarrat, Ilocos Norte, Philippine Islands
DiedSeptember 28, 1989(1989-09-28) (aged 72)
Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.
Resting placeFerdinand E. Marcos Presidential Center, Batac, Ilocos Norte
(1993–2016)
Heroes' Cemetery, Taguig, Metro Manila
(since November 18, 2016)
Political partyKilusang Bagong Lipunan
Other political
affiliations
Liberal Party (1946–1965)
Nacionalista Party (1965–1978)
Spouse
(m. 1954)
Children4, notably Imee, Bongbong, and Irene
Alma materUniversity of the Philippines
Profession
Signature
Military service
Allegiance Philippine Commonwealth
Rank First lieutenant
Major Major
Unit11th Infantry Division (USAFFE)
14th Infantry Regiment (USAFIP-NL)
Battles/warsWorld War II

Ferdinand Emmanuel Edralin Marcos, Sr. (September 11, 1917 – September 28, 1989) was a Filipino politician[1][2][3][4] who was President of the Philippines from 1965 to 1986. He ruled as a dictator[5] under martial law from 1972 until 1981.[6] While his regime started an unprecedented number of infrastructure projects and monuments (known colloquially as an "edifice complex" and at great taxpayer cost),[7][8][9][10] it also became infamous for its corruption[11][12][13] and brutality.[14][15][16]

Prior to his presidency, Marcos started out as an attorney before serving as a member of the Philippine House of Representatives from 1949 to 1959 and of the Philippine Senate from 1959 to 1965, where he was also Senate President from 1963 to 1965. Marcos fought alongside the Americans during the Japanese invasion and participated in the Bataan Death March, and he later claimed during his election campaigns that he was "the most decorated war hero in the Philippines", a claim which was later proven to be false.[17][18][19] United States Army documents described the claim as "fraudulent" and "absurd".[20] However, President Fidel Ramos backed Marcos's claim that Marcos founded the anti-Japanese guerrilla group Maharlika and has mentioned in his presidential inaugural biography that his father Narciso Ramos served as one of the leaders of Marcos's guerrilla group.[21]

He was elected President in 1965. The Philippine national debt used to fund development projects grew from $2 billion at the beginning of his term to $26 billion by the end of 1985.[22][23][24][25] Based on World Bank data, Philippine Annual Gross Domestic Product grew from $5.27 billion in 1964 to $37.14 billion in 1982, a year prior to the assassination of Ninoy Aquino. Political instability in the wake of the Aquino assassination, unexpected drop in access to international credit and high interest rates, and difficulty in managing balance of payments position due to falling export prices[26][27] subsequently fueled a severe economic recession in 1984 and 1985.[28] By the end of 1985, GDP stood at $30.7 following two years of economic contraction. Some of Marcos's critics claimed that poverty incidence grew from 41% in the 1960s at the time Marcos took the Presidency to 59% when he was removed from power,[29] but academic research to measure poverty only began in the 1970s and poverty stats referred to by the Asian Development Bank pegged poverty incidence to 44% in 1985.[30][31] Philippine GDP per capita expressed in US$ more than quadrupled from $175.9 in 1964 to $741.8 in 1982, but subsequently fell to $565.8 in 1985 due to the recession from protectionism, neglect in manufacturing, crony capitalism and over-borrowing.[27][32][33] However, significantly contributing to the recession and elevated debt levels was a perfect storm of extremely high global interest rates,[34] severe global economic recession, and significant increase in global oil price, which affected all indebted countries in Latin America, Europe, and the Philippines was not exempted.[35][36] All in all despite the 1984–1985 recession, GDP per capita grew at an annualized rate of 5.8%, or more than tripled, from 1964 to 1985. It was only in 1992 at the beginning of the term of Fidel Ramos when GDP per capita, which amounted to $814 surpassed the previous peak GDP per capita achieved in 1982 during Marcos's term.[33]

Citing more than 15 bombing incidences and an intensifying armed communist insurgency,[37] Marcos placed the Philippines under martial law on September 23, 1972,[38][39][40] during which he revamped the constitution, silenced the media,[41] and used violence and oppression[16] against political opposition.[42] Martial law was ratified by 90.77% of the voters during the Philippine Martial Law referendum, 1973 though the referendum was marred with controversy.[43][44] According to The Washington Post in 1989, Communists plotted the 1971 Plaza Miranda bombing to provoke Marcos into cracking down his opponents, allowing them to increase recruits which were needed to make use of weapons and financial aid coming from China.[45]

A 1976 Amnesty International report had listed 88 government torturers, including members of the Philippine Constabulary and the Philippine Army, which was respectively under the direct control of Major General Fidel V. Ramos and Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile.[15][46] The Amnesty International mission team had discussions with "President Ferdinand E. Marcos, Secretary of National Defense Juan Ponce Enrile, Solicitor General Estelito P. Mendoza, Major General Fidel V. Ramos (Commanding General of The Philippine Constabulary), Brigadier General Guillermo Santos, Judge Advocate General of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and other senior officials" on the preparation of its report.[47][48]

Public outrage led to the snap elections of 1986. Allegations of mass cheating, political turmoil and excesses of human rights abuses led to the People Power Revolution in February 1986, which removed him from power.[49] To avoid what could have been a military confrontation in Manila between pro- and anti-Marcos troops, Marcos was advised by President Ronald Reagan through Sen. Paul Laxalt to "cut and cut cleanly",[50] after which Marcos fled to Hawaii.[51] Marcos was succeeded by Corazon (Cory) Aquino, widow of the assassinated opposition leader Senator Benigno (Ninoy) Aquino, Jr. who had flown back to the Philippines to face Marcos.[49][52][53][54]

According to source documents provided by the Presidential Commission on Good Government,[55][56][57] a government agency created by the Aquino Government,[58] the Marcos family had plundered $5–10 billion USD.[59] PCGG also maintained that the Marcos family enjoyed a decadent lifestyle—taking away billions of dollars[55][57] from the country[60][61] in the course of their US-backed rule between 1965 and 1986. His wife Imelda Marcos, whose excesses during the couple's kleptocracy[62][63][64] made her infamous in her own right, spawned the term "Imeldific".[14][65][66][67] Numerous criminal graft charges have been filed against her, some of which are still ongoing, and most have been dismissed by the court due to lack of evidence.[68] Due to this,[69] she was still active in Philippine politics along with two of her four children, Imee Marcos and Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.[57][70] Imelda Marcos claims that Ferdinand's wealth came from the gold treasure he had acquired before he became president;[68] the claim has been corroborated by testimonies in the Philippine Senate by businessman Enrique Zobel and by Marcelino Tagle, a former director of Caritas Manila and one of the nation's "Ten Outstanding Young Men' in 1967.[71][72]

Early life

Ferdinand Edralin Marcos was born on September 11, 1917, in the town of Sarrat, Ilocos Norte, to Mariano Marcos and Josefa Edralin.[73] He was later baptized into the Philippine Independent Church,[74] but was first baptized in the Roman Catholic Church at the age of three.

In December 1938, Ferdinand Marcos was prosecuted for the murder of Julio Nalundasan. He was not the only accused from the Marcos clan; also accused was his father, Mariano, his brother, Pio, and his brother-in-law Quirino Lizardo. Nalundasan, one of the elder Marcos's political rivals, had been shot and killed in his house in Batac on September 21, 1935 – the day after he had defeated Mariano Marcos a second time for a seat in the National Assembly.[75] According to two witnesses, the four had conspired to assassinate Nalundasan, with Ferdinand Marcos eventually pulling the trigger. In late January 1939, they were finally denied bail[76] and later in the year, they were convicted. Ferdinand and Lizardo received the death penalty for premeditated murder, while Mariano and Pio were found guilty of contempt of court. The Marcos family took their appeal to the Supreme Court of the Philippines, which overturned the lower court's decision on 22 October 1940, acquitting them of all charges except contempt.[77]

Marcos studied law at the University of the Philippines, attending the prestigious College of Law. He excelled in both curricular and extra-curricular activities, becoming a valuable member of the university's swimming, boxing, and wrestling teams. He was also an accomplished and prolific orator, debater, and writer for the student newspaper. He also became a member of the University of the Philippines ROTC Unit (UP Vanguard Fraternity) where he met some of his future cabinet members and Armed Forces Chiefs of Staff. When he sat for the 1939 Bar Examinations, he received[citation needed] a near-perfect score of 98.8%, although some have disputed this score. The Philippine Supreme Court felt justified in altering his scoring.[citation needed] He graduated cum laude despite the fact that he was incarcerated while reviewing.[citation needed] Had he not been in jail for 27 days, he would have graduated magna cum laude.[citation needed] He was elected to the Pi Gamma Mu and the Phi Kappa Phi international honor societies, the latter giving him its Most Distinguished Member Award 37 years later.[78]

In Seagrave's book The Marcos Dynasty, he mentioned that Marcos possessed a phenomenal memory and exhibited this by memorizing complicated texts and reciting them forward and backward, even such as the 1935 Constitution of the Philippines. Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, in an interview with the Philippine Star on March 25, 2012, shared her experience as a speech writer to President Marcos: "One time, the Secretary of Justice forgot to tell me that the President had requested him to draft a speech that the President was going to deliver before graduates of the law school. And then, on the day the President was to deliver the speech, he suddenly remembered because Malacañang was asking for the speech, so he said, 'This is an emergency. You just have to produce something.' And I just dictated the speech. He liked long speeches. I think that was 20 or 25 pages. And then, in the evening, I was there, of course. President Marcos recited the speech from memory."[79]

Personal life

He was married to Imelda Romualdez, on May 1, 1954 and the marriage produced three children:[80]

  1. Maria Imelda "Imee" Marcos (born 12 November 1955), Governor of Ilocos Norte
  2. Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. (born 13 September 1957), Senator of the Philippines
  3. Irene Marcos (born 16 September 1960)

His fourth child, Aimee Romualdez Marcos, was adopted and was a musician in 2012[81]

Ancestry

Marcos claimed that he was a descendant of Antonio Luna, a Filipino general during the Philippine–American War.[82] He also claimed that his ancestor was a 16th-century pirate Lim-A-Hong (Chinese: 林阿鳳) who used to raid the coasts of the South China Sea.[83][84]

Military career

The subject of Marcos's military career has been the subject of debate and controversy.[20][87] Before World War II, Marcos was already a Reserve Officers' Training Corps graduate during his time studying law.[88] Hours after the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 8, 1941, the Japanese simultaneously bombed many places in the Philippines, including Clark Field. The 14th Army began its invasion with a landing on Batan Island (not to be confused with Bataan Peninsula), 120 miles (190 km) off the north coast of Luzon on the same day, by selected naval infantry units. Landings on Camiguin Island and at Vigan, Aparri, and Gonzaga in northern Luzon followed two days later.[89] Marcos was one of those who were called into the army as a 3rd lieutenant during the mobilization in the summer and fall of 1941. The U.S. Army has confirmed that Ferdinand Marcos fought on the U.S. side after the December 1941 Japanese invasion of the Philippines until April 1942, before being taken prisoner.[88] He also had records showing that he fought on the American side again from December 1944 until the end of the war.

Marcos would be one of the 78,000 Filipino and American troops who surrendered at Bataan on April 9, 1942, four months after the Japanese initiated their invasion of the Philippines. He survived the Bataan Death March that followed the surrender.[90] In 1962, Marcos would claim to be the "most decorated war hero of the Philippines" by garnering almost every medal and decoration that the Filipino and American governments could give to a soldier.[90] Included in his 27 war medals and decorations are that of the Distinguished Service Cross (allegedly pinned by General Douglas MacArthur) and the Medal of Honor (allegedly pinned by General Jonathan M. Wainwright). This claim has been discredited.[20] Marcos was not listed in General Douglas MacArthur's "List of Recipients of Awards and Decorations" issued from December 7, 1941 through June 30, 1945 that was compiled in Tokyo, and General Jonathan Wainwright's list of 120 Americans and Filipinos who were awarded during the Bataan campaign by the War Department shortly before his surrender.[91][92] Colonel Manriquez and Adjutant Captain Rivera who were the commanders of the 14th Infantry, whom Marcos claimed to have served under, attested that Marcos was not a soldier, but was a non-combatant and a Civil Affairs officer. Marcos did receive campaign ribbons given to all combatant and non-combatant participants "in the defense of Bataan and in the resistance."[93]

Later research showed the wartime exploits of Marcos to be mostly propaganda, being inaccurate or untrue.[94][95][96][97][98][99] In 1986, research by historian Alfred W. McCoy into United States Army records showed most of Marcos's medals to be fraudulent.[87][100] According to Ricardo José, former chairman of the Department of History of the University of the Philippines, Marcos's claims in his self-commissioned autobiography Marcos of the Philippines that Gen. Douglas MacArthur pinned on him the Distinguished Service Cross medal for delaying Japanese at Bataan for 3 months was highly improbable.[101] As with many stories about members of the Marcos family, there is some controversy about the exact nature of the death of Mariano Marcos, whom numerous schools were named after. Some versions saying he was executed by the Japanese in Bacnotan, La Union,[102][103] and others saying that he was a collaborator and was killed guerrillas related to Julio Nalundasan, the man Ferdinand Marcos had been accused of killing before the war.[104][105] John Sharkey of the Washington Post found records that Marcos was in the list of those that were released due to either "having severe health problems and those whose families have cooperated with the Japanese military authorities."[92] Since Marcos's name did not appear in the 1942 Manila Tribune list of ailing prisoners that were released by the Japanese, Sharkey believed that Marcos may have been freed due to his connections with his father.

