Jump to content

User talk:KGirlTrucker81: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1,029: Line 1,029:
At [[Hamza Laalioui]]; three minutes after creation. More haste less speed, eh. Sorry to have to post here. Take care, &mdash; [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna!'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' Imperatrix mundi.'''''</sup></span>]] 12:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
At [[Hamza Laalioui]]; three minutes after creation. More haste less speed, eh. Sorry to have to post here. Take care, &mdash; [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna!'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' Imperatrix mundi.'''''</sup></span>]] 12:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
:The consensus strictly applies to A1 and A3 only, and I think you're incorrect about it. [[User:KGirlTrucker81|<span style="background-color: pink; color: white">'''KGirlTrucker81'''</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:KGirlTrucker81|<span style= "color:pink">huh?</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/KGirlTrucker81|what I've been doing]]</sup> 12:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
:The consensus strictly applies to A1 and A3 only, and I think you're incorrect about it. [[User:KGirlTrucker81|<span style="background-color: pink; color: white">'''KGirlTrucker81'''</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:KGirlTrucker81|<span style= "color:pink">huh?</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/KGirlTrucker81|what I've been doing]]</sup> 12:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

== Please re-review page - all concerns taken care of ==

My colleague created a page with some mistakes - [[[[Draft:SAP_Web_IDE]]]]. I ([[Special:Contributions/195.93.234.8|195.93.234.8]] ([[User talk:195.93.234.8|talk]]) 06:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)) have taken care of all the concerns -- notability, sourcing -- and believe it is ready to be released. It is as sourced and notable as hundreds of already approved Wikipedia pages on similar subjects. Can you re-review the page? If OK, should I remove the warnings? Thanks for reviewing in the first place.

Revision as of 06:45, 5 March 2017

This user has opted out of talkbacks

Speedy tagging

Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for patrolling articles. It is suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created, as you did at Society of Chartered Financial Analysts of the United Kingdom. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -- samtar talk or stalk 13:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but sometimes it can be deleted by other admins fastly and hasty is not required to do this. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a competition. If you leave a page for half an hour and someone else deletes it, who cares? samtar's point was that you should wait and see if a page will be developed. I got pissed off when I created a page and had it tagged while I was in the process of adding more content, and I'm an experienced editor. Imagine how it would feel as a relatively new editor. Primefac (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
Only clear non-notable subjects such as this one: "Caroline Douglas is a awesome and funny person" and usually issue an {{uw-autobiography}} or {{uw-notsocialnetwork}} to show Wikipedia is not Facebook or LinkedIn. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Once again your comments are completely illogical and irrelevant to what has previously been said. Please, listen to what these two have to say, as experienced editors. Patient Zerotalk 20:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tactical Edge, Inc.

Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for reviewing my article about Tactical Edge, Inc. However, while my talk page says that the article has been created, it does not appear that it was actually created. I can't find any evidence of the article anywhere. I'm new to Wikipedia editing, so perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place? You accepted the article at 20:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC). Would appreciate any help you can provide in getting the article visible. Thanks. Garberinotalk

Garberino, it appears that shortly after being accepted, your draft was PRODded and subsequently deleted on 14 November 2016. I'm rather surprised that you did not receive notification of the PROD tags being placed on the page. Ronhjones was the one who deleted the page, so you should talk to them about possibly undeleting the article. Primefac (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Nice work--beat me to AIV reporting! JustBerry (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing comments from other user's talk pages

Please don't remove comments from other user's talk pages. Per WP:OWNTALK, user talk pages are subject to thegeneral userpage guidelines on handling inappropriate content, which say that content should only be removed from another user's user space if it is something that must be addressed urgently ("for example, unambiguous copyright, attack, defamation, or BLP reasons, etc."). Comments that are simply offtopic, not formatted correctly, misplaced, etc. should be left up to the talk page owner to remove. In the case of my talk page, the comment you removed was clearly an attempt by an inexperienced user to call my attention to what they perceived to be an error in a Wikipedia article. While they may or may not be correct, and the comment wasn't formatted per the usual Wikipedia guidelines, a content dispute is an appropriate thing to be on a user's talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake, I thought it was vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPR

Hi. When reviewing new pages, please consider adding categories where none exist. It only takes a few moments. There is an excellent tool displayed on every page that does most of the work for you. It's called HotCat. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I may add cats on BLPs and other articles and if necessary. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

The edit I made on Carlos Gomez was not vandalism. I made the photo size to 2,000 but changed it back with in 5 seconds. Seriously? That is not vandalism now get a clue. 75.87.162.172 (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit seems vandalism because altering the pixel size into a larger size could've been vandalism. So, please edit constrictively. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 01:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Sandwich testing, KGirlTrucker81.

Unfortunately Lourdes has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Wrong CSD template; it's not an organized event

To reply, leave a comment on Lourdes's talk page.

December 2016

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Toufique Ahmed, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  {MordeKyle  23:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MordeKyle: looks like you may have made a mistake here... -- samtar talk or stalk 23:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MordeKyle: repinging because I messed that ping up -- samtar talk or stalk 23:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And he just templated me! Please read my talk header. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm more interested as to how this came about - whereas your wishes to not be templated should be taken into consideration, I'm afraid you can't stop editors using them :( -- samtar talk or stalk 23:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
samtar, without seeing how the page was created, my guess is KGirl moved the page at some point. I've had a fair number of "creations" simply due to the fact that I moved a page and its creation got credited to me. Primefac (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: that was my first thought, however it only has two revisions - the creation by Toufiquekhans and then the tag by KGirl.. It's no big deal, I just want to make sure MordeKyle isn't patrolling things a little two quick and being a bit click happy! -- samtar talk or stalk 00:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Samtar: It was a mistake, it was supposed to be a Hasty notice for an A7 after only a few minutes after article creation.  {MordeKyle  00:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (what are the issues)

Hi you just reviewed and rejected my sandbox .....plz help me out with the issues and how I can fix it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nabeelgm/sandbox


Thanks..... 😃 Nabeelgm 😃

Well, everything seems to be an test but if you want to write an article, please get started on it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello KGirlTrucker81,
Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

