User talk:Pnick ramirez2097/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:57, 2 March 2017

Prof Garcia's Comments

Week 2

Nicholas: please take more time to do your assignments in the future. Your answers on the content gap were meager and unacceptable. You need to write MUCH more than that in order to pass the assignments. Your analysis of Animism, moreover, was insufficient. You did not put in any real effort into this assignment, unfortunately, and it shows. Alfgarciamora (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Week 6

Peer Edit Comments @Pnick ramirez2097: Hey Nick! Just a couple of quick comments here. I believe that you could have done a bit better on the edit front, there seems to be some information missing from the draft. You can definitely add a works section towards the end perhaps in table form with a brief explanation of each work, if that's what you were planning on doing before- remember, you want people to be able to find information quickly and not have to really dig for it. I like that you've started formatting your headers, but it would be so much better to do just a bit more research before delving into the article. So far, ok. Good luck and have a good time writing! DDenord (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:56, 2 March 2017 edit DDenord (talk \| contribs) 68 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:57, 2 March 2017 edit undo DDenord (talk \| contribs) 68 edits →Week 6 Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Peer Edit Comments		Peer Edit Comments
	{{ping\|~~Pnickramirez2097~~}} Hey Nick! Just a couple of quick comments here. I believe that you could have done a bit better on the edit front, there seems to be some information missing from the draft. You can definitely add a works section towards the end perhaps in table form with a brief explanation of each work, if that's what you were planning on doing before- remember, you want people to be able to find information quickly and not have to really dig for it. I like that you've started formatting your headers, but it would be so much better to do just a bit more research before delving into the article. So far, ok. Good luck and have a good time writing! [[User:DDenord\|DDenord]] ([[User talk:DDenord\|talk]]) 01:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)		{{ping\|Pnick ramirez2097}} Hey Nick! Just a couple of quick comments here. I believe that you could have done a bit better on the edit front, there seems to be some information missing from the draft. You can definitely add a works section towards the end perhaps in table form with a brief explanation of each work, if that's what you were planning on doing before- remember, you want people to be able to find information quickly and not have to really dig for it. I like that you've started formatting your headers, but it would be so much better to do just a bit more research before delving into the article. So far, ok. Good luck and have a good time writing! [[User:DDenord\|DDenord]] ([[User talk:DDenord\|talk]]) 01:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)