Marcos also claimed to have led a 9,000-man guerrilla force called Ang Mahárlika (Tagalog, "The Freeman")[106] in northern Luzon during World War II. His account of events was later cast into doubt after a United States military investigation exposed many of his claims as either false or inaccurate.[107] Meanwhile, Marcos claimed that he was able to get the United States Adjutant General to recognize 3,500 individual claims of soldiers then under his command.[108]

Despite criticisms on Marcos's claims, according to the 1992 presidential inaugural biography of President Fidel Ramos who turned his back on Ferdinand Marcos during the People Power Revolution, his father Narciso Ramos served as one of the leaders of the guerrilla group Maharlika founded by President Ferdinand Marcos.[109]

Congressional career

House of Representatives

When the Philippines was granted independence on July 4, 1946 by the American government, the Philippine Congress was established. Marcos ran and was three times elected as representative of the 2nd district of Ilocos Norte, 1949–1959. He was named chairman of the House Committee on Commerce and Industry and member of the Defense Committee headed by Ramon Magsaysay. He was chairman, House Neophytes Bloc in which (President) Diosdado Macapagal, (Vice President) Emmanuel Pelaez and (Manila Mayor) Arsenio J. Lacson were members. He was also a member of the House Committee on Industry; LP spokesman on economic matters; member, Special Committee on Import and Price Controls and on Reparations; House Committees on Ways and Means, Banks Currency, War Veterans, Civil Service, Corporations and Economic Planning; and the House Electoral Tribunal.[110]

Senate

After he served as member of the House of Representatives for three terms, Marcos won his senate seat in the elections in 1959 and became the Senate minority floor leader in 1960. He became the executive vice president of the Liberal Party in and served as the party president from 1961 to 1964.

Senate Presidency

From 1963 to 1965, he became the Senate President. Thus far, he is the last Senate President to become President of the Philippines. He introduced a number of significant bills, many of which found their way into the Republic statute books.[110]

Presidency

Marcos at the White House in 1966.
Presidential styles of
Ferdinand E. Marcos
Reference styleHis Excellency
Spoken styleYour Excellency
Alternative styleMr. President

First term (1966–1969)

Economy of the Philippines under
President Ferdinand Marcos
1966–1971
Population
1967 33.71 million
Gross Domestic Product
1966Increase 285,886 million (USD73.3 billion)
1971Increase ₱361,791 million (USD56.7 billion)
Growth rate, 1966–71 average5.3%
Per capita income
1967Increase ₱8,932
1971Increase ₱9,546
Total exports
1966Increase ₱70,254 million
1971Decrease ₱63,626 million
Exchange rates
USD1 = ₱6.44
₱1 = USD0.16
Sources:[80][111]

Presidential campaign

Marcos ran a populist campaign emphasizing that he was a bemedalled war hero emerging from World War II. In 1962, Marcos would claim to be the most decorated war hero of the Philippines by garnering almost every medal and decoration that the Filipino and American governments could give to a soldier.[90] Included in his claim of 27 war medals and decorations are that of the Distinguished Service Cross and the Medal of Honor.[90][112] According to Primitivo Mijares, author of the book Conjugal dictatorship,[113] the opposition Liberal Party would later confirm that many of his war medals were only acquired in 1962 to aid in his reelection campaign for the Senate, not for his presidential campaign.[114] Marcos won the presidency in 1965.[115]

Vietnam War

To the surprise of many, soon after becoming president, Marcos wanted the Philippines to become involved, although limited, in the Vietnam War.[116] He asked Congress to approve sending a combat engineer unit to South Vietnam. When the previous Philippine president, Macapagal, suggested in 1964–1965 to send troops it had been Marcos who had led the opposition against this plan on both legal and moral grounds. Despite opposition against the new plan, the Marcos government gained Congressional approval and Philippine troops were sent from the middle of 1966 as the Philippines Civic Action Group (PHILCAG). PHILCAG reached a strength of some 1,600 troops in 1968 and between 1966 and 1970 over 10,000 Filipino soldiers served in South Vietnam, mainly being involved in civilian infrastructure projects.[117][unreliable source?]

Second term (1969–1972)

Ferdinand Marcos takes the Oath of Office for a second term before Chief Justice Roberto Concepcion on December 30, 1969

1969 Presidential Election

In 1969, Marcos was reelected for a second term—the first and the last Filipino president to win a second full term.[118][119][120][121] His running mate, incumbent Vice President Fernando Lopez was also elected to a third full term as Vice President of the Philippines.

First Quarter Storm and rumored coup d'état and plot to assassinate President Marcos

Jan. 30, 1970 – Demonstrators ramming a fire truck into Malacanang Gate 4

Around 1970, student activism was raging and many student activists joined the ranks of the communists. Kabataang Makabayan (Patriotic Youth, or 'KM') a political organization founded by Jose Maria Sison intended to be a nationwide extension of the Student Cultural Association of the University of the Philippines,[122][123] carried out study sessions on Marxism–Leninism and intensified the deployment of urban activists in rural areas to prepare for People's war.[124][125] The line between leftist activists and communists became increasingly blurred, as a significant number of KM advanced activists joined the party of the Communist Party also founded by Jose Maria Sison.[124] Earlier, during the campaign period for the 1969 elections, students called promoted a mock campaign called the Dante-for-President movement, likely referring to New People's Army founder Bernabe 'Kumander Dante' Buscayno.[126] KM members protested in front of Congress, throwing a coffin, a stuffed alligator, and stones at Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos after his State of the Nation Address. On the presidential palace, activists rammed the gate with a fire truck and once the gate broke and gave way, the activists charged into the Palace grounds tossing rocks, pillboxes, Molotov cocktails. In front of the US embassy, protesters vandalized, arsoned and damaged the embassy lobby resulting to a strong protest from the U.S. Ambassador.[124][126][127] The KM protests ranged from 50,000 to 100,000 in number per weekly mass action.[124] In the aftermath of the January 1970 riots, at least two activists were confirmed dead and several were injured by the police. The mayor of Manila at the time, Antonio Villegas, commended the Manila Police District for their "exemplary behavior and courage" and protecting the First Couple long after they have left. The death of the activists was seized by the Lopez controlled Manila Times and Manila Chronicle, blaming Marcos and added fire to the weekly protests.[128] Students declared a week-long boycott of classes and instead met to organize protest rallies.[126]

Jan. 26, 1970 – Rioters crowd Marcos and company as they enter his limousine. From Manila Bulletin.

In Marcos's diary,[127][128] he wrote that the whole crisis has been utilized by communism to create a revolutionary situation. He lamented that the powerful Lopez family, which controlled Manila Times and Manila Chronicle, blamed him for the riots thus raising the ire of demonstrators. He mentioned that he was informed by his mother of a planned assassination paid for by the powerful oligarch, Eugenio Lopez Sr (Iñing Lopez). He narrated how he dissuaded his supporters from the Northern Philippines in infiltrating the demonstration in Manila and inflicting harm on the protesters, and how he showed to the UP professors that the Collegian was carrying the communist party articles and that he was disappointed in the faculty of his alma matter for becoming a spawning ground of communism. He also added that he asked Ernesto Rufino, Vicente Rufino and Carlos Palanca to withdraw advertisements from the Manila Times which was openly supporting revolution and the communist cause, and they agreed to do so.

Rumors of coup d'état were also brewing. A report of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that shortly after the Philippine presidential election, 1969, a group composed mostly of retired colonels and generals organized a revolutionary junta with the aim of first discrediting President Marcos and then killing him. The group was headed by Eleuterio Adevoso, an official of the opposition Liberal party. As described in a document given to the committee by Philippine Government official, key figures in the plot were Vice President Fernando Lopez and Sergio Osmena Jr., whom Marcos defeated in the 1969 election.[129] Marcos even went to the U.S. embassy to dispel rumors that the U.S. embassy is supporting a coup d'état which the opposition liberal party was spreading.[128] While the report obtained by the NY Times speculated saying that story could be used by Marcos to justify Martial Law, as early as December 1969 in a message from the U.S. Ambassador to the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, the U.S. Ambassador said that most of the talk about revolution and even assassination has been coming from the defeated opposition, of which Adevoso (of the Liberal Party) is a leading activist. He also said that the information he has on the assassination plans are 'hard' or well-sourced and he has to make sure that it reached President Marcos.[130][131]

In light of the crisis, Marcos wrote an entry in his diary in January 1970:[128] "I have several options. One of them is to abort the subversive plan now by the sudden arrest of the plotters. But this would not be accepted by the people. Nor could we get the Huks (Communists), their legal cadres and support. Nor the MIM (Maoist International Movement) and other subversive [or front] organizations, nor those underground. We could allow the situation to develop naturally then after massive terrorism, wanton killings and an attempt at my assassination and a coup d'etat, then declare martial law or suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus – and arrest all including the legal cadres. Right now I am inclined towards the latter."

Martial Law and the New Society (1972–1981)

Economy of the Philippines under
President Ferdinand Marcos
1972–1981
Population
1981 49.5 million
Gross Domestic Product
1972Increase 400,850 million (USD 62.24 billion)
1981Increase ₱1,782,350 million (USD 225.61 billion)
Growth rate, 1972–81 average5.7%
Per capita income
1972Increase ₱11,000
1981Increase ₱37,500
Exchange rates
USD1 = ₱7.90
₱1 = USD0.12
Sources:[80][111][132]

At the height of armed communist insurgency in the Philippines, Philippine Military Academy instructor Lt Victor Corpuz led New People's Army rebels in a raid on the PMA armory, capturing rifles, machine guns, grenade launchers, a bazooka and thousands of rounds of ammunition in 1970.[133] In 1972, China, which was then actively supporting and arming communist insurgencies in Asia as part of Mao Zedong's People's War Doctrine, transported 1,200 M-14 and AK-47 rifles[134] for the NPA to speed up NPA's campaign to defeat the government.[135][136]

Based on interviews of The Washington Post with former Communist Party of the Philippines Officials, it was revealed that "the (Communist) party leadership planned – and three operatives carried out – the (Plaza Miranda) attack in an attempt to provoke government repression and push the country to the brink of revolution... (Communist Party Leader) Sison had calculated that Marcos could be provoked into cracking down on his opponents, thereby driving thousands of political activists into the underground, the former party officials said. Recruits were urgently needed, they said, to make use of a large influx of weapons and financial aid that China had already agreed to provide."[45]

Ferdinand Marcos with U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz, 1982.

It is easier perhaps and more comfortable to look back to the solace of a familiar and mediocre past. But the times are too grave and the stakes too high for us to permit the customary concessions to traditional democratic processes.

— Ferdinand Marcos, January 1973[137]

The pretext for Martial Law was provided later in the evening of Friday, September 22, 1972, the convoy of Secretary of Defense Juan Ponce Enrile was ambushed in Wack-Wack as he was on his way home to Dasmariñas Village in Makati before 9 p.m. Enrile recalled his convoy was driving out of Camp Aguinaldo when a car opened fire at his convoy and sped away.

A contrasting account came from Oscar Lopez, who lived along Notre Dame Street, Wack Wack Village, stated that he heard a lot of shooting and that when he went out to see what was happening, he saw an empty car riddled with bullets. Lopez’s driver, who happened to see the incident, narrated that “there was a car that came and stopped beside a Meralco post. Some people got out of the car, and then there was another car that came by beside it and started riddling it with bullets to make it look like it was ambushed.”

This ambush, as Enrile later revealed in 1986, was staged by Marcos to justify Martial Law. Excerpt from the diary of Ferdinand E. Marcos on September 22, 1972. From the Philippine Diary Project. Excerpt from the diary of Ferdinand E. Marcos on September 22, 1972. From the Philippine Diary Project.

Marcos, in his diary entry for September 22, 1972 (time-stamped 9:55 p.m.) wrote, “Sec. Juan Ponce Enrile was ambushed near Wack-Wack at about 8:00 pm tonight. It was a good thing he was riding in his security car as a protective measure… This makes the martial law proclamation a necessity.” His diary entry for September 25, 1972 mentions conditions after two days of Martial Law, also indicating martial law in reality is dated to September 23, 1972.

Primitivo Mijares—a former journalist for Marcos who would later write against Marcos and disappear without a trace in 1973—claimed that the Enrile ambush was fake as it was made as the final excuse for Marcos to declare Martial Law.[11] Mijares also claimed that the ammunition planted by the Presidential Guard Battalion in Digoyo Point, Isabela—which was later confiscated by the Philippine Constabulary on July 5, 1972—was used to connect the ambush with alleged Communist terror attacks.[138]

Marcos declared martial law on September 21, 1972 when his Press Secretary, Francisco Tatad, announced on Radio[38][39][40] that Proclamation № 1081. which Marcos had signed 2 days earlier on September 21, 1972, had come into force and would extend Marcos's rule beyond the constitutional two-term limit. He justified this by highlighting the threats of Communist and Muslim insurgencies.[139] Rigoberto Tiglao, former press secretary and a former communist incarcerated during the martial law,[140] also argued that the liberal and communist parties provoked martial law imposition.[141] Ruling by decree, he curtailed press freedom and other civil liberties, closed down Congress and media establishments, and ordered the arrest of opposition leaders and militant activists, including senators Benigno Aquino Jr., Jovito Salonga and Jose Diokno.[142][143] However, unlike Ninoy Aquino's senator colleagues who were detained without charges, Ninoy, together with communist NPA leaders Lt Corpuz and Bernabe Buscayno, was charged with murder, illegal possession of firearms and subversion.[144] Marcos claimed that martial law was the prelude to creating his Bagong Lipunan, a "New Society" based on new social and political values.