Your Review in May 18

Hello, i just wanted to inform you that the date regarding the birth of Johannes Glauber was added by the ip address itself in the main article without any conclusive source for that addition.I would request you to Unaccept that revision or delete that entry altogether.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 13:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Param Mudgal talk? 13:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zamzam -- request for help

hi, thank you for reviewing zamzam_ship. I am a newbie and would like to request your help with the disambiguation page for zamzam. Right now, searching on zamzam leads to the disambiguation page (including links to well, ship, party, and soft drink). I think searching on zamzam should redirect straight to the zamzam well page, and then all the other pages should be offered on the disambiguation page. It is not clear to me how to make a search redirect to a single page by default. Can you help me fix this please? thank you. Lcb03 (talk) 16:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)lcb03[reply]

Well, disambiguation pages are entries at the same word (like "do you mean") etc. You can add Zamzam (ship) to the dab page with a short description of the subject. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I must not be explaining the problem clearly. Let me try again. When you search wikipedia for the word "spoon," it takes you directly to the "spoon_utensil" page, and then that page offers links to the spoon disambiguation page. In contrast, when you search wikipedia for the word "zamzam," it takes you directly to the zamzam disambiguation page. I think searching on zamzam should take the user directly to the zamzam_well page, and then that page should offer links to the disambiguation page and the other pages (on ship, party, and softdrink).Lcb03 (talk) 16:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Yes, that's what dab and redirect notice templates used to do. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great, so I think we have the same understanding of what should happen. I tried to use the templates correctly on the zamzam page but clearly failed. I can't figure out how to make the zamzam search act like the spoons search. So I'm hoping that with your expertise you can help fix it so it works the way it should. Let me know if I should ask elsewhere. Thanks.Lcb03 (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The usage of the template are like this: {{Redirect|subject|article name}} If you want more questions, visit the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:05:59, 13 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Littlebigadventure


Hi KGirlTrucker81,

Many thanks for your time on my short work.

I could not locate the 'resubmit' button anywhere after editing my draft today so am wondering if you can please shed some light.

Cheers,

Littlebigadventure (talk) 01:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you submitted your draft for review yet? Just put {{subst:submit}} at the top when your finished. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



request for creating Marwa Al Mamari

Hi KGirlTrucker81 @KGirlTrucker81: I'm trying to create an article about Marwa Al Mamari but you SpeedDeleted it.

Please advice with the exact reasons and if by any chance you can create it and I can provide you with all the documents and requirements.

Your assistance is highly appreciated.

thanksFan77777 (talk) 12:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This person is non-notable and no independent third-party sources such as a news review. Think if a person is mentioned by a news source. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KGirlTrucker81: I have uploaded one of the newspapers Al Khaleej Newspaper article about her, and there are more. please check my uploads, however, the articles are all written in Arabic, but i am uploading more. Al khaleej Newspaper is a very well known national newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, Dubai, Sharjah, and they did identify her and note her as the Editor in Chief of Salfa Electronic Magazine, salfa.co Please adviceFan77777 (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC) @KGirlTrucker81: I have uploaded the newspapers to the article and added the references, please check. Thanks Fan77777 (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page has now been deleted by admin, so next time create an draft version. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arijit Singh

The info about the song of Kabil.. That is Mujhe Kehne De zara is inappropriate...!! If it's not! Please let me know!! As this song is yet not released or officially not declined as the part of the film!! Nishant Saini (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know about your views on the songs as long you cite sources to confirm it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you patrolled this article. Note that Ricardo Semprun without the punctuation has been salted. Is there a reason you didn't try to move the article to Ricardo Semprun before marking it patrolled? Oftentimes socks will pull stunts like this to circumvent the title blacklist. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gstigler. Please don't patrol a suspiciously-titled page like this one again without doing a little digging first. Sro23 (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I didn't move this one either. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You should always try to move a page to its best title (in this case, removing an unnecessary period). Primefac (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

December 2016

Hi,how do i get to put links on a page that i have created,i am finding my pages getting deleted because of this Wangina (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because look at your talk page, two CSD notices and one being a copyright violation. I'll suggest you create an article via the AFC process. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14:53:15, 16 December 2016 review of submission by Namik Paul


Hi wondering why the update is declined? do you guys need more articles of of news paper? i didn't get why the information is not verifiable? what kind information you need to verify it. Pls help thanks

Your actual submission contains unreliable sources(Blogs, interviews, social media, IMDB etc.) which is not acceptable. See WP:RS for more information. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 20:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 16:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ATMIA - ATM Industry Association (22 Dec 2016)

Hello

In other to address "notability" issues I have a) added sources specifically dealing with ATMIA rather than quoting once / one sentence in the article; b) diversified sources by adding others than ATMmarketplace and Finextra ; c) removed previous bulleted lists; c) reduced number of sources in half (from 80+ to 38)

Look forward to hearing from you in due course, season's greetings

Bernardo CIM2014 (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I declined your submission again because some words are too peacocky. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources Question

What are good sources to establish notability for new actors and politicians?Capolitico (talk) 21:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Such as major news reviews, journals, and books. See WP:RS for more information. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And IMDB isn't a good source for movies or actors?Capolitico (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly it's an unreliable source. See also Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03:03:28, 23 December 2016 review of submission by Verelitoradzeebi



Hi,

I have resubmitted the article in English. I also have it in Georgian and would like to add after the initial approval from you of the English version. Let me know how I can help in this process. This is the tragic story of my family in Tbilisi Georgia that has a lot of information in it.

lookinging forward to hearing from you! Thank you! (Verelitoradzeebi (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)).[reply]

I declined your submission again because it's not written in neutral tone, and possibly fails WP:GNG. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ATMIA - ATM Industry Association (23 Dec 2016)

Hello

Many thanks for the prompt response and comments. I have endeavored to make the text more neutral.

Look forward to hearing from you and Happy holidays!!

Bernardo CIM2014 (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done and now moved to mainspace. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bot

Hi @User:KGirlTrucker81 regarding your message on my talk page about Hello Bot, I was wondering did I use A1 hastily ? FITINDIA (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fitindia: Yes, within 4 minutes of creation and you've just bitten a newbie. Please review WP:NPPNICE. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@KGirlTrucker81: am always nice to newbies and I have read WP:NPPNICE :) Thank you FITINDIA (talk) 20:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @KGirlTrucker81: The page you tagged for speedy Devil shopee looks more like a G11 to me and its a newbie and its under 5 minutes :) FITINDIA (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's only a suggestion when I do A7 speedies but I still wait ten minutes if this clearly meets A1 or A3. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Great working with you (not sharing cubicles, but ...) Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Quis separabit? 22:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ATMIA orphan tag (24 Dec 2016)

Hello Thanks for the additional edits. Rearding the orphan tag to the new contribution, ATM Industry Association is referenced in the following Wiki pages:

cash machine / Automated Teller Machine (twice) Windows XP (which corroborates footnote 8 in the current ATMIA article page) KAL Software MegaLink Oberthur Cash Protection

All these were referenced back in the "See also" section of the ATMIA. I also added the ref back (ie "[[") to these but not showing when I search Wiki or using Google (for ATMIA). In any case, this is a minor technical issue and I do believe the "orphan" tag is unwarranted.