Martial Law was put on vote in July 1973 in the Philippine Martial Law referendum, 1973 and was marred with controversy[43][44] resulting to 90.77% voting yes and 9.23% voting no.

A constitutional convention, which had been called for in 1970 to replace the Commonwealth era 1935 Constitution, continued the work of framing a new constitution after the declaration of martial law. The new constitution went into effect in early 1973, changing the form of government from presidential to parliamentary and allowing Marcos to stay in power beyond 1973. The constitution was approved by 95% of the voters in the Philippine constitutional plebiscite.

After putting in force amendments to the constitution, legislative action, and securing his sweeping powers and with the Batasan, his supposed successor body to the Congress, under his control, President Marcos lifted martial law on January 17, 1981. However, the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus continued in the autonomous regions of Western Mindanao and Central Mindanao. The opposition dubbed the lifting of martial law as a mere "face lifting" as a precondition to the visit of Pope John Paul II.[145]

Marcos had a vision of a Bagong Lipunan (New Society) similar to Indonesian president Suharto's "New Order administration". He used the years of martial law to implement this vision. According to Marcos's book Notes on the New Society, it was a movement urging the poor and the privileged to work as one for the common goals of society and to achieve the liberation of the Filipino people through self-realization.

University of the Philippines economics professor and former NEDA Director-General Dr. Gerardo Sicat,[146] an MIT Ph.D. graduate, portrayed some of Martial Law's effects as follows:[147]

Economic reforms suddenly became possible under martial law. The powerful opponents of reform were silenced and the organized opposition was also quilted. In the past, it took enormous wrangling and preliminary stage-managing of political forces before a piece of economic reform legislation could even pass through Congress. Now it was possible to have the needed changes undertaken through presidential decree. Marcos wanted to deliver major changes in an economic policy that the government had tried to propose earlier. The enormous shift in the mood of the nation showed from within the government after martial law was imposed. The testimonies of officials of private chambers of commerce and of private businessmen dictated enormous support for what was happening. At least, the objectives of the development were now being achieved...[148]

During his martial law regime, Marcos confiscated and appropriated by force and duress many businesses and institutions, both private and public, and redistributed them to his cronies and close personal friends. Two of these friends were Eduardo "Danding" Cojuangco Jr., who would go on to control San Miguel Corporation, and Ramon Cojuangco, late businessman and chairman of PLDT, and father of Antonio "Tony Boy" Cojuangco (who would eventually succeed his father in the telecommunications company), both happened to be cousins of Corazon Aquino. These associates of Marcos then used these as fronts to launder proceeds from institutionalized graft and corruption in the different national governmental agencies as "crony capitalism" for personal benefit. Graft and corruption via bribery, racketeering, and embezzlement became more prevalent during this era. Marcos also silenced the free press, making the press of the state propaganda the only legal one, which was a common practice for governments around the world that sought to fight communism.

By 1977, the armed forces had quadrupled and over 60,000 Filipinos had been arrested for political reasons. In 1981, Vice President George H. W. Bush praised Marcos for his "adherence to democratic principles and to the democratic processes".[a] No American military or politician in the 1970s ever publicly questioned the authority of Marcos to help fight communism in South East Asia.

Marcos and his close Rolex 12 associates like Juan Ponce Enrile used their powers to settle scores against old rivals such as the Lopezes who were always opposed to the Marcos administration. Enrile and the Lopezes (Eugenio Lopez, Sr. and Eugenio Lopez Jr.) were Harvard-educated Filipino leaders. Leading opponents such as Senators Benigno Aquino Jr., Jose Diokno, Jovito Salonga and many others were imprisoned for months or years. This practice considerably alienated the support of the old social and economic elite and the media, who criticized the Marcos administration endlessly.[153] The old social and economic elite, all of whom relied on trade and agricultural and industrial exports to the United States such as the families of Enrile, Lopez, Cojuangco, and Aquino, sought a free-market economy. At this point, Marcos controlled both the oligarchy and the oligopoly.

Between 1972 and 1976, Marcos increased the size of the Philippine military from 65,000 to 270,000 personnel, in response to the fall of South Vietnam to the communists and the growing tide of communism in South East Asia. Military officers were placed on the boards of a variety of media corporations, public utilities, development projects, and other private corporations, most of whom were highly educated and well-trained graduates of the Philippine Military Academy. At the same time, Marcos made efforts to foster the growth of a domestic weapons manufacturing industry and heavily increased military spending.[154]

From the declaration of martial law in 1972 until 1983 the U.S. government provided $2.5 billion in bilateral military and economic aid to the Marcos regime, and about $5.5 billion through multilateral institutions such as the World Bank.[155]

In a 1979 U.S. Senate report it was stated that U.S. officials were aware, as early as 1973, that Philippine government agents were in the United States to harass Filipino dissidents. In June 1981, two anti-Marcos labor activists were assassinated outside of a union hall in Seattle. On at least one occasion, CIA agents blocked FBI investigations of Philippine agents.[156]

Many human rights abuses were attributed to the Philippine Constabulary which was then headed by future president Fidel Ramos. The Civilian Home Defense Force, a precursor of Civilian Armed Forces Geographical Unit (CAFGU), was organized by President Marcos to battle with the communist and Islamic insurgency problem, has particularly been accused of notoriously inflicting human right violations on leftists, the NPA, Muslim insurgents, and rebels against the Marcos government.[157] However, under martial law the Marcos administration was able to reduce violent urban crime, collect unregistered firearms, and suppress communist insurgency in some areas.[158]

The Marcos regime instituted a mandatory youth organization, known as the Kabataang Barangay, which was led by Marcos's eldest daughter Imee. Presidential Decree 684, enacted in April 1975, required that all youths aged 15 to 18 be sent to remote rural camps and do volunteer work.[159][160]

Along with Marcos, members of his Rolex 12 circle like Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile, Chief of Staff of the Philippine Constabulary Fidel Ramos, and Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines Fabian Ver were the chief administrators of martial law from 1972 to 1981, and the three remained President Marcos's closest advisers until he was ousted in 1986. Other peripheral members of the Rolex 12 included Eduardo "Danding" Cojuangco Jr. and Lucio Tan.

Normalization of ties with Communist China and effort to isolate local communist rebels

Marcos recognized the need to established a peaceful relationship with China. In his 1969 State of the Nation Address, he said:[161]

We, in Asia must strive toward a modus vivendi with Red China. I reiterate this need, which is becoming more urgent each day. Before long, Communist China will have increased its striking power a thousand fold with a sophisticated delivery system for its nuclear weapons. We must prepare for that day. We must prepare to coexist peaceably with Communist China.

— Ferdinand Marcos, January 1969

Prior to 1975, the Philippine government maintained a close relationship with the Kuomintang-ruled Chinese government which fled to Taiwan (Republic of China), despite the Chinese Communist Victory in 1949, and saw Communist China (People's Republic of China) as a security threat due to China's financial and military support of Communist rebels in the country.[162]

In June 1975, President Marcos went to the People's Republic of China and signed a Joint Communiqué normalizing relations between the Philippines and China. Among other things, the Communiqué recognizes that "there is but one China and that Taiwan is an integral part of Chinese territory…" In turn, Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai also pledged that China would not intervene in the internal affairs of the Philippines nor will it seek to impose its policies in Asia, a move which isolated the local communist movement that China had financially and militarily supported.[163][164]

The Washington Post in an interview with former Philippine Communist Party Officials, revealed that, "they (local communist party officials) wound up languishing in China for 10 years as unwilling "guests" of the (Chinese) government, feuding bitterly among themselves and with the party leadership in the Philippines".[45]

The government subsequently captured NPA leaders Bernabe Buscayno in 1976 and Jose Maria Sison in 1977.[164]

First parliamentary elections after martial law declaration

The Philippine parliamentary election, 1978 was held on April 7, 1978 for the election of the 166 (of the 208) regional representatives to the Interim Batasang Pambansa (the nation's first parliament). The elections were participated by several parties including Ninoy Aquino's newly formed party, the Lakas ng Bayan (LABAN) and the regime's party known as the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL).

The Ninoy Aquino's LABAN party fielded 21 candidates for the Metro Manila area including Ninoy himself and Alex Boncayao, who later was associated with Filipino communist death squad Alex Boncayao Brigade[165][166] that killed U.S. army captain James N. Rowe. All of the party's candidates, including Ninoy, lost in the election.

Marcos's KBL party won 137 seats, while Pusyon Bisaya led by Hilario Davide Jr., who later became the Minority Floor Leader, won 13 seats.

These elections however were LUTONG MACOY as explained in http://www.academia.edu/7968626/LUTONG_MACOY_Philippine_Elections_under_the_Marcos_Regime_Comparisons_and_Lessons_for_Today. This was manipulated by the martial law government to achieve results favorable to the martial law regime.

Prime Minister

In 1978, the position returned when Ferdinand Marcos became Prime Minister. Based on Article 9 of the 1973 constitution, it had broad executive powers that would be typical of modern prime ministers in other countries. The position was the official head of government, and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. All of the previous powers of the President from the 1935 Constitution were transferred to the newly restored office of Prime Minister. The Prime Minister also acted as head of the National Economic Development Authority. Upon his re-election to the Presidency in 1981, Marcos was succeeded as Prime Minister by an American-educated leader and Wharton graduate, Cesar Virata, who was elected as an Assemblyman (Member of the Parliament) from Cavite in 1978. He is the eponym of the Cesar Virata School of Business, the business school of the University of the Philippines Diliman.

Cabinet under martial law

Cabinet

Third term (1981–1986)

Economy of the Philippines under
President Ferdinand Marcos
1982–1985
Population
1985 54.67 million
Gross Domestic Product
1982Decrease 1,857 billion (USD 217.45 billion)
1985Decrease ₱1,537 million (USD 82.59 billion)
Growth rate, 1982–85 average-2.3%
Per capita income
1982Decrease ₱37,000
1985Decrease ₱26,000
Exchange rates
USD1 = ₱18.61
₱1 = USD0.05
Sources:[80][111][132]
President Ferdinand E. Marcos in Washington in 1983.

We love your adherence to democratic principles and to the democratic process, and we will not leave you in isolation.

— U.S. Vice President George H. W. Bush during Ferdinand E. Marcos inauguration, June 1981[169][a]

On June 16, 1981, six months after the lifting of martial law, the first presidential election in twelve years was held. President Marcos ran and won a massive victory over the other candidates.[170] The major opposition parties, the United Nationalists Democratic Organizations (UNIDO), a coalition of opposition parties and LABAN, boycotted the elections.The opposition parties boycotted the election because all of the martial law decrees were still in place and the opposition was not allowed to campaign. They felt that their participation would legitimize the regime.[171]

After the lifting of Martial Law, the pressure on the Communist CPP-NPA alleviated. The group able to return to urban areas and form relationships with legal opposition organizations, and became increasingly successful attacks against the government throughout the country.[164] The violence inflicted by the communists reached its peak in 1985 with 1,282 military and police deaths and 1,362 civilian deaths.[164]

Aquino's assassination

On August 21, 1983, opposition leader Benigno Aquino Jr. was assassinated on the tarmac at Manila International Airport. He had returned to the Philippines after three years in exile in the United States, where he had a heart bypass operation to save his life after Marcos allowed him to leave the Philippines to seek medical care. Prior to his heart surgery, Ninoy, along with his two co-accused, NPA leaders Bernabe Buscayno (Commander Dante) and Lt. Victor Corpuz, was sentenced to death by a military commission on charges of murder, illegal possession of firearms and subversion.[144] A few months before his assassination, Ninoy was decided to go back to the Philippines after his research fellowship from Harvard University had expired. The opposition blamed Marcos directly for the assassination while others blamed the military and his wife, Imelda. Popular speculations pointed to three suspects; first was Marcos himself through his trusted military chief Fabian Ver; the second theory pointed to his wife Imelda who had her own burning ambition now that her ailing husband seemed to be getting weaker, and the third was that Danding Cojuangco planned the assassination because of his own political ambitions.[172] The 1985 acquittals of Chief of Staff General Fabian Ver as well as other high-ranking military officers charged with the crime were widely seen as a whitewash and miscarriage of justice.

On November 22, 2007, Pablo Martinez, one of the convicted suspects in the assassination of Ninoy Aquino Jr. alleges that it was Ninoy Aquino Jr.'s relative, Danding Cojuangco, cousin of his wife Corazon Cojuangco Aquino, who ordered the assassination of Ninoy Aquino Jr. while Marcos was recuperating from his kidney transplant. Martinez also alleges only he and Galman knew of the assassination, and that Galman was the actual shooter, which is not collaborated by other evidence of the case.[173]

Impeachment attempt

In August 1985, 56 Assemblymen signed a resolution calling for the impeachment of President Marcos for alleged diversion of U.S. aid for personal use,[174] citing a July 1985 San Jose Mercury News exposé of the Marcos's multimillion-dollar investment and property holdings in the United States.

The properties allegedly amassed by the First Family were the Crown Building, Lindenmere Estate, and a number of residential apartments (in New Jersey and New York), a shopping center in New York, mansions (in London, Rome and Honolulu), the Helen Knudsen Estate in Hawaii and three condominiums in San Francisco, California.

The Assemblymen also included in the complaint the misuse and misapplication of funds "for the construction of the Manila Film Center, where X-rated and pornographic films[citation needed] are exhibited, contrary to public morals and Filipino customs and traditions." The impeachment attempt gained little real traction, however, even in the light of this incendiary charge; the committee to which the impeachment resolution was referred did not recommend it, and any momentum for removing Marcos under constitutional processes soon died.[citation needed]

Physical decline

During his third term, Marcos's health deteriorated rapidly due to kidney ailments, as a complication of a chronic autoimmune disease lupus erythematosus. He had a kidney transplant in August 1983, and when his body rejected the first kidney transplant, he had a second transplant in November 1984.[175] Marcos's regime was sensitive to publicity of his condition; a palace physician who alleged that during one of these periods Marcos had undergone a kidney transplant was shortly afterwards found murdered. Police said he was kidnapped and slain by communist rebels.[175] Many people questioned whether he still had capacity to govern, due to his grave illness and the ballooning political unrest.[176] With Marcos ailing, his powerful wife, Imelda, emerged as the government's main public figure. Marcos dismissed speculations of his ailing health as he used to be an avid golfer and fitness buff who liked showing off his physique.

By 1984, U.S. President Ronald Reagan started distancing himself from the Marcos regime that he and previous American presidents had strongly supported even after Marcos declared martial law. The United States, which had provided hundreds of millions of dollars in aid, was crucial in buttressing Marcos's rule over the years,[177] although during the Carter administration the relationship with the U.S. had soured somewhat when President Jimmy Carter targeted the Philippines in his human rights campaign.

Snap election, revolution, and exile

In late 1985, in the face of escalating public discontent and under pressure from foreign allies, Marcos called a "snap election" with more than a year left in his term. He selected Arturo Tolentino as his running mate. The opposition to Marcos united behind two American-educated leaders, Aquino's widow, Corazon, and her running mate, Salvador Laurel.[178][179]

It was during this time that Marcos's World War II medals for fighting the Japanese Occupation was first questioned by the foreign press. During a campaign in Manila's Tondo district, Marcos retorted:[180]

You who are here in Tondo and fought under me and who were part of my guerrilla organization—you answer them, these crazy individuals, especially the foreign press. Our opponents say Marcos was not a real guerrilla. Look at them. These people who were collaborating with the enemy when we were fighting the enemy. Now they have the nerve to question my war record. I will not pay any attention to their accusation.

— Ferdinand Marcos, January 1986

Marcos was referring to both Presidential candidate Corazon Aquino's father-in-law Benigno Aquino Sr. and Vice Presidential Candidate Salvador Laurel's father, José P. Laurel, who were leaders of the KALIBAPI, a puppet political party that collaborated with the Japanese during the Japanese occupation of the Philippines. Both were arrested and charged for treason after the war.[181]

The elections were held on February 7, 1986.[182] The official election canvasser, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), declared Marcos the winner. The final tally of the COMELEC had Marcos winning with 10,807,197 votes against Aquino's 9,291,761 votes. On the other hand, the partial 69% tally of the National Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL), an accredited poll watcher, had Aquino winning with 7,502,601 votes against Marcos's 6,787,556 votes. Cheating was reported on both sides.[183] This electoral exercise was marred by widespread reports of violence and tampering of election results.

Despite common knowledge that Marcos cheated the elections, some claim that Marcos is the one that had been cheated by NAMFREL because his Solid North votes were transmitted very late to the tabulation center at the PICC. Two Namfrel volunteers were hanged in Ilocos. The Ilocano votes were enough to overwhelm Cory's lead in Metro Manila and other places.[184]

The alleged fraud culminated in the walkout of 35 COMELEC computer technicians to protest the manipulation of the official election results to favor Ferdinand Marcos. However, not known to many, the walkout of computer technicians was led by Linda Kapunan,[185] wife of Lt Col Eduardo Kapunan, a leader of Reform the Armed Forces Movement, which plotted to attack the Malacañang Palace and kill Marcos and his family,[186] leading some to believe that the walkout could have been plotted with ulterior motives.[184]

The failed election process gave a decisive boost to the "People Power movement." Enrile and Ramos would later abandon Marcos's 'sinking ship' and seek protection behind the 1986 People Power Revolution, backed by fellow-American educated Eugenio Lopez Jr., Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala, and the old political and economic elites. At the height of the revolution, Juan Ponce Enrile revealed that a purported and well-publicized ambush attempt against him years earlier was in fact faked, in order for Marcos to have a pretext for imposing martial law. However, Marcos never ceased to maintain that he was the duly elected and proclaimed president of the Philippines for a fourth term, but unfairly and illegally deprived of his right to serve it. On February 25, 1986, rival presidential inaugurations were held,[187] but as Aquino supporters overran parts of Manila and seized state broadcaster PTV-4, Marcos was forced to flee.[188]

At 15:00 PST (GMT+8) on February 25, 1986, Marcos talked to United States Senator and close associate of the US President Paul Laxalt, asking for advice from the White House. Laxalt advised him to "cut and cut cleanly", to which Marcos expressed his disappointment after a short pause.[189] In the afternoon, Marcos talked to Enrile, asking for safe passage for him and his family including his close allies like General Ver. Finally, at 9:00 p.m., the Marcos family was transported by four Sikorsky HH-3E helicopters[190] to Clark Air Base in Angeles City, Pampanga, about 83 kilometers north of Manila, before boarding US Air Force C-130 planes bound for Andersen Air Force Base in Guam, and finally to Hickam Air Force Base in Hawaii where Marcos arrived on February 26.

When protestors stormed Malacañang Palace shortly after Marcos's departure, it was famously discovered that Imelda had left behind over 2,700 pairs of shoes in her closet.[191]

The Catholic hierarchy and Manila's middle class were crucial to the success of the massive crusade, but only within Metro Manila because no mass demonstrations or protests against Marcos happened in the provinces and islands of Visayas and Mindanao.

Economy

Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos on a walk with U.S. President Ronald Reagan.

To help finance a number of economic development projects, the Marcos government borrowed large amounts of money from international lenders.[192][193] The External debt of the Philippines rose more than 70-fold from $360 million in 1962 to $26.2 billion in 1985,[194] making the Philippines one of the most indebted countries in Asia.[192] Philippine Annual Gross Domestic Product grew from $5.27 billion in 1964 to $37.14 billion in 1982, a year prior to the assassination of Ninoy Aquino. The GDP went down to $30.7 billion in 1985, after two years of economic recession brought about by political instability following Ninoy's assassination.[195] A sizable amount of this money went to the Marcos family and friends in the form of behest loans[citation needed].

As a former colony of the United States, the Philippines was heavily reliant on the American economy to purchase agricultural goods such as sugar,[196] tobacco, coconut, bananas, and pineapple[197][198] and US corporations prospered.

Economy during martial law (1973–1980)

According to World Bank Data, the Philippine's Annual Gross Domestic Product quadrupled from $8 billion in 1972 to $32.45 billion in 1980, while debt stood at US$17.2 billion by the end of 1980.[195][199] Indeed, according to the U.S. based Heritage Foundation, the Philippines enjoyed its best economic development since 1945 between 1972 and 1979.[200] The economy grew amidsts two severe global oil shocks following the 1973 oil crisis and 1979 energy crisis – oil price was $3 / barrel in 1973 and $39.5 in 1979, or a growth of 1200%. By the end of 1979, debt was still manageable, with debt to Debt-GNP ratio about the same as South Korea, according to th US National Bureau of Economic Research.[201]

Foreign capital was invited to invest in certain industrial projects. They were offered incentives, including tax exemption privileges and the privilege of bringing out their profits in foreign currencies. One of the most important economic programs in the 1980s was the Kilusang Kabuhayan at Kaunlaran (Movement for Livelihood and Progress). This program was started in September 1981. It aimed to promote the economic development of the barangays by encouraging its residents to engage in their own livelihood projects. The government's efforts resulted in the increase of the nation's economic growth rate to an average of six percent or seven percent from 1970 to 1980.[202]

Economy after martial law (1981–1985)

Marcos at the North–South Summit on International Cooperation and Development in Cancun alongside other world leaders including I. Gandhi, F. Mitterrand, R. Reagan, M. Thatcher, K. Waldheim, Zhao Ziyang; October 23, 1981.

The Philippine economy, heavily reliant on exports to the United States, suffered a great decline after the Aquino assassination in August 1983 because Filipino business and political leaders who studied in Harvard, Yale, and other US universities began lobbying American and foreign firms to discourage them from investing in the Philippines. This was taking place at the same time that China was beginning to accept free-market capitalism and American businesses were jockeying to establish manufacturing plants in China. The political troubles of the Philippines hindered the entry of foreign investments, and foreign banks stopped granting loans to the Philippine government. In an attempt to launch a national economic recovery program and despite his growing isolation from American businesses, Marcos negotiated with foreign creditors including the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), for a restructuring of the country's foreign debts – to give the Philippines more time to pay the loans. Marcos ordered a cut in government expenditures and used a portion of the savings to finance the Sariling Sikap (Self-Reliance), a livelihood program he established in 1984.

However, the economy continued to shrink despite the government's recovery efforts because American investors were discouraged by the Filipino economic elite. The failure of the recovery program was caused by civil unrest, rampant graft and corruption within the government, and Marcos's lack of credibility. The unemployment rate increased from 6.25% in 1972 to 11.058% in 1985.[203]

Considering the severe 1984–1985 recession, the Philippine economy annual growth rate from 1972 to 1985 of 3.4% is significantly lower than the 5.4% growth rate achieved by other countries in ASEAN (Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore) in the same time period.[204]

Creation of a credit bureau

In 1981, Ferdinand Marcos issued Letter of Instructions No. 1107 mandating the Central Bank of the Philippines to analyze the probability of establishing and funding the operation of a credit bureau in the Philippines due to the disturbing increase of failures on corporate borrowers.[205] In adherence to the order, Central Bank of the Philippines organized the Credit Information Exchange System under the department of Loans and Credit. It was created to engage in collating, developing and analyzing credit information on individuals, institutions, business entities and other business concerns. It aims to develop and undertake the continuing exchange of credit data within its members and subscribers and to provide an impartial source of credit information for debtors, creditors and the public. On April 14, 1982, Credit Information Bureau, Inc. was incorporated as a non-stock, non-profit corporation. CIBI was created pursuant to LOI No. 1107 dated February 16, 1981 and was further strengthened by PD No. 1941 which recognizes and supports CIBI as a suitable credit bureau to promote the development and maintenance of rational and efficient credit processes in the financial system and in the economy as a whole. In 1997, Credit Information Bureau, Inc. was incorporated and transformed into a private entity and became CIBI Information, Inc. CIBI is a provider of information and intelligence for business, credit and individuals.[206] The company also supplies compliance reports before accrediting suppliers, industry partners and even hiring professionals.[207]

Controversies

According to the book The Making of the Philippines by Frank Senauth (p. 103):[208] "Marcos himself diverted large sums of government money to his party's campaign funds. Between 1972 and 1980, the average monthly income of wage workers had fallen by 20%. By 1981, the wealthiest 10% of the population was receiving twice as much income as the bottom 60%.[209] From 1972 to 1980, agricultural production fell by 30%. With help from the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, Marcos brought the Green Revolution (industrialized, chemical agriculture) to the Philippines. These reforms resulted in high profits for transnational corporations, but were generally harmful to small, peasant farmers who were often pushed into poverty.[210] After declaring martial law in 1972, Marcos promised to implement agrarian reforms. However, the land reforms served largely to undermine Marcos's landholder opponents, not to lessen inequality in the countryside,[211] and encouraged conversion to cash tenancy and greater reliance on farm workers.[212] Under Marcos, timber products were among the nation's top exports but little attention was paid to the environmental impacts of deforestation as cronies never complied with reforestation agreements. By the early 1980s, forestry collapsed because most of the Philippines' accessible forests had been depleted—of the 12 million hectares of forestland, about 7 million had been left barren."[213][214]

While the book claimed that agricultural production declined by 30% in the 1970s and suggested that timber exports were growing in the same period, an article published by the World Bank on Philippine Agriculture says that crops (rice, corn, coconut, sugar), livestock and poultry and fisheries grew at an average rate of 6.8%, 3% and 4.5%, respectively from 1970 to 1980, and the forestry sector actually declined by an annual average rate of 4.4% through the 1970s.[215]

During the Green Revolution, Marcos administration took advantage of a new rice cultivar IR8 developed by Philippine-based International Rice Research Institute. While the switch to IR8 required more fertilizers and pesticides, annual rice production in the Philippines increased from 3.7 to 7.7 million tons in two decades and made the Philippines a rice exporter for the first time in the 20th century.[216][217]

Despite claims made by the book that land reforms served largely to undermine Marcos's landholder opponents, Marcos's government did not distribute to small farmers his political rival Ninoy Aquino's family's 6,453 hectare Hacienda Luisita plantation, the biggest in the country.[218][219]

The country's total external debt rose from US$2.3 billion in 1970 to US$26.2 billion in 1985 during Marcos's term. Marcos's critics charged that policies have become debt-driven with rampant corruption and plunder of public funds by Marcos and his cronies. This held the country under a debt-servicing crisis which is expected to be fixed by only 2025. Critics have pointed out an elusive state of the country's development as the period is marred by a sharp devaluing of the Philippine Peso from 3.9 to 20.53. The overall economy experienced a slower growth GDP per capita, lower wage conditions and higher unemployment especially towards the end of Marcos's term after the 1983–1984 recession. Some of Marcos's critics claimed that poverty incidence grew from 41% in the 1960s at the time Marcos took the Presidency to 59% when he was removed from power,[29][220][221][222][223][224]

Death

In his dying days, Marcos was visited by Vice President Salvador Laurel.[225] During the meeting with Salvador Laurel, Marcos offered 90% of his possessions back to the Filipino people in exchange for being buried back in the Philippines beside his mother, an offer also disclosed to Enrique Zobel. However, Marcos's offer was rebuffed by the Aquino government.[226][227][228]

Marcos died in Honolulu on the morning of September 28, 1989, of kidney, heart, and lung ailments. Marcos was interred in a private mausoleum at Byodo-In Temple on the island of Oahu where his remains were visited daily by the Marcos family, political allies and friends.