Thanks Bernardo CIM2014 (talk) 10:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see a bunch of redlinks which also a orphan too. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CIM2014, it is indeed no longer an orphan, so I've removed the tag. Primefac (talk) 16:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker) Adding the @CIM2014: since I messed it up earlier Primefac (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you! CIM2014 (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects

In the future, please take more time to look at proposed redirects at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. I just accepted five redirects you rejected, all of which were listed as alternative names in the target article's infobox or lede or were simple rephrasings of the proposed target article's name (e.g. Sunday Night Football on ESPN vs ESPN Sunday Night Football). These are all valid redirects which should be accepted unless there's some pressing reason not to (e.g. multiple shows of that name). Thanks, and hope the holiday season is going well for you. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:15:04, 24 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Fabulatuaest


Removed link to blog that provided archive of newspaper article; added citation to newspaper article.

Fabulatuaest (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now you can resubmit for review which I'm happy to accept it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 03:41:05, 25 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Peterb1234



Peterb1234 (talk) 03:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your feedback on the article Williamsburg Independent Film Festival. More sources have been added hopefully providing notability and verifiable back up. We are great admires of the dedication and importance of the work you do on Wikipedia's behalf, and would be honored to be included. I hope given the Holiday spirit - maybe we can be allowed to continue the process. Signed peterb1234

Please place {{subst:submit}} at the top when your finished. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: M G Leonard

Hello KGirlTrucker81. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of M G Leonard, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The previous AFD was delete for an "As yet unpublished children's author." this article may be about the same subject but is not "substantially identical". Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 14:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: rejection of Draft:List_of_prohibited_activities_in_the_United_States

Hello, "List of..." articles on Wikipedia often have few or no outside sources, because they summarize many other Wikipedia articles. For example, here are three "List of..." articles with 0-1 outside sources:

Also, topics like abortion, child porn, and prostitution are obviously notable. Please reconsider your rejection. Thank you 96.241.172.86 (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One source don't have automatic inherited notability. You need more references rather just the source itself. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for commenting about draft pseudo-pseudogenes.

However,realize that this is a VERY new concept and I cited the FIRST paper that coined the term, less than 2 months ago! I'm going to add one more reference soon, and I intend to keep updating the article, but what I've got is just about state of the art. Thanks again for resding this, as I am a newbie and this is my first attempt at using "talk". Dennis Drdfp (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Primefac declined your submission because there's no secondary sources such as major news reviews. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more copyvio by this editor, this time from here. Doug Weller talk 14:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:59:15, 28 December 2016 review of submission by Msbitinkov


Hi, just wanted to check why the submission was declined. The majority of proofs in this case are the pictures, I have added links to them including those on FMD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msbitinkov (talkcontribs) 16:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Msbitinkov, please read The Golden Rule; your draft is currently failing the first (and most important) point - there is simply no significant coverage of Inga Barkovska. The galleries may "prove" that she had per pictures taken, but we need words on the page to say who she is and why she's notable. See WP:YFA for more information about improving the page. Primefac (talk) 17:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

December 2016

Lzzjsd (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC) G'day mate, I suggested the term "Surrogate Friendship" on the Friendship page and it has been reverted. Any good reason? I think this new section is rather important because the "friendship" term has now become the "function" on social sites and the activity to how things up.. I would appreciate your giving reasons for such decision. Thanks Lzzjsd (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to cite a source when adding a new section. If you need help on referencing, see WP:Referencing for beginners. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of submission Draft:SAP_Web_IDE

Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for reviewing the article on SAP Web IDE. I saw that the reject reason was regarding information sources. Following yours and others reviews I improved it, I used as many independent (non-SAP) sources as possible. I used "Enterprise IT World", "CIO", "insideSAP", "TechTarget", "Forbes" and more. I'd appreciate if you can let me know how I can make this article better and published :-). Raz.korn (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, SwisterTwister declined your submission again because it still doesn't have independent third-party sources rather than press releases. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks again for reviewing the article on SAP Web IDE. I made the corrections you suggested, which should resolve the issue. Now I have articles from "Computer Weekly", "Forrester Research" and other truly independent and reliable sources. I believe these sources make the case that SAP Web IDE is significant. I'd appreciate if you can approve the article. Raz.korn (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have not resubmitted your draft for re-review yet. Click on the "resubmit" button to proceed. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi KGirlTrucker81, I apologize. I had the notion that I should consult/talk to you in order to make sure the new draft answers your rejection before re-submitting. I clicked the "resubmit" button. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raz.korn (talkcontribs) 14:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I declined your submission again because it still has PR reviews which are unreliable sources. I highly suggest you read Your first article before making further improvements. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... Educational Service Wrokers Ok I understand why you are saying it is copyright, because you use this tool https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Educational_Service_Workers&url=&oldid=757416192 and because I rely heavily on that article it said an above 70% chance copyright infringement but if you look closely I quote and cite everything. Please remove the tag? Rebekahalnablack (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can contest the CSD by clicking the button that says "Contest this speedy deletion", but please don't remove it. Let the admins decide whether delete it or not. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:36:48, 1 January 2017 review of submission by Daniela-S



Dear KGirlTrucker81, Thank you for your amazingly quick response to the wiki page I'm trying to create for my friend Daniela Sieff. I've never done one before. I've read the recommended pages and have tried to make changes to the original submission, removing links to bitly.com and replacing them with ones to YouTube, added references containing links to Daniela's personal webpage, to Routledge's page advertising her book, plus internal links to other wiki pages. I'm still getting error messages, so am clearly doing something(s) wrong. Sorry to be a pest on New Years Day, but I'd appreciate some pointers to where exactly I'm going wrong. all best wishes for the New Year, Peter

I declined your submission again because this still contains interviews and other unreliable sources. If you want more help, stop by at the teahouse and ask a question. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Labdoo article

Hello KGirlTrucker81,

thank you for your help on the Labdoo article. I don't understand why you deleted the "How it works part". Although the title may not be very good, this part did explain what Labdoo is about and how the labdoo donation, sanitizing process works.