The Aquino government refused to allow Marcos's body to be brought back to the Philippines. The body was only brought back to the Philippines 4 years after Marcos's death during the term of President Fidel Ramos.[229]

From 1993 to 2016, his remains were interred inside a refrigerated crypt in Ilocos Norte, where his son, Ferdinand Jr., and eldest daughter, Imee have since become the local governor and congressional representative, respectively. A large bust of Ferdinand Marcos (inspired by Mount Rushmore) was commissioned by the tourism minister, Jose Aspiras, and carved into a hillside in Benguet. It was subsequently destroyed; suspects included left-wing activists, members of a local tribe who had been displaced by construction of the monument, and looters hunting for the legendary Yamashita treasure.[230]

Opinion on his burial remains split: 50 percent of the 1,800 respondents of a survey conducted by SWS in February 2016 said Marcos "was worthy to be buried at the Libingan ng Mga Bayani" while the other half rejected a hero's burial .[231]

On November 18, 2016, the remains of Marcos was buried at the Heroes' Cemetery despite opposition from various groups. The burial came as unexpected to many, as the Supreme Court's ruling still allowed 15 days for the opposition to file a motion for reconsideration. On the morning of November 18, using Philippine Armed Forces choppers, his family and their supporters flew his remains from Ilocos to Manila for a private burial.

Students of the Ateneo de Manila University along Katipunan Avenue protesting against the burial of Marcos insisting that the former President is not a hero and a dictator.

Various protest groups formed immediately upon news of the burial. Among those who gathered to opposed the burial was a group of youth. The League of Filipino Students described the transfer of Marcos remains for the eventually successful burial the former president as being done like "a thief in the night." They also criticized the government's involvement in the burial of the former president which they describe as a "fascist dictator". The Kabataan Partylist condemn the burial labeling it as a "grave travesty" and as "galawang Hokage" (lit.'Hokage move; Hokage is a high-ranked ninja in the Naruto anime franchise)'.[232]

Recognition

National

Foreign

Infrastructure projects and works

North Luzon Expressway, one of Marcos's infrastructure projects

Marcos's government built a large number of infrastructure projects, including hospitals[247] like the Philippine Heart Center, Lung Center, and Kidney Center, transportation infrastructure like San Juanico Bridge, Pan-Philippine Highway, North Luzon Expressway, South Luzon Expressway,[248] and Manila Light Rail Transit (LRT), and 17 hydroelectric[249][250] and geothermal power plants[251][252] to lessen the country's dependency on oil.[253] By 1983, the Philippines became the second largest producer of geothermal power in the world with the commissioning of the Tongonan 1 and Palinpinon 1 geothermal plants.[251][254] According to UP Economics Professor Dr. Sicat, "a study of infrastructure construction by various presidents shows that Marcos was the president who made the largest infrastructure investment. This is not because he was the longest-serving leader of the country alone. On a per-year basis, he led all the presidents. Only Fidel Ramos had bested him in road building for a period of one year".[255] On the education front, 47[256] state colleges and universities were built during the Marcos administration, which represents over 40% of all the existing 112 state colleges and universities[257][258] in the country. To help transform the country's agricultural-based economy to a Newly industrialized country,[259] he spearheaded the development of 11 heavy industrialization projects[260] including steel, petrochemical,[261] cement, pulp and paper mill, and copper smelter.[262] Cultural and heritage sites like the Cultural Center of the Philippines, Nayong Pilipino, and Philippine International Convention Center were built.

Likewise, the country crafted a large number of decrees, laws, and edicts during Marcos's term.[263] From 1972 to 1986, the Marcos Administration codified laws through 2,036 Presidential Decrees,[264] an average of 145 per year during the 14-year period. To put this into context, only 14, 12, and 11 laws were passed in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.[265] Almost all of the laws passed during the term of Marcos are remain in force today and are embedded in the country's legal system.[263]

Marcos, together with agriculture minister and Harvard-educated Arturo Tanco[266] and later on Salvador Escudero Jr., was instrumental in the Green Revolution in the Philippines and initiated an agricultural program called Masagana 99, improving agricultural productivity and enabling the country to achieve rice sufficiency in the late 1970s.[267][268]

Authored works

  • National discipline: the key to our future (1970)[269]
  • Today's Revolution: Democracy (1971)[269]
  • Notes on the New Society of the Philippines (1973)[269]
  • Tadhana: the history of the Filipino People (1977, 1982)[269]
  • The democratic revolution in the Philippines (1977)[269]
  • Five years of the new society (1978)[269]
  • President Ferdinand E. Marcos on law, development and human rights (1978)[269]
  • President Ferdinand E. Marcos on agrarian reform (1979)[269]
  • An Ideology for Filipinos (1980)
  • An introduction to the politics of transition (1980)[269]
  • Marcos's Notes for the Cancun Summit, 1981 (1981)[269]
  • Progress and Martial Law (1981)
  • The New Philippine Republic: A Third World Approach to Democracy (1982)[269]
  • Toward a New Partnership: The Filipino Ideology (1983)[269]
  • A Trilogy on the Transformation of Philippine Society (1988)

Ill-gotten wealth, Yamashita's treasure question and status of corruption cases

The Philippine Supreme Court considers all Marcos assets beyond their legally declared earnings/salary to be ill-gotten wealth[270] and such wealth have been forfeited in favor of the government or human rights victims.[271] However, except for a former Marcos aide who conspired to sell a Monet and other artworks sequestered by the Philippine government,[272][273] no one accused of taking what the Philippine government calls "ill-gotten" assets has been convicted for plundering the Philippine treasury, receiving bribes, or corruption.[274] In 1990, Imelda Marcos, the widow of the former Philippine President, was acquitted of charges by a U.S. Jury that she raided the country's treasury and invested the money in the United States.[275] In 1993, she was convicted of graft in Manila for entering into three unfavorable lease contracts between a Government-run transportation agency and another government-run hospital.[276] In 1998, the Philippine Supreme Court overturned the previous conviction of Imelda Marcos and acquitted her of corruption charges.[277] In 2008, Philippine trial court judge Silvino Pampilo acquitted Imelda Marcos, then widow of Ferdinand Marcos, of 32 counts of illegal money transfer[278] from the 1993 graft conviction.[279] In 2010, she was ordered to repay the Philippine government almost $280,000 for funds taken by Ferdinand Marcos in 1983.[280] In 2012, a US Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit upheld a contempt judgement against Imelda and her son Bongbong Marcos for violating an injunction barring them from dissipating their assets, and awarded $353.6 million to human rights victims.[281] As of October 2015, she still faces 10 criminal charges of graft, along with 25 civil cases,[274][282] down from 900 cases in the 1990s, as most of the cases were dismissed for lack of evidence.[68]

Enrique Zobel, founder of Makati Business Club and former chairman and president of Ayala Corporation, in his sworn statement, estimated Marcos gold hoard valued at US$100 billion and that Marcos wealth and that the riches were part of the Yamashita's treasure.[71] Moreover, Marcelino Tagle, ex-director of Caritas Manila and Ten Outstanding Young Man awardee in 1967,[283] corroborated Zobel and said that Marcos's gold was not stolen from the Philippine government, but came from Yamashita gold hoard and Vatican gold captured by Hitler.[72][unreliable source?]

On May 9, 2016, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists released the searchable database from Panama Papers.[284] His two daughters, Imee Marcos Manotoc and Irene Marcos Araneta,[285][286] have been named, along with his grandsons Fernando Manotoc, Matthew Joseph Manotoc, Ferdinand Richard Manotoc, his son-in-law Gregorio Maria Araneta III,[287] including his estranged son-in-law Tommy Manotoc's relatives Ricardo Gabriel Manotoc, Teodoro Kalaw Manotoc, Maria Eva Estrada Kalaw.[288] According to The Guardian, Ferdinand Marcos had an accumulated stolen wealth of US $10 billion during his presidency from 1965 to 1986, while earning an annual salary equivalent to US $13,500.00.[289]

Reparations

In 1995, some 10,000 Filipinos won a U.S. class-action lawsuit filed against the Marcos estate. The claims were filed by victims or their surviving relatives consequent on torture, execution, and disappearances.[290][291]

The Swiss government, initially reluctant to respond to allegations that stolen funds were held in Swiss accounts,[292] has returned $684 million of Marcos's stash.[293][294][295][296]

Corazon Aquino repealed many of the repressive laws that had been enacted during Marcos's dictatorship. She restored the right of access to habeas corpus, repealed anti-labor laws and freed hundreds of political prisoners.[297]

From 1989 to 1996, a series of suits were brought before U.S. courts against Marcos and his daughter Imee, alleging that they bore responsibility for executions, torture, and disappearances. A jury in the Ninth Circuit Court awarded USD2 billion to the plaintiffs and to a class composed of human rights victims and their families.[298] On June 12, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court (in a 7–2 ruling penned by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Republic of the Philippines v. Mariano Pimentel) held that: "The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions to order the District Court to dismiss the interpleader action." The court dismissed the interpleader lawsuit filed to determine the rights of 9,500 Filipino human rights victims (1972–1986) to recover USD35 million, part of a USD2 billion judgment in U.S. courts against the Marcos estate, because the Philippines government is an indispensable party, protected by sovereign immunity. The Philippines government claimed ownership of the funds transferred by Marcos in 1972 to Arelma S.A., which invested the money with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., in New York.[299][300][301]

Human rights groups place the number of victims of extrajudicial killings under martial law at 1,500 and Karapatan, a local human rights group's records show 759 involuntarily disappeared with their bodies never found. Military historian Alfred McCoy in his book Closer than Brothers: Manhood at the Philippine Military Academy and in his speech "Dark Legacy" cites 3,257 extrajudicial killings, 35,000 torture victims, and 70,000 incarcerated during the Marcos years.[16][48] The newspaper Bulatlat (lit. "to open carelessly") places the number of victims of arbitrary arrest and detention at 120,000.[302]

Legacy

File:Bust of Ferdinand Marcos, near the town of Baguio.jpg
Bust of Ferdinand Marcos before it was destroyed in 2002.

Many laws written by Marcos are still in force and in effect. Out of thousands of proclamations, decrees, and executive orders, only a few were repealed, revoked, modified or amended.[303]

I often wonder what I will be remembered in history for. Scholar? Military hero? Builder? The new constitution? Reorganization of government? Builder of roads, schools? The green revolution? Uniter of variant and antagonistic elements of our people? He brought light to a dark country? Strong rallying point, or a weak tyrant?

— Ferdinand Marcos[304]

Massive foreign loans also enabled Marcos to build more schools, hospitals and infrastructure than all of his predecessors combined,[6] but at great cost. Today, according to Ibon Foundation, a left-learning think tank that advocated the government to default on its debt, Filipino citizens are still bearing the heavy burden of servicing public debts incurred during Marcos's administration, with ongoing interest payments on the loan schedule by the Philippine government estimated to last until 2025–59 years after Marcos assumed office and 39 years after he was kicked out.[305] However, a listing of debt from the Philippine Bureau of Treasury as of August 2016 revealed that the oldest outstanding government debt in form of treasury bonds is dated 20-Dec-93[306] and no outstanding Philippine dollar debt were dated earlier than 2000.[307]

Corazon Aquino had an opportunity to default and not pay foreign debt incurred during the Marcos administration. However, due to Finance Secretary Jaime Ongpin's warning[308] on the consequences of a debt default, which includes isolating the country from the international financial community and hampering the economic recovery, Corazon Aquino honored all the debts incurred during the Marcos Administration,[309] contrary to expectations of left-learning organizations like Ibon foundation which advocated for non-payment of debt.[310] Jaime Ongpin, who is a brother of Marcos trade minister Roberto Ongpin, was later dismissed by Cory Aquino and later died in an apparent suicide after "he had been depressed about infighting in Aquino's cabinet and disappointed that the 'People Power' uprising which had toppled dictator Ferdinand Marcos had not brought significant change".[311]

Some of these loans were funded to construct the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant but, after Marcos's ouster, the plant was not utilized by the succeeding Aquino Administration even though the same technology was used in Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Corazon Aquino's decision to mothball the Bataan Nuclear Plant built during the Marcos administration contributed to the power crisis in the 1990s, as the 620 megawatts capacity of the plant would be enough to cover the shortfall at that time.[312]

In the 2004 Global Transparency Report, Marcos appeared in the list of the World's Most Corrupt Leaders, listed in second place behind Suharto, the former President of Indonesia.[11][313]

The amount of theft perpetrated by Marcos's regime was probably less than that by Suharto on Indonesia, but harmed our country more because the sums stolen by Marcos were sent out of the country, whereas Suharto's loot mostly were invested in Indonesia.

— Former Senator Vicente Paterno[314]

According to Jovito Salonga, monopolies in several vital industries were created and placed under the control of Marcos cronies, such as the coconut industries (under Eduardo Cojuangco Jr. and Juan Ponce Enrile), the tobacco industry (under Lucio Tan), the banana industry (under Antonio Floirendo), the sugar industry (under Roberto Benedicto), and manufacturing (under Herminio Disini and Ricardo Silverio). The Marcos and Romualdez families became owners, directly or indirectly, of the nation's largest corporations, such as the Philippine Long Distance Company (PLDC), of which the present name is Philippine Long Distance Telephone (PLDT), Philippine Airlines (PAL), Meralco (an electric company), Fortune Tobacco, numerous newspapers, radio and TV broadcasting companies (such as ABS-CBN), several banks (most notably the Philippine Commercial and Industrial Bank; PCIBank of the Lopezes [now BDO after merging with Equitable Bank and after BDO acquired the merged Equitable PCI]), and real estate in New York, California and Hawaii.[315] The Aquino government also accused them of skimming off foreign aid and international assistance.