" 20:13, 31 December 2016‎ KGirlTrucker81 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (8,767 bytes) (-4,322)‎ . . (WP:NOTHOWTO) (undo | thank)"

Could you please explain why you deleted it?

Thanks

Best Regards and a happy new year. --AoifeJB (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the edit summary, this is NOT content(the one I put the link in) and you should be able to click the link for the reason why I deleted this. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLP PROD on Erasma Arellano

I've undone your placement of a WP:BLPROD on Erasma Arellano. The article had a reference - it may not have been an inline link, but it had a section marked "Reference" that list the title, publishing year, and publisher for a book. If you have checked that book and found that it has no reference to the subject of the article, let me know and I'll restore the PROD. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NatGertler: The article is now at AFD after you removed the BLPPORD. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So I see. Did you actually read the article that you've repeatedly try to have deleted? Because half of it is a Reference section, which shows you a source. You don't seem to have done WP:BEFORE, as a Google search would've shown you that the subject is a medal-winner. Then you mark it for deletion discussion as if they were an actor or filmmaker, rather than an athlete. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NatGertler: I searched it on Google, and no independent third party sources are present. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 07:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Your Google didn't find him mentioned in lists of medalists at the 1958 Asian Games? Because mine did. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NatGertler: Yep, sup of the mouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 07:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Barkworth

Hello, I just created Mary Barkworth. I'm sorry, but this is the best I can do given the limited sources available on the internet. I think the information from the linkedIn page is why you posted the unreliable template. I think the information there is rather harmless and was created by ms. Barkworth herself. If you want to delete the article, please be my guest. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had this article quickly removed now. Thank you for your valuable contibution. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:42:35, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Peononon



Peononon (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear KGirlTrucker81, I added references for the submission, which should resolve the issue. Basil McGuckin was my Grandfather, though he died 14 years before I was born. It seemed that he was one of the few Members of the second Northern Ireland Parliament that had now follow-up information. So I wanted to add some.

Now, feel free to resubmit for re-review. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:16:18, 4 January 2017 review of submission by 192.180.232.238


Hi there. After multiple attempts to submit Elgin's page for acceptance I've continued to be declined due to the references used - when clearly he's a notable person within not only his industry of hair, but entertainment as well. What can I do to ensure this will eventually be approved? I understand some of the references are name drops (used to verify details mentioned in the text), but they seem noteworthy and to be from credible sources. Individuals and entities accosted with (including those who have studied under Elgin) have wikipedia pages, yet he can't seem to get one! Any of your help would be greatly appreciated.

Please read the golden rule. If you want more help, stop by at the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

there seem to be some persistent ones encountered

Not sure that they are reading messages, deliberately ignoring or what... creating one liner blps with links only but no refs... gah JarrahTree 13:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is an sock of TBoz2011 which I filed an SPI report on that one. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
actually I think its the same every day - thanks for your reply - cheers JarrahTree 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My recents

Think it should speak for itself - leave it to your judgement JarrahTree 15:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah. :/ KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
oops, I know I can be allusive and obscure (there is even a user who encountered me and has a banner on her/hist/whatever dontlike obscurantism heheh my fame to claim) I meant [1] JarrahTree 15:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
quack quackquack - level of claim - level of english usage - quack quack quack - JarrahTree 15:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the username is not an policy violation, but in doubt consider filing a report at WP:COIN. :) hehe ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
your chuckle - I dont believe the ed is anything but a blockable troll... JarrahTree 16:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
BLOCKED told you so JarrahTree 16:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it's an obovious troll. Now blocked as an sock. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deal or No Deal merge

Hi,

You added a merge template to this article but when I click on "Discuss" there is no merge discussion taking place? And indeed the talk page that you link to hasn't been edited between December 2013 and January this year. Have you started a merge discussion elsewhere?--5 albert square (talk) 13:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't, probably I tagged it while NPPing. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you still wish for a merge discussion to take place? Or can the template be removed?--5 albert square (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I still want a merge discussion to take place. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK started :)--5 albert square (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting Sayyed Ziya -> Zia'eddin Tabatabaee

I'm the person requesting the redirect (not at home, ergo IP). The source is Ervand Abrahamian, "the coup" (I also edited the page in question with that source). I verified the history of the person, and it is the same person. The "sayyed" is missing on the english page, but it's on the German and Spanish pages. There seems to be a million different ways to romanize Persian names; my philosophy is to catch them all. I'm a wikipedia newbie, so I don't know if this talk page is the relevant place to write this. Uglemat (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide sources other than wikipedia itself? Otherwise, it's an unlikely search term. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just did. "The Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations" is a book, written by Ervand Abrahamian, and he uses that name, in full, 4 times on page 36 alone, and many other times in the book. Uglemat (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the redirect has been created. Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VietnameseYoungling

So...what does "Per below" mean? I'm sorry if I bothered you, I'm terribly young and new. VietnameseYoungling (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The previous decline reason stated in your AFC submission. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mayestron rapper

Hello

I've just created a page and you declined it please would you mind to remove it for me please here is the page i've created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mayestron_(rapper) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuffyClarke (talkcontribs) 17:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin and I'm unable to delete pages. You can tag WP:G7 for the admins to delete it for you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me out

I don't mean to delete it, I wanna make page for an artist and I already make one but it still declined all the time, Here is the link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mayestron_(rapper) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuffyClarke (talkcontribs) 21:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DuffyClarke: Hey, I noticed you've asked the same questions with KylieTastic and also on IRC. Please don't canvass our editors who are unrelated – take a chance to review the pages we linked to on your talk page, and please let me know if you have further questions. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me out Please

Of course I need help plz coz I don't want my first page to be deleted that I created and that why I still claiming it, plz do not delete it I won't create another one without any permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuffyClarke (talkcontribs) 21:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at my previous response for the same reason. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04:10:26, 12 January 2017 review of submission by 38.75.224.122



Question re your rejection of the draft of 'Tory Bruno">

mment: Specifically this is simply a business PR listing and none of it satisfies our established policies; there's

no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else


Not following your logic. This person leads the World's largest and most prolific space launch company. He is one of the best known individuals in the space industry.

A simple googling of his name yields pages and pages of news articles. Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Washington Post, CNN, CNBC, Fortune, Forbes.... etc

Please help me understand how he is not notable

I declined your submission again for unreliable sources. The comment you posted was actually SwisterTwister's which I mostly agreed with the comment. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The tone of your NAC of Tennisuser123's ORCP was uncalled for. As none of us know what the future may hold for them in an RFA, statements like "Frankly, you have no chance of passing an RFA" are inappropriate and are a violation of AGF. If you'll notice, everyone else was saying they may well stand a chance in the foreseeable future. I'd change the wording if I were you. Thanks, Patient Zerotalk 12:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then, please feel free to revert my closure and then you close it with a good tone. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if you don't mind me doing so. Patient Zerotalk 12:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:41:34, 14 January 2017 review of submission by Rohollamahdavi



Hi, and thank you for your help but my reference was FDA and I think this topic is very fascinating because it can be useful for every person who works in pharmaceutical industry. thank you again

Your draft still has no references, if you need help on referencing, see WP:Referencing for beginners or stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you rightly rejected this draft a couple of weeks ago. A similar page was created in mainspace at List of Indycar broadcasters within minutes of the draft being started. However, the creator has seemingly ignored the article until today when he copied the content of the draft to the page (no attribution). By way of background, this is a long-term IP-hopping editor well-known to the Wiki Formula One project (and other motorsport projects) who also edits as 'Rowde'. He makes a habit of this sort of thing (amongst other "Wiki-sins'); creating both pages and drafts/userpages for topics which probably won't be accepted. Anyway, I was wondering about the best way to deal with this particular instance? Thanks for any suggestions. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe PROD this article? This is still NOTDIRECTORY. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I see you've already done so. Eagleash (talk) 16:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok

you live in a country where gender, humanity and a few other things are being reversed in a few days, but not too sure where you get the 'she' from JarrahTree 03:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly don't know! :) I use random gender identity stuff lol. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rick James

You should read what someone writes before engaging in petty reversions. I was posting a relevant query about the bloody article, that you twice sniped. Enjoy your fiefdom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.69.15.196 (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, your comments violated WP:NOTFORUM. Talk pages are for discussing improvements not for general discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
KGirl, not really. The article showed some random name that an IP had changed it to. This IP was just trying to sort it out. Primefac (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

02:04:27, 16 January 2017 review of submission by FogrolirGrumbane


I'm not requesting a re-review, just want to ask an honest question for a better guideline for redoing the references etc...

It says to list verifiable information, and while I realize a lot of it is from the authors website directly, several references are from the authors pages from amazon, good reads etc. I am not sure what would be considered verifiable as the author has stated on his official facebook page several tikes that he generally does not do interviews for sites or give out much personal information. If I go to the poetry websites and link the book compilations of his poetry would that help? His personal information would rely solely on his website, unless I pulled his public record to verify things such as his being arrested and such.

Just looking for clarification, as to me personally, you cant get more verifiable than from the persons website itself. Though I did also link an outside website that did a profile on him from the United Kingdom.

Sorry this is so long! Just want to see if linking the compilation books would help, or if it is more his personal info that is the issue. Thanks guys!

FogrolirGrumbane (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PRs and soical media are not reliable sources. You need sources that are reilable and independent of each topic such as major news or book reviews. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lanka Air Force Women related article

@KGirlTrucker, I am not being able to find any more reference regarding Sri Lanka Air Force Women's Wing, you may consider deleting that.Katree en vasal (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, and I'm unable to delete pages. You can tag CSD G7 to let the admins delete it for you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MoonMail deletion suggestion

Is there anything we can make to get MoonMail article published? What was wrong in the article so I can help fix it? Alexandresaiz (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC) alexandresaiz[reply]

The article only has one reference to a blog which is not reilable sources. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

01:47:53, 18 January 2017 review of submission by BenHirons


Hello,

You recently reviewed and declined the submission of my page 'Smartpay'. I was just wondering why the referencing does not show the subject's notability as I've looked over them and believe that they adequately support the notability of the material on the page. If there is anything specific that I am missing please let me know so I can further improve this page.

Thanks for your help, Felicity

It needs independent third-party sources to help establish notability such as in-depth news sources. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kendall Vertes

Just an FYI the page has been repeatedly recreated (and subsequently deleted) and this user tries to get it through by using the name + an entirely different article (see most recent edits.) Not sure what they're trying to accomplish here though. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chrissymad, that may be true, but there was content added shortly after the A3 tag was added, making that CSD invalid. A7/PROD/AFD might still be applicable, however. Primefac (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
@Primefac: Oh I agree - I just meant it as a heads up. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined redirect request: Donald Trump moth → Neopalpa donaldtrumpi

Here's a few examples of Neopalpa donaldtrumpi, a newly named species of moth, being referred to as the Donald Trump moth:

Donald Trump Moth Namesake Has Tousled Mop of Blonde Hair[1]
Donald Trump moth with 'blonde hairdo' becomes internet sensation[2]
Donald Trump Moth: New Species Of Moth With Weird Hair Named After Trump[3]
New ‘Donald Trump Moth’ Has Golden Hair And Tiny Genitals[4]
Donald Trump Moth Discovered… On the Mexican Border[5]
Donald Trump Moth Inspired by Yellow Head, Increasing Conservation Awareness[6]
Donald Trump Moth | The Asian Age[7]
Donald Trump Moth | Deccan Chronicle[8]
Donald Trump Moth An Honor Turning Into Insult? Insect Named For Trump[9]
Donald Trump Moth: New Species Of Moth With Weird Hair Named After Trump[10]
Now There’s a Donald Trump Moth[11]

File:Donald Trump President-elect portrait (cropped).jpg← Twins? →

It's looking likely that Donald Trump moth will become increasingly used as a synonym for Neopalpa donaldtrumpi as the moth becomes well known because of who it's named after and its very close resemblance to him. Undeclining the declined redirect request will be helpful to people who only know of Neopalpa donaldtrumpi as the Donald Trump moth, enabling instant navigation to the article for this important species of moth.