During the ICIJ's (International Consortium of Investigative Journalists) expose of offshore leaks in April 2013, the name of his eldest daughter, Imee Marcos, appeared on the list of wealthy people involved in offshore financial secrecy. It was revealed that she is hiding parts of her father's ill-gotten wealth in tax havens in the British Virgin Islands.[316][317]

Comparisons have also been made between Ferdinand Marcos and Lee Kuan Yew's authoritarian style of governance and Singapore's success,[318] but in his autobiography, From Third World to First: The Singapore Story: 1965–2000, Lee relates:

It is a soft, forgiving culture. Only in the Philippines could a leader like Ferdinand Marcos, who pillaged his country for over 20 years, still be considered for a national burial. Insignificant amounts of the loot have been recovered, yet his wife and children were allowed to return and engage in politics.

— Lee Kuan Yew[319]

According to Presidential Commission on Good Government, the Marcos family and their cronies looted so much wealth from the Philippines that, to this day, investigators have difficulty determining precisely how many billions of dollars were stolen.[320] The agency claimed that Marcos stole around $5 to $10 billion from the Philippine treasury.[321][322][323][324] Adjusted for inflation, this would be equivalent to about USD10.6 to USD21.2 billion or almost 500 billion to 1 trillion Philippine pesos in 2014.[325]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b There is some disagreement between sources about whether President Bush said principle[149][150] or principles[151][152]