78.146.172.211 (talk) 01:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

OK, the redirect has now been created, thanks for your contribution! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks. DavidPatBoyle (talk) 20:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nah

not into instant portals - shipwrecks and Australian maritime history dont have them yet, and dont want no artificial crap - I want a real smiling wreck for a proper portal and link - cheers - etc JarrahTree 13:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's an {{Portal|Australia}} if there's nothing fit in this portal category. (If it's obvious hehehe) :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
dangerous territory - obviousness - down a very strange rabbit hole in quantum physics for a start - JarrahTree 14:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hahahaha LOL :D KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
LOL indeed you have someone in your country going down an even odder hole, lewis carroll would have been impressed, but the rabbits would be horrified I suspect JarrahTree 14:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hehehe *Me giving JT a hug so funly* even the rabbits were on the road from Interstate 66! :D KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah well, not sure about the rabbits, even the Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan had a thing about the ole 66... JarrahTree 15:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I randomly sure there are here. ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
beware - not a very long lecture about gender identification - many Indonesian speakers have problems remembering whether in english the person is male or female - as in their native language bahasa indonesia dia does not have a marker for gender - I am a grandfather - does that give you a clue? JarrahTree 13:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, but I still randomly call any gender identity. hehehehe lol :D KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
red-outlined triangle containing exclamation point Warning: She can get very sarcastic easily if you randomly chat with her. hehehe ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:04:37, 24 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Gladyschoy225


Hi,

I would like to ask for your advice to improve my article on Vision for a Nation Foundation. Can you provide some guidance please?

Gladyschoy225 (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the golden rule. If you want more help, stop by at the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 07:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFC/R declines

I've noticed a good number of outright bad declines at AFC/R. Examples:

All of these are at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects/2017-01. Without very good reason, declining such candidates is disruptive. Would you mind explaining carefully your very good reasons for declaring all of these bad redirects? Nyttend (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They need to provide sources or I'll do a normal Google search to see if it's plausible search term. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Let me be clear: you have been badly disrupting the AFC/R process (among other things, rejecting AFC/R requests for blatantly bad reasons is a good example of WP:BITE), and your response here makes it seem as if you don't understand or don't care. If I see additional disruption in this manner, you will be blocked. Nyttend (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll review the polices you explained here. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:54:36, 30 January 2017 review of submission by Countach1017


Can you please re-read my page I made?

I declined your submission again because it doesn't have references and you've used Wikipedia as a reference. If you need help on referencing see WP:Referencing for beginners or stop by at the WP:Teahouse. Template:Sign1 KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:15:11, 31 January 2017 review of submission by BenHirons



Hello,

You recently declined my article called 'Smartpay' because it does not adequately show the subject's notability, however I believe that I have provided significant evidence that show the subject's notability. All the sources I have used are from a notable third-party website and not Smartpay's own website and I have included them wherever necessary. Could you please explain how I could provide further evidence of the subject's notability as I thought I had already done so.

Thanks, Ben

Fell free to resubmit your draft if provided the sources. It needs major news reviews. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:15:41, 31 January 2017 review of submission by AllyMP17



Please explain to me how to cite the information that I received by in person interviews. My last paragraph has the link to the website and stated where the information was from.



There are thousands of businesses with wikipedia pages. I in no way marketed anything in my article. I simply provided basic information on the company and it's founders.

Examples of business wikipedia pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald's

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_%26_Morgan_PA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Astaire_Dance_Studios

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walmart


If there is something wrong with my article, please give me a specific example instead of just saying wikipedia isn't for business listings. Because that isn't really true considered the thousands of businesses with wikipedia pages.

Those are notable businesses and yours is not yet until there's significant coverage in reliable sources. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs and AfD

I have transcluded Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahar Ghoreishi in the lists Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Iran. While WP:IRAN isn't terribly active, WP:WOMEN is, and in any case I think it is important that both WikiProjects are informed about the discussion, so we at least try to reduce gender- and geo-bias. AfD discussions that falls into CAT:AFD/B are almost always sorted into at least one geographical list apart from topical lists. WP:DELSORT/FLAT comes in handy.

Speaking from my own experience, tagging articles for deletion - except maybe for those cases that are very clearly eligible for deletion under one of our strict criteria for speedy deletion - without performing a search for sources is a bad habit. For some "good" examples, check out the blue-linked titles in this log file, and in the archives of that log file, and the red fields here. Yes, {{facepalm}} applies, that's for sure. The mantra I keep repeating to myself these days is "Do your WP:BEFORE, Sam, and consider WP:ATD before tagging for deletion", and I believe this credo at least has reduced my share of inept tags.

In this diff you tagged Kireeti Damaraju with {{citation style}}, {{unreliable sources}}, and {{lead missing}}, and two-and-a-half minutes later in this diff you proposed Sahar Ghoreishi be uncontroversially deleted, and gave the short rationale Fails NACTOR. If we are to believe the two articles prima facie, then Damaraju has four roles to his credit, none of them starring AFAICT, in the last four years, whereas Ghoreishi has 38 roles on her CV in the last 7–8 years. Twenty-nine of these productions are blue-linked in her article on Farsi Wikipedia. On English Wikipedia we have at least Guidance Patrol?! where the infobox lists her as starring. So, the BLP with the shortest career and the fewest credits of the two you slap maintenance templates on, and the BLP with ~twice as long a career and ~9 times as many roles you PRODNOM? Could you tell me where the logic is?

I get 90.000+ Ghits on Template:Boldmono and I get 500.000+ Ghits on Template:Boldmono. Numbers like these in my experience shout WP:NPOSSIBLE and tells me to look more carefully to see if I can find reliable sources with significant coverage. A more narrow search using the intitle: parametre reveals that there are currently 200+ Gnews hits on her Farsi name. In the title. A straight Gnews search returns 160.000+ hits. This is in my opinion not a PROD case. I am aware of WP:MUSTBESOURCES and WP:GHITS, which is why I have commented at AfD rather than casting a !vote, but I regard your deletion rationale as a WP:VAGUEWAVE argument. Assuming that your "PROD stands" and that you speak Farsi - I have no idea how anyone would think they reasonably could pass a judgement on a subject about which the majority of the sources are in a language they do not speak, although I have once heard the baffling argument made at an AfD discussion that a PROD nominator upheld his "delete" !vote and discounted French language sources because he did not read French - could you please return to AfD and help me understand why none of the sources are useful? Should you upon further consideration and vetting of the available sources have a change of heart and a wish to withdraw the nomination, the instructions found at WP:WDAFD may be followed. Regards, — Sam Sailor 18:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC) P.S. You have an unclosed <big> tag in your editnotice.[reply]

I naively speak english, but fair enough, I have done WP:BEFORE searches before nominating anything for deletion. Thanks for the advice. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption request

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
KGirlTrucker81 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Emmafuent". The reason given for Emmafuent's block is: "vandalism, see also edit filter log". Was currently editing on a school IP and autoblocked me! *sigh* :/


Accept reason: I lifted the autoblock. I believe you may qualify for IP block exemption but am looking into this further. Yamla (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:IPBE doesn't make it particularly clear what the steps are to grant an IP block exemption. As such, I'm going to suggest you file a request with WP:UTRS. You are welcome to state in your request that I believe you are a good candidate for IPBE. I'm not granting it myself because I'm not sure if it is necessary, and I'm not sure if I'd be overreaching. But I believe you are a good candidate for it. --Yamla (talk) 19:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This requires email because I don't have email enabled due to my access to personal information. Cheers! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darcey Leeney

Hi. I deleted it again because it reads like an attack page to me. Deb (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah well, I didn't see the negative language in the article. :/ KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 21:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello KGirlTrucker81,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18:52:19, 5 February 2017 review of submission by 96.224.3.222



How do we add sources?

See WP:Referencing for beginners if you need help on referencing. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:55, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11:31:08, 6 February 2017 review of submission by James153 0000


You've rejected my draft because of insufficient references. The issue with that is I was writing about myself so I don't think I need to explain to anyone where I get information about myself. Please reconsider, okay...

Please read the golden rule. If you want more help, stop by at the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:57:41, 7 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by MelodyCS


Hi there. You state the Melody Composer Squared page needs "Major app reviews" before it is approved. Where should I post links to these? Do I need to link them within the content somehow? How many should I post?

Thank you kindly.

MelodyCS (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It needs independent third party in-depth sources as I previously said. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paid parking has been nominated for discussion

Category:Paid parking, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Toohool (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible redirect page creation mistake

Hello,

On 11:33, 28 January 2017‎, you had created a redirect page called Time Spike, The Alexander Inheritance in addition to separate redirect pages for Time Spike and The Alexander Inheritance. Was the creation of Time Spike, The Alexander Inheritance redirect page just the result of a simple typing mistake? Thought you might want to know since your work is usually great and under appreciated. –cheers 68.45.25.137 (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm Facepalm : Sorry, I forgot to click the "more" option when I'm using the PhatomTech AFC/R HS. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mistakes do happens from time to time (especially when some tools could use a better designed GUI). No major damage done. However, there is now an extra redirect page that perform no real function except looks really strange when someone bothers to use the "what links here" feature and look at the list of redirects for a particular page. If you are able to delete the "extra" page, that would help tidy things up. Thanks. -68.45.25.137 (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Why did you undo my edit to the Abington Senior High page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.243.209 (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see your talk page for the explanation. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
KGirlTrucker81 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "DabonDIck". The reason given for DabonDIck's block is: "Vandalism-only account". Was autoblocked again from a school IP. :/


Accept reason: Editor in good standing. Yamla (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Yamla (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

help with LIBRARY OF SANDS band page

UNCUT music magazine has links to prove the band is a band. The website has a press kit with public appearance listed. We seek help as we didn't join wiki to Edit. Musicbyshineywater (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to WP:AFC/R was an test. If you want to create an article, I recommend that you use the article wizard and submitting your draft for review. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Information icon I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh for a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MPS1992: You've actually templated me, and I'm trying to not bite the newbie. Can you copy-paste this to the bottom for me? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have actually templated you because it was necessary. Are you OK?
Please explain exactly what I need to copy-paste, and from where and to where I need to copy-paste it, to assist with whatever problem you are having.
Many thanks. MPS1992 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MPS1992: Nope, it irritates me to read the policies again. Please check the revision history and check the diff were the newbie posted it, and paste it on the bottom of this page. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, if you wish never to be templated, you will need to read policies -- perhaps more than once -- and also you will need to learn what consensus means. If you wish to keep your privileges, you will need to learn what it means to be part of a community. MPS1992 (talk) 23:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10:38:40, 12 February 2017 review of submission by Var4796


Hi sir,i want you to re-review the article because this artist is capable to be on wikipedia,i am his die-hard fan and he has thousands of followers,i have inserted some references his facebook page,his fans page and movies youtube link which he has composed music.thank you.

Unfortunately, those are not reliable sources for the reason I have to decline your submission again. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:02:22, 13 February 2017 review of submission by MelodyCS


Hi there. I'm writing/editing the Melody Composer Squared page, which was rejected by you for lack of sources last week. I have added app review references to the page. Can you please tell me if I"m on the right path to getting this page approved? If not, what am I doing wrong? Thank you kindly! Melody Editor (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to resubmit this draft when you resolved the issues. It still needs independent third party sources. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23:30:38, 15 February 2017 review of submission by Ted.archeologia



Hey Trucker, Thanks for your help in making my page super-awesome. Not really requesting a re-review yet as I've only added six references so far, and the person I'm writing about has lots of theatre roles and stuff that I ought to add. Just wanna know which sort of references you prefer - which references are super trust-worthy or whatever. Should the references all just appear at the bottom of the page or do you want some halfway through the text? Another Wiki page that needs some reviewing (about a subject I work on) is the page on the Roman Aqueduct called the "Aqua Traiana" - perhaps you can help kill the nonsense in that page so it can be sorted out. I discovered part of that aqueduct [1] so I sort of feel it's my duty to improve the truly aweful Wiki page. Let me know, Ted O'Neill

Ted.archeologia (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It needs independent third party reliable sources. Currently, your references to the draft doesn't seem reliable. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 07:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wash your keyboard

stalking with sprays like that you might catch something very very very nasty [2] on with the gloves, and the triple strength face mask, and safety glasses, and step back slowly you never know where the horse might have been JarrahTree 14:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hehehe very funny, but the horse is on the road on Interstate 59 in Alabama. I'm a talk stalker who gets very sarcastic lol :D KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
not funny for the millions of potential deaths - maybe sarcasm on the interstate will take you into the road to nowhere.JarrahTree 22:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
*Me and JT giving at pat on the back and huging so funly!* Yeah, death and violence is not funny at all. Probably sure that driving on Interstate Highways can be fun while sarcasm can take me out of the road hehe ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 00:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ustinov Artur

Good afternoon! On what basis is blocked article Ustinov Artur? You make mistakes. If you continue to do this action, I will complain of you. This is a decent man. Anastasia Sanders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.162.65.42 (talk) 06:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article is at AFD, so feel free to participate in the deletion debate. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I completely agree with the previous speaker. Why do you make artificial problems for publication? I do not understand it. For all your discontent you've already got the answer. Pierre Rui

See WP:Articles for deletion/Artur Ustinov for the reasoning why the article should be deleted. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article should not be deleted. You are making a mistake. And you violate the principles of Wikipedia is free information. Any person should have the right to see the information, and you do invented obstacles. Sting Loure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.220.43.73 (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, please read our basic policies and guidelines including WP:RS, WP:N, WP:V, and perhaps a read of WP:CIVIL since your comments are a bit incivil. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, just no

You shouldn't have bent to this [3]. -- WV 16:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I should've declined the move request. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. -- WV 22:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06:44:09, 21 February 2017 review of submission by ANIRBANB724


Hello KGirlTrucker81, this is ANIRBANB724. I am very new to writing articles on wiki. I created an article on Calcutta Social Project which on initial draft missed out references. Based on your comments, I have now included all the references which I used to create the same. Calcutta Social Project is a NGO based out of Kolkata, India. I do understand that there is a huge backlog but would truly appreciate your help in re-reviewing the article and approving it for publishing.

Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. I apologize for bothering you but would appreciate your guidance and help.

This basically needs more references but I'll defer to another AFC reviewer because it's borderlined accepting and nearly declining the submission. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 06:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


@KGirlTrucker81: KGirlTrucker81, just checking if you were able to defer it to another AFC for review. Also, please note that I added few more references to the article. Would appreciate your help and approving the article.

I declined the submission again because it has one reference to a unreliable source. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KGirlTrucker81: I have now removed Facebook reference. Would appreciate if you re-review and approve the same.

@SwisterTwister: Hello SwisterTwister, KGirlTrucker81 wanted me to ping you to come and take a look at this article. Can you please review and approve the same.

Thank you to both of you.

Request on 15:09:45, 21 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Hugo Timmis


My page has recently been declined due to lack of references. I was wondering how I could reference my page better, such as photos, property papers etc?

Hugo Timmis (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It needs independent third party reliable sources such as major news reviews. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello KGirlTrucker81,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18:57:35, 22 February 2017 review of submission by Aberry50


The biography page I submitted for Marnix Koumans is clearly sourced by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency webpage. I'm a little confused.

Currently, your draft has only have one source which don't establish notability. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 21:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noice

Hey, I saw you on a Speedy Deletion Post then checked out your user page, was wondering if you could mentor me on all things Wikipedian. Can you? Aaryan33056 (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC) PS: there's a spelling error on this big notice you have. Pls fix I have Grammar Police issues.[reply]

You could get adopted by a experienced editor to mentor you about the basics of Wikipedia. Anyway, I'll take a look at my editnotice at my userpage. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noice, I think this is fixed!

Stop Everyone just stop here before leaving a message! Stop

If my talk page is protected due a vandal attack or something, I have my alt talk page just in case. I'll pefer discussions unfragmented but please talk to me here if my main talk is unprotected. Please sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end of your message (MPS1992 (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)). Being rude to me will take you into the road to nowhere.[reply]

The above is the additional text due to the current user. Why is it necessary?

Personally, I find it rather strange. Perhaps we could fix it? MPS1992 (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can if you want to! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parra fiction

I have tagged Parra fiction with {{db-madeup}}. I don't know what was "slightly promotional" about it. — Sam Sailor 02:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Slightly promotional" means there's a litte peacocky language in the article. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Such as? — Sam Sailor 02:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Those words highlighted in red: "tells us" "God gave us" are examples of the pecocky language. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, "tells us" and "God Gave us" are not peacock terms. And in Parra fiction, the text string "God Gave us" is not even found. — Sam Sailor 03:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I still suspect it's promotional and it's written like The Bible. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new selection

Hi my name is Romeo Brown, first i wanna thank you for looking my draft up..am new here and i want to be part of wikipedia contributors but its hard for me to attach my ref in a standard way. The artist am writing about is notable and well known for his song igebulikwe and other songs,,so please how do i attach my ref? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romeobrown (talkcontribs) 17:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the Referencing for beignners tutorial if you help on referencing. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Codedruns

Please can i retrieve my codedruns article you deleted ? Jeffsnorth (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :( I'm not an admin and the article doesn't meet inclusion guidelines as well. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeffsnorth: You would have to contact the administrator that deleted the page, which is User:Ritchie333. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 21:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC) (talk page watcher)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Eisenberg

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesse Eisenberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MatthewHoobin -- MatthewHoobin (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:00:41, 2 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Zell01


Hi KGirlTrucker81, I'm writing you about my rejected article on the card game Jewels. The reason for rejection was lack of reliable sources, so I was wondering if adding a section called "Reception and critics" would help? There I could write about the reviews the game has received, and add the sources.

I think the game deserve to be included here since it managed to successfully complete a kickstarter campaign, and to create a small player audience. The game can't be purchased new at the moment, so I'm not trying to promote it or anything like that (in fact I'm not associated or connected to them). I just think that's a small gem (no pun intended :D), and deserves to be remembered/listed among the notable card games since it received positive reviews and has a score of 7.1 on Board Game Geek out of 65 ratings.

If you have any tips on any other way to improve the article, please let me know.

Thanks, Zell01 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Zell01Zell01 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zell01 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the golden rule. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:05:25, 2 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Credoxtalkies


Dear Mam, I had added the citation. Is it correct now? I was new to Wiki's that's why I missed to add citation. Thanks & Regards, Credox Talkies

Credoxtalkies (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your references you added has unreliable sources. Please read WP:Your first article before making further improvements. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added Citations

Hey, thanks for helping me to improve the page: Craig McGuffie. I'm still very new to Wikipedia (only joined yesterday)! Since you left the notice about the article relying on only one citation, I've added many more sections and citations. Would it be ok to remove the notice now? Maesterial (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you should removed the tag itself. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox deleted

methinks copyright infridgement nonappilcable. i am the owner of contents kickstarter, account just deleted, blog is kept alive by kickstarters. same content is on wordpress, indiagogo, amazon.com. truly sorry to have broken wiki rules. newbie will behave. Poggio Bracciolini (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid decentralized discussion I'll be responding on Poggio's page. Primefac (talk) 12:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Appreciate your assistance. Muzr1009 (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Singh -- Wheat Breeder listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ravi Singh -- Wheat Breeder. Since you had some involvement with the Ravi Singh -- Wheat