References

  1. ^ John Heilprin (April 13, 2015). "Political will guides Marcos case in Philippines". Swissinfo.
  2. ^ Wintrobe, Ronald (2000). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11, 132. ISBN 978-0-521-79449-7.
  3. ^ Roa, Ana (September 29, 2014). "Regime of Marcoses, cronies, kleptocracy". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  4. ^ Nick Davies (May 7, 2016). "The $10bn question: what happened to the Marcos millions?". The Guardian.
  5. ^ Mijares, Primitivo (1986). The Conjugal Dictatorship of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos (PDF). Union Square Publications.
  6. ^ a b Lacsamana, Leodivico Cruz (1990). Philippine History and Government (Second ed.). Phoenix Publishing House, Inc. ISBN 971-06-1894-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) p. 189.
  7. ^ Eduardo C. Tadem (November 24, 2016). "The Marcos debt". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  8. ^ Sudjic, Deyan (November 3, 2015). The Edifice Complex: How the Rich and Powerful Shape the World. The Penguin Press HC. ISBN 978-1-59420-068-7.
  9. ^ Lapeña, Carmela G.; Arquiza, Yasmin D. (September 20, 2012). "Masagana 99, Nutribun, and Imelda's 'edifice complex' of hospitals". GMA News Online.
  10. ^ Lico, Gerard (January 30, 2003). Edifice Complex: Power, Myth And Marcos State Architecture. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  11. ^ a b "Global Corruption Report" (PDF). Transparency International. Retrieved August 6, 2009.
  12. ^ "Global Corruption Report, p. 106". Transparency International. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  13. ^ "Global Programme Against Corruption, p. 274" (PDF). Transparency International. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  14. ^ a b Conde, Carlos H. (July 8, 2007). "Marcos family returning to the limelight in the Philippines". The New York Times.
  15. ^ a b "Report of an Amnesty International Mission to the Republic of the Philippines 22 November – 5 December 1975" (PDF). Amnesty International Publications. September 1976.
  16. ^ a b c "Alfred McCoy, Dark Legacy: Human rights under the Marcos regime". Hartford-hwp.com. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  17. ^ Maynigo, Benjamin. "Marcos fake medals redux (Part I)". Asian Journal USA.
  18. ^ Maynigo, Benjamin. "Marcos fake medals redux (Part II)". Asian Journal USA.
  19. ^ Bondoc, Jarius (April 8, 2011). "Suspicions resurface about Marcos heroism". Philippine Star.
  20. ^ a b c Gerth, Jeff; Brinkley, Joel (January 23, 1986). "Marcos's wartime role discredited in U.S. files". The New York Times.
  21. ^ Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. "'Official Program of the Inauguration of President Fidel V. Ramos'" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  22. ^ Introduction to "The Marcos Legacy: Economic Policy and Foreign Debt in the Philippines" (PDF). Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, Volume 3: Country Studies – Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Turkey. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1989. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  23. ^ http://pcij.org/stories/glorias-inglorious-record-biggest-debtor-least-popular/
  24. ^ Gillespie, Peter. "Lethal Liabilities: The Human Costs of Debt and Capital Flight". Third World Quarterly.
  25. ^ Butterfield, Fox (March 29, 1986). "Marcos's Fortune: Inquiry in Manila Offers Picture of How it was Acquired". The New York Times.
  26. ^ Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. "'Ferdinand E. Marcos, Twentieth State of the Nation Address, July 22, 1985". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  27. ^ a b Emmanuel S. de Dios (November 16, 2015). "The truth about the economy under the Marcos regime". BusinessWorld.
  28. ^ Ronald U. Mendoza (February 26, 2016). "Ferdinand Marcos' economic disaster". Rappler.
  29. ^ a b http://www.rappler.com/thought-leaders/123773-marcos-economic-disaster
  30. ^ Mahar Manghas. "'Monitoring Philippine Poverty By Operational and Sociatal Indicators'". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  31. ^ Asian Development Bank. "'Poverty in the Philippines'" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  32. ^ JC Punongbayan; Kevin Mandrilla (March 5, 2016). "Marcos years marked 'golden age' of PH economy? Look at the data". Rappler.
  33. ^ a b http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=PH&page=6
  34. ^ http://www.fedprimerate.com/wall_street_journal_prime_rate_history.htm
  35. ^ James K. Galbraith. "'The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too'". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  36. ^ Michael Mussa. "'C. Fred Bergsten and the World Economy, Volume 978, Issues 397–399'". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  37. ^ http://www.gov.ph/1972/09/21/proclamation-no-1081/
  38. ^ a b Doronila, Amando (September 24, 2014). "The night Marcos declared martial law". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  39. ^ a b "Declaration of Martial Law". The Official Gazette.
  40. ^ a b "FM Declares Martial Law". Philippines Sunday Express. September 24, 1972.
  41. ^ Rivett, Rohan (March 13, 1973). "The Mark of Marcos – Part I: A deafening silence in the Philippines". The Age.
  42. ^ Kushida, Kenji (2003). "The Political Economy of the Philippines Under Marcos – Property Rights in the Philippines from 1965–1986" (PDF). Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs.
  43. ^ a b Schirmer, Daniel B.; Shalom, Stephen Roskamm (1987). The Philippines Reader: A history of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship and Resistance. South End Press.
  44. ^ a b Celoza, Albert F. (1997). Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Praeger Publishers.
  45. ^ a b c "EX-COMMUNISTS PARTY BEHIND MANILA BOMBING". The Washington Post. August 4, 1989.
  46. ^ "Why not ask Ramos and Enrile about Martial Law". Manila Times. February 28, 2016 1976. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  47. ^ "REPORT OF AN AI MISSION TO THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES. 22 NOVEMBER – 5 DECEMBER 1975". Amnesty International. September 1, 1976.
  48. ^ a b Remollino, Alexander Martin (September 17, 2006). "Marcos Kin, Allies Still within Corridors of Power". Bulatalat. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  49. ^ a b "From Aquino's Assassination to People's Power". Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. Retrieved March 2, 2016.
  50. ^ Hoffman, David; Cannon, Lou; Coleman, Milton; Dewar, Helen; Goshko, John M.; Oberdorfer, Don; W, George C. (February 26, 1986). "In Crucial Call, Laxalt Told Marcos: 'Cut Cleanly'". The Washington Post.
  51. ^ Reaves, Joseph A. (February 26, 1986). "Marcos Flees, Aquino Rules – Peaceful Revolt Ends In Triumph". Chicago Tribune.
  52. ^ Benigno Aquino, Jr. (August 21, 1983). "The undelivered speech of Senator Benigno S. Aquino Jr. upon his return from the U.S., August 21, 1983". The Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.
  53. ^ Laurie, Jim (August 21, 1983). "Last interview with and footage of Ninoy Aquino assassination". YouTube. Retrieved June 30, 2010.
  54. ^ Kashiwara, Ken (October 16, 1983). "Aquino's Final Journey". The New York Times.
  55. ^ a b Tupaz, Edsel; Wagner, Daniel (October 13, 2014). "The Missing Marcos Billions and the Demise of the Commission on Good Government". The World Post.
  56. ^ Pazzibugan, Dona Z. (February 13, 2014). "PCGG recovers $29M from Marcos loot". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  57. ^ a b c Mogato, Manuel (February 24, 2016). "Philippines still seeks $1 billion in Marcos wealth 30 years after his ouster". Reuters.
  58. ^ http://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/01/05/09/corruption-power-struggle-mar-pcgg-work-2008
  59. ^ "Chronology of the Marcos Plunder". Asian Journal. Retrieved March 1, 2016.
  60. ^ Tantiangco, Aya; Bigtas, Jannielyn Ann (February 25, 2016). "What Marcoses brought to Hawaii after fleeing PHL in '86: $717-M in cash, $124-M in deposit slips". GMA News Online.
  61. ^ Heilprin, John (April 13, 2015). "Political Will guides Marcos case in Philippines". Swiss Broadcasting Corporation.
  62. ^ Roa, Ana (September 29, 2014). "Regime of Marcoses, cronies, kleptocracy". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  63. ^ Warde, Ibrahim (May 25, 2011). "From Marcos to Gaddafi: Kleptocrats, Old and New". The World Post.
  64. ^ Doyo, Ma. Ceres P. (October 12, 2014). "'Imeldific' collection of artworks (partial list)". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  65. ^ Macapendeg, Mac (September 21, 2012). "Martial Law fashion: The Imeldific and the Third World look". GMA News.
  66. ^ Arcache, Maurice (October 24, 2002). "An Imeldific dinner". The Philippine Star.
  67. ^ Tejero, Constantino C. (August 14, 2011). "Imeldific at 82". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  68. ^ a b c "Imelda Marcos and her road to vindication". GMA News. April 10, 2010. Retrieved August 25, 2013.
  69. ^ Marc Jayson Cayabyab (October 23, 2015). "Imelda Marcos allowed to travel to Singapore despite graft cases". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  70. ^ Ellison, Katherine (October 6, 2012). "The Steel Butterfly Still Soars". The New York Times.
  71. ^ a b The Great Gold Swindle: Yamashita's Gold. March 8, 2012. p. 354. ISBN 978-1105583117.
  72. ^ a b Japanese and U.S. World War II Plunder and Intrigue. November 24, 2010. p. 142.
  73. ^ Steinberg, David Joel (2000). The Philippines: A Singular and a Plural Place. Basic Books. pp. 115–116. ISBN 978-0-8133-3755-5.
  74. ^ Celoza, Albert F. (1997). Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: the political economy of authoritarianism. Greenwood Publishing. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-275-94137-6.
  75. ^ Mijares (1976), p. 237.
  76. ^ "CHAN ROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY: PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURTDECISIONS ON-LINE".
  77. ^ Justice Jose P. Laurel penned the ponencia (in People vs. Mariano Marcos, et al., 70 Phil. 468) with which Chief Justice Ramón Avanceña, Justices Imperial, Díaz and Horilleno all concurred.
  78. ^ See page 32, http://www.utoledo.edu/as/pdfs/100years.pdf
  79. ^ Miriam Santiago on love, loss and her home, Philippine Star, March 25, 2012.
  80. ^ a b c d "FERDINAND E. MARCOS". GOVPH. Retrieved March 10, 2016.
  81. ^ The Sydney Morning Herald accessed 10 March 2016
  82. ^ Ocampo, Ambeth (2010). Looking Back. Anvil Publishing, Inc. pp. 20–22. ISBN 978-971-27-2336-0.
  83. ^ White, Lynn (2014). Philippine Politics: Possibilities and Problems in a Localist Democracy.
  84. ^ Mijares (1976), p. 255.
  85. ^ "Ferdinand Emmanuel Edralin Marcos, Sr". October 8, 2007. Retrieved June 22, 2015.
  86. ^ According to Marcos's claims, Antonio Luna is supposedly a "cousin" of Fructuoso Edralin, and was supposedly present during the General's assassination at Cabanatuan, Nueva Ecija. Romualdez Francia, Beatriz (1988). Imelda and the clans: A story of the Philippines. Solar Publishing Corporation. ISBN 978-9711706319.
  87. ^ a b Gerth, Jeff; Brinkley, Joel (January 23, 1986). "Marcos's Wartime Role Discredited in U.S. Files". New York Times.
  88. ^ a b Sharkey, John. "New Doubts on Marcos' War Role". Washington Post. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) January 24, 1986
  89. ^ Agoncillo (1990), pp. 404–409.
  90. ^ a b c d Mijares (1976), pp. 246–254.
  91. ^ Maynigo, Benjamin. "MARCOS FAKE MEDALS REDUX (Part I)". Asian Journal USA. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) August 15, 2016
  92. ^ a b Sharkey, John. "The Marcos Mystery: Did the Philippine Leader Really Win the U.S. Medals for Valor?He Exploits Honors He May Not Have Earned". Washington Post. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) December 18, 1983
  93. ^ Bondoc, Jarius. "Marcos medals: Only 2 of 33 given in battle". Phil Star Global. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) April 29, 2011
  94. ^ Global Balita referencing an article that suggests Marcos did not earn the vast majority of the medals he claimed. http://globalbalita.com/2011/04/28/marcos-medals-only-2-of-33-given-in-battle/
  95. ^ Inquirer.net Opinion piece citing Bonifacio Gillego's book critical of Marcos's wartime history. http://opinion.inquirer.net/76363/sunset-boulevard
  96. ^ Bulatlat piece questioning the Marcos exploits during the war. http://bulatlat.com/news/5-19/5-19-bessang.htm
  97. ^ Orlando Sentinel article which claims the Marcos war history records as untrue. http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1986-01-23/news/0190270164_1_marcos-army-records-philippines
  98. ^ PCIJ.ORG article about which claims Marcos's wartime history as propaganda. http://pcij.org/i-report/2007/dynasty-building3.html
  99. ^ Asian Journal San Diego which has an article also claiming Marcos's exploits during world war two as untrue. http://asianjournalusa.com/marcos-fake-medals-redux-part-iii-p10829-168.htm
  100. ^ "Alfred W. McCoy Biography". University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of History. Archived from the original on August 28, 2011.
  101. ^ Robles, Raissa (May 17, 2011). "Eminent Filipino war historian slams Marcos burial as a "hero"". Raissa Robles: Inside Politics and Beyond. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  102. ^ http://www.gov.ph/1970/11/09/official-week-in-review-october-30-november-5-1970/
  103. ^ http://nluc.dmmmsu.edu.ph/?page_id=25
  104. ^ Robert Lapham, Bernard Norling. Lapham's Raiders: Guerrillas in the Philippines, 1942–1945. University Press of Kentucky.
  105. ^ http://www.philstar.com/news-feature/2016/07/04/1599425/file-no.-60-family-affair
  106. ^ Scott, William Henry (1992). Looking for the Prehispanic Filipino and Other Essays in the Philippine History. Quezon City: New Day Publishers. ISBN 971-10-0524-7.
  107. ^ McCoy, Alfred W. (1999). Closer than brothers: manhood at the Philippine Military Academy. Yale University Press. pp. 167–170. ISBN 978-0-300-07765-0.
  108. ^ Mijares (1976), p. 261.
  109. ^ http://www.gov.ph/downloads/1992/06jun/19920630-Ramos.pdf
  110. ^ a b Ferdinand Edralin Marcos. Philippines Senate
  111. ^ a b c malacanang.gov.ph
  112. ^ Reaves, Joseph A. (September 29, 1989). "Marcos Was More Than Just Another Deposed Dictator". Chicago Tribune."US Department of Defense official database of Distinguished Service Cross recipients".
  113. ^ ABS-CBN News. "' The press in a straitjacket'". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  114. ^ Mijares (1976).
  115. ^ Abinales, P.N. (2000). Making Mindanao: Cotabato and Davao in the formation of the Philippine nation-state. Ateneo de Manila University Press. p. 156. ISBN 978-971-550-349-5.
  116. ^ Agoncillo (1990), pp. 508–510.
  117. ^ Lieutenant General Larsen, Stanley Robert (1985) "Chapter III: The Philippines" in Allied Participation in Vietnam, U.S. Department of the Army[unreliable source?]
  118. ^ Timberman, David G. (1991). A changeless land: continuity and change in Philippine politics. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. p. 63.
  119. ^ Boudreau, Vincent (2004). Resisting dictatorship: repression and protest in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-521-83989-1.
  120. ^ Hedman, Eva-Lotta E. (2006). In the name of civil society: from free election movements to people power in the Philippines. University of Hawaii Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-8248-2921-6.
  121. ^ McCoy, Alfred W. (2009). Policing America's empire: the United States, the Philippines, and the rise of the surveillance state. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-299-23414-0.
  122. ^ Torrevillas-Suarez, Domini (March 29, 1970). "Finishing the Unfinished Revolution". Philippine Panorama.
  123. ^ Guillermo, Ramon (February 6, 2013). "Signposts in the History of Activism in the University of the Philippines". University of the Philippines. Retrieved November 19, 2016.
  124. ^ a b c d http://www.ndfp.org/historic-role-and-contributions-of-kabataang-makabayan/
  125. ^ https://josemariasison.org/building-the-peoples-army-and-waging-the-peoples-war/
  126. ^ a b c Lacaba, Jose F. (1982). Days of Disquiet, Nights of Rage: The First Quarter Storm & Related Events. Manila: Salinlahi Pub. House. pp. 11–45, 157–178.
  127. ^ a b https://philippinediaryproject.wordpress.com/1970/02/
  128. ^ a b c d https://philippinediaryproject.wordpress.com/1970/01/
  129. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/1973/02/18/archives/us-killer-reported-hired-in-a-plot-against-marcos-details-reported.html?_r=0
  130. ^ Foreign relations of the United States, 1969–1976, V. 20: Southeast Asia.
  131. ^ https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v20/d202
  132. ^ a b "Philippines". The World Bank. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
  133. ^ http://www.atimes.com/se-asia/CH30Ae02.html
  134. ^ http://www.rappler.com/nation/60279-ak47-communist-rebels
  135. ^ I-Witness, GMA 7 (November 18, 2013). "MV Karagatan, The Ship of the Chinese Communist". YouTube.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  136. ^ http://www.philstar.com/entertainment/2012/07/30/832892/untold-story-karagatan-i-witness
  137. ^ "THE PHILIPPINES: Farewell to Democracy". Time. January 29, 1973.
  138. ^ http://www.gov.ph/featured/declaration-of-martial-law/
  139. ^ Mendoza Jr, Amado (2009). "'People Power' in the Philippines, 1983–1986". Civil resistance and power politics: the experience of non-violent action from Gandhi to the present. Oxford University Press. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-19-955201-6. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  140. ^ Inquirer (September 21, 2011). "Demystifying Marcos' Martial Law Regime". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  141. ^ Manila Times (September 23, 2015). "Liberal and Communist parties provoked martial law imposition". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  142. ^ Brands, H.W. (1992). Bound to empire: the United States and the Philippines. Oxford University Press. p. 298. ISBN 978-0-19-507104-7.
  143. ^ Dolan, Ronald E., ed. (1991). "28. Proclamation 1081 and Martial Law". Philippines: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.
  144. ^ a b "Max Soliven recalls Ninoy Aquino: Unbroken". Philippines Star. October 10, 2008. Retrieved August 30, 2013.
  145. ^ "In many tongues, pope championed religious freedoms". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved August 21, 2006.
  146. ^ http://www.econ.upd.edu.ph/gerardo-p-sicat-the-economist-with-a-vision/
  147. ^ http://www.manilatimes.net/marcos-great-tragic-reformer/140937/
  148. ^ "Marcos: The Great, Tragic Reformer". Manila Times. November 11, 2014.
  149. ^ Smith, Tony (2012). America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy. Princeton University Press. p. 281. ISBN 1-4008-4202-6.
  150. ^ Shain, Yossi (1999). Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the U.S. and Their Homelands. Cambridge University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-521-64225-5.
  151. ^ Schmitz, David F. (2006). The United States and Right-Wing Dictatorships, 1965–1989. Cambridge University Press. p. 232. ISBN 978-1-139-45512-1.
  152. ^ Mother Jones Magazine. Mother Jones. June 1983. p. 35. ISSN 0362-8841.
  153. ^ For a detailed treatment of corruption under Marcos, see "The Marcos Kleptocracy". Corruption and money laundering: a symbiotic relationship. Macmillan. 2009. ISBN 978-0-230-61360-7. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  154. ^ Moran, Jon (June 1999). "Patterns of Corruption and Development in East Asia". Third World Quarterly. 20 (3): 579. doi:10.1080/01436599913695.
  155. ^ Bello, Walden (Winter 1985–1986). "Edging toward the Quagmire: The United States and the Philippine Crisis". World Policy Journal. 3 (1): 31.
  156. ^ Shalom, Stephen R. (1993). Imperial alibis: rationalizing U.S. intervention after the cold war. South End Press. p. 149. ISBN 978-0-89608-448-3.
  157. ^ Cesar Lumba. "Once Upon a Blue Dot". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  158. ^ https://www.britannica.com/place/Philippines/Martial-law
  159. ^ McCoy, Alfred W. (2009). An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-299-22984-9.
  160. ^ Wurfel, David (1988). Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Cornell University Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-8014-9926-5.
  161. ^ http://www.gov.ph/1969/01/27/ferdinand-e-marcos-fourth-state-of-the-nation-address-january-27-1969/
  162. ^ Zhao, Hong (2012). "Sino-Philippines Relations: Moving beyond South China Sea Dispute?". Journal of East Asian Affairs: 57. ISSN 1010-1608. Retrieved March 6, 2015 – via Questia. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  163. ^ http://pascn.pids.gov.ph/files/Discussions%20Papers/1999/pascndp9916.pdf
  164. ^ a b c d http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/149
  165. ^ https://www.britannica.com/topic/Alex-Boncayao-Brigade
  166. ^ http://www.philstar.com/opinion/354387/lakas-ng-bayan-candidates
  167. ^ The Ministry of Industry and Ministry of Trade were merged by President Ferdinand Marcos in 1981 as the Ministry of Trade and Industry.
  168. ^ The Ministry of Public Works, Transportation and Communications and Ministry of Public Highways were merged by President Ferdinand Marcos in 1981 as the Ministry of Public Works and Highways.
  169. ^ "Philippines: Together Again". Time. July 13, 1981.
  170. ^ Steinberg, David Joel (2000). The Philippines: a singular and a plural place. Westview Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-8133-3755-5.
  171. ^ http://www.academia.edu/7968626/LUTONG_MACOY_Philippine_Elections_under_the_Marcos_Regime_Comparisons_and_Lessons_for_Today
  172. ^ Rodis, Rodel (August 19, 2009). "Who ordered the hit on Ninoy Aquino?". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  173. ^ "Transcript of ABS-CBN Interview with Pablo Martinez, co-accused in the Aquino murder case". Retrieved April 19, 2015.
  174. ^ Blitz, Amy (2000). The contested state: American foreign policy and regime change in the Philippines. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 167–168. ISBN 978-0-8476-9934-6.
  175. ^ a b "Marcos Underwent Kidney Transplants, Doctors Say". Los Angeles Times. November 11, 1985.
  176. ^ Wurfel, David (1988). Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Cornell University Press. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-8014-9926-5.
  177. ^ Pace, Eric (September 29, 1989). "Autocrat With a Regal Manner, Marcos Ruled for 2 Decades". The New York Times. Retrieved January 24, 2011.
  178. ^ Pollard, Vincent Kelly (2004). Globalization, democratization and Asian leadership: power sharing, foreign policy and society in the Philippines and Japan. Ashgate Publishing. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-7546-1539-2.
  179. ^ Parnell, Philip C. (2003). "Criminalizing Colonialism: Democracy Meets Law in Manila". Crime's power: anthropologists and the ethnography of crime. Palgrave-Macmillan. p. 214. ISBN 978-1-4039-6179-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  180. ^ http://articles.latimes.com/1986-01-23/news/mn-28079_1_war-record
  181. ^ Foreign Policy in Focus (September 21, 2015). "What the Class Politics of World War II Mean for Tensions in Asia Today". Retrieved March 30, 2016. {{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  182. ^ Zunes, Stephen; Asher, Sarah Beth; Kurtz, Lester (November 5, 1999). Nonviolent Social Movements: A Geographical Perspective. Wiley. p. 129. ISBN 978-1-57718-076-0.
  183. ^ http://www.namfrel.com.ph/v2/photogallery/1986-tallyboard2.php
  184. ^ a b Manila Times. "'Setting the record straight on Edsa 1'". Retrieved August 30, 2015. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  185. ^ http://www.gov.ph/1990/10/03/the-final-report-of-the-fact-finding-commission-iv-military-intervention-in-the-philippines-1986-1987/
  186. ^ http://www.rappler.com/nation/84953-gringo-plot-kill-marcos-almonte-memoir
  187. ^ Crisostomo, Isabelo T. (April 1, 1987), Cory, Profile of a President: The Historic Rise to Power of Corazon., Branden Books, p. 257, ISBN 978-0-8283-1913-3, retrieved December 3, 2007.
  188. ^ Paul Sagmayao, Mercado; Tatad, Francisco S. (1986), People Power: The Philippine Revolution of 1986: An Eyewitness History, Manila, Philippines: The James B. Reuter, S.J., Foundation, OCLC 16874890
  189. ^ Lama, George de; Collin, Dorothy (February 26, 1986). "Marcos Flees, Aquino Rules". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 3, 2014. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  190. ^ Halperin, Jonathan J. (1987). The Other Side: How Soviets and Americans Perceive Each Other. Transaction Publishers. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-88738-687-9.
  191. ^ "Ferdinand E. Marcos". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  192. ^ a b Boyce, James K. (1993). The political economy of growth and impoverishment in the Marcos era. Ateneo de Manila University Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-971-550-096-8.
  193. ^ See Hutchcroft, Paul David (1998). Booty capitalism: the politics of banking in the Philippines. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-3428-0.
  194. ^ Introduction to "The Marcos Legacy: Economic Policy and Foreign Debt in the Philippines" (PDF). Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, Volume 3: Country Studies – Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Turkey. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1989. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  195. ^ a b http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=PH
  196. ^ Larkin, John A. (1993). "Sugar and the Origins of Modern Philippine Society". University of California Press.
  197. ^ Quirino, Carlos (1974). "History of the Philippine Sugar Industry". Kalayaan.
  198. ^ Kathleen M. Nadeau, p.xiv, 57 Quirino (2008). "The History of the Philippines". Greenwood Publishing Group.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  199. ^ http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9047.pdf
  200. ^ http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1984/05/the-roots-of-the-philippines-economic-troubles
  201. ^ Introduction to "The Marcos Legacy: Economic Policy and Foreign Debt in the Philippines" (PDF). Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, Volume 3: Country Studies – Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Turkey. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1989. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  202. ^ Aniceto C. Orbeta Jr., Structural Adjustment and Poverty Alleviation in the Philippines, Philippine Institute for Development Studies, April 1996.
  203. ^ "Philippines Unemployment Rate". IndexMundi.
  204. ^ Template:Cite url=
  205. ^ Diaz, Ronald Echalas. "PHILIPPINE LAWS, STATUTES AND CODES – CHAN ROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY". chanrobles.com.
  206. ^ http://acraa.com/images/pdf/DCRA.pdf
  207. ^ "RP&#146;s biggest credit research firms form alliance". philstar.com.
  208. ^ Frank Senauth. "'The Making of the Philippines'": 103. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  209. ^ Alagappa, Muthiah, ed. (1998). "The Philippines: State Versus Society?". Asian security practice: material and ideational influences. Stanford University Press. p. 554. ISBN 978-0-8047-3348-9. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  210. ^ Nadeau, Kathleen M. (2002). Liberation theology in the Philippines: faith in a revolution. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-275-97198-4.
  211. ^ Kang, David C. (2002). Crony capitalism: corruption and development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-521-00408-4.
  212. ^ Sidel, John Thayel (1999). Capital, coercion, and crime: bossism in the maPhilippines. Stanford University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8047-3746-3.
  213. ^ Crewdson, John (March 23, 1986). "Marcos Graft Staggering – Investigators Trace Billions In Holdings". Chicago Tribune.
  214. ^ Boyce, James K. (2002). The political economy of the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 43–44. ISBN 978-1-84376-108-2.
  215. ^ http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPHILIPPINES/Resources/Habito-word.pdf
  216. ^ "Rice paddies". FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture. Retrieved March 20, 2011.
  217. ^ "Agronomy: Rice of the Gods". TIME. June 14, 1968. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  218. ^ http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/181877/news/specialreports/hacienda-luisita-s-past-haunts-noynoy-s-future
  219. ^ http://opinion.inquirer.net/18261/gloria-macapagal-arroyo-farmers-victorious-vs-aquino-hacienda
  220. ^ "Marcos Economy Golden Age of PH? Look at the Data". Rappler.
  221. ^ Introduction to "The Marcos Legacy: Economic Policy and Foreign Debt in the Philippines" (PDF). National Bureau of Economic Research. 1989.
  222. ^ "The dismal record of the Marcos regime". Philippine Star.
  223. ^ "Martial Law and It's Aftermath". US Library of Congress.
  224. ^ "The Marcos legacy of fraudulent and illegitimate debts". Freedom from debt coalition.
  225. ^ "Aquino's Vice President Asks Sympathy for Ailing Marcos". New York Times. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  226. ^ http://www.doylaurel.ph/from_the_lips_of_a_dying_president.html
  227. ^ "Doy on Macoy". The Philippine Star. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  228. ^ http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1036706
  229. ^ http://articles.latimes.com/1993-07-20/news/mn-15027_1_imelda-marcos
  230. ^ "Philippines blast wrecks Marcos bust". BBC News. December 29, 2002. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  231. ^ "Is Philippines ready for a state burial for Marcos?". ABS-CBN. March 14, 2016.
  232. ^ "Galawang Hokage: Youth protest sudden Marcos burial at LNMB". GMA News.
  233. ^ "Briefer on the Philippine Legion of Honor". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  234. ^ The Philippine Free Press (January 1, 1966). "Ferdinand E. Marcos, Man of the Year, 1965". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  235. ^ The Guinness Book of World Records 1989. Bantam. p. 400. ISBN 0-553-27926-2.
  236. ^ The Guinness Book of World Records 1991. Bantam. p. 552. ISBN 0-553-28954-3.
  237. ^ The Guinness Book of World Records 1999. Bantam. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-553-58075-4.
  238. ^ Laguatan, Ted (June 30, 2013). "Adding insult to injury: UP College named after Marcos' Prime Minister". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  239. ^ Doyo, Ma. Ceres P. (March 18, 2004). "Thief and Dictator". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  240. ^ "Greatest robbery of a Government". Guinness World Records. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  241. ^ "Briefer: Bintang Republik Indonesia (Star of the Republic of Indonesia)". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  242. ^ "Filipino recipients of Japanese decorations and Japanese recipients of Philippine decorations". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  243. ^ "President's Week in Review: March 1 – March 9, 1976". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  244. ^ "The Order of pro Merito Melitensi". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  245. ^ "President's Week in Review: April 7 – April 13, 1975". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  246. ^ a b "Filipino recipients of Spanish Decorations". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  247. ^ Business Mirror (November 13, 2015). "Marcos's unmatched legacy: Hospitals, schools and other infrastructures". {{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  248. ^ http://www.pncc.ph/projects_slex.htm
  249. ^ http://www.snaboitiz.com/?page_id=4727
  250. ^ http://www.firstgen.com.ph/our-business/our-power-plants/#Hydro
  251. ^ a b http://www.energy.com.ph/edc-at-a-glance/who-we-are/
  252. ^ http://aboitizpower.com/generation/geothermal/apri/plants/
  253. ^ Business Mirror (October 30, 2015). "Marcos's unmatched legacy: Energy". {{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  254. ^ http://lopezlink.ph/employee-news/milestones/7002-energy-development-corporation-milestones.html
  255. ^ http://www.econ.upd.edu.ph/dp/index.php/dp/article/viewFile/679/144.
  256. ^ Business Mirror (November 7, 2015). "Marcos's unmatched legacy: Education". {{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  257. ^ http://www.ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/temp/10-03/home/State%20Universities%20and%20Colleges%20Statistical%20Bulletin.pdf
  258. ^ http://www.ched.gov.ph
  259. ^ Executive Intelligence Review (August 23, 1985). "The Philippines' Battle for Development" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  260. ^ Christian Science Monitor (September 19, 1980). "A range of 11 big industrial projects is in the works". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  261. ^ http://www.pnoc.com.ph/aboutpnoc.php?sectionid=ac587724-1514-11df-a7de-92d1637a39b1&menuid=b9077b2f-154e-11df-93b0-42bae035655c
  262. ^ http://www.pasar.com.ph/content/our-story/our-story/
  263. ^ a b Business Mirror (November 13, 2015). "Marcos's unmatched legacy". {{cite journal}}: |last= has generic name (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help).
  264. ^ Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. "Presidential Decrees". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  265. ^ http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2015/12/27/1536601/lawmakers-pass-14-laws-year
  266. ^ Christian Science Monitor (September 19, 1980). "Meet Arturo Tanco, a technocrat who tends the vital farming front". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  267. ^ Rappler (February 10, 2016). "Marcos best president if not for dictatorship – Duterte". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  268. ^ http://www.da.gov.ph/index.php/about-us/history
  269. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Ferdinand Marcos". University of the Philippines Integrated Library System. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
  270. ^ http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2012/april2012/189434.htm
  271. ^ http://globalnation.inquirer.net/54454/marcoses-lose-us-appeal
  272. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/14/nyregion/aide-to-imelda-marcos-is-sentenced-in-sale-of-masterpieces.html
  273. ^ http://news.abs-cbn.com/focus/07/09/15/time-taking-its-toll-martial-law-victims
  274. ^ a b http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323494504578343254294114668
  275. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/03/nyregion/marcos-verdict-marcos-cleared-all-charges-racketeering-fraud-case.html?pagewanted=all
  276. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/1993/09/24/world/marcos-convicted-of-graft-in-manila.html
  277. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/187295.stm
  278. ^ "Imelda Marcos Acquitted, Again". The New York Times. March 11, 2008.
  279. ^ "MARCOS CONVICTED OF GRAFT IN MANILA". The New York Times. September 24, 1993.
  280. ^ CNN Library (January 24, 2013). "Imelda Marcos Fast Facts". CNN. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  281. ^ Gil Cabacungan (October 29, 2012). "Marcoses lose US appeal". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  282. ^ http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/734042/imelda-marcos-allowed-to-travel-to-singapore-despite-graft-cases
  283. ^ http://toymphilippines.blogspot.com/2009/07/list-of-toym-awardees-1959-2008_6165.html
  284. ^ Guevara, Marina Walker. "ICIJ releases database revealing thousands of secret offshore companies". icij.org.
  285. ^ "Search results for "marcos"". icij.org.
  286. ^ "Search results for "marcos"". icij.org.
  287. ^ "Search results for "araneta"". icij.org.
  288. ^ "Search results for "kalaw"". icij.org.
  289. ^ Davies, Nick. "The $10bn question: what happened to the Marcos millions?". the Guardian.
  290. ^ Brysk, Alison (2005). Human rights and private wrongs: constructing global civil society. Psychology Press. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-415-94477-9.
  291. ^ Hranjski, Hrvoje (September 12, 2006). "No hero's resting place as Imelda Marcos finds site for husband's grave". The Scotsman. UK. Archived from the original on January 5, 2008. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  292. ^ Corruption and anti-corruption. Asia-Pacific Press. 2001. pp. 99–110. ISBN 978-0-7315-3660-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  293. ^ "Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative: Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos (Switzerland)". World Bank.
  294. ^ "Article Index – INQUIRER.net". Archived from the original on November 12, 2005. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  295. ^ "Honolulu Star-Bulletin Editorials". Starbulletin.com. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  296. ^ "Hunt for tyrant's millions leads to former model's home". Sydney Morning Herald. Australia. July 4, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  297. ^ Schirmer, Daniel B.; Shalom, Stephen R. (1987). The Philippines reader: a history of colonialism, neocolonialism, dictatorship, and resistance. South End Press. p. 361. ISBN 978-0-89608-275-5.
  298. ^ Stephens, Beth (2008). International human rights litigation in U.S. courts. BRILL. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-57105-353-4.
  299. ^ jurist.law.pitt.edu, Supreme Court rules in Marcos assets
  300. ^ supremecourt.gov, REPUBLIC OF PHILIPPINES ET AL. v. PIMENTEL, June 12, 2008, No. 06–1204
  301. ^ "Court ruling hinders Marcos victims seeking funds". USA Today. June 12, 2008.
  302. ^ Oliveros, Benjie (September 17, 2006). "The Specter of Martial Law". Bulatalat. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  303. ^ Villanueva, Marichu A. (March 10, 2006). "Imee's '20–20'". The Philippine Star. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
  304. ^ Delusions of a Dictator: The Mind of Marcos As Revealed in His Secret Diaries. William C. Rempel. Little Brown & Co, 1993.
  305. ^ Padilla, Arnold. "Taxpayers To Pay Marcos Debt Until 2025, IBON features Vol X No. 42". Ibon Foundation.
  306. ^ http://www.treasury.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Outstanding-Treasury-Bonds-as-of-August-31-2016.pdf
  307. ^ https://www.bondsupermart.com/main/bond-info/bond-selector?execution=e1s2
  308. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/10/business/philippine-debt-dispute.html
  309. ^ https://asiancorrespondent.com/2011/02/cory-aquinos-betrayal-of-people-power/
  310. ^ http://www.bulatlat.com/news/4-33/4-33-marcosdebt.html
  311. ^ http://www.scmp.com/article/737701/ongpin-last-top-official-take-his-life
  312. ^ "Brownouts Darken Outlook for Aquino : Philippines: Power outages cripple industry and snarl traffic. Criticism has focused on the president". The Los Angeles Times. April 24, 1990.
  313. ^ "World's Ten Most Corrupt Leaders1". Infoplease.com Source: Transparency International Global Corruption Report 2004. Retrieved August 6, 2009.
  314. ^ Paterno, Vicente (2014). On My Terms. Anvil.
  315. ^ "Jovito R. Salonga, Some highlights". Hartford-hwp.com. Retrieved October 20, 2008.
  316. ^ "Secret Files Expose Offshore's Global Impact". ICIJ. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
  317. ^ "BIR chief ready to investigate Pinoys with offshore accounts".
  318. ^ Taruc, Paolo (March 24, 2015). "Different legacies: Ferdinand Marcos and Lee Kuan Yew". CNN.
  319. ^ Diola, Camille (March 23, 2015). "15 things Lee Kuan Yew said about the Philippines". The Philippine Star.
  320. ^ Mydans, Seth (March 31, 1991). "Hunt for Marcos's Billions Yields More Dead Ends Than Hard Cash". New York Times.
  321. ^ Hunt, Luke (January 8, 2013). "End of 30-Year Hunt for Marcos Billions?". The Diplomat, Asian Beat section.
  322. ^ Komisar, Lucy (August 2, 2002). "Marcos' Missing Millions". In These Times.
  323. ^ Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. Continuum Publishing. 2011. p. 135. ISBN 978-1-4411-7396-6. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  324. ^ Henry, James S.; Bradley, Bill (2005). "Philippine Money Flies". The Blood Bankers: Tales from the Global Underground Economy. Basic Books. p. 43. ISBN 978-1-56025-715-8.
  325. ^ "Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI Inflation Calculator". United States Department of Labor.

Sources

Further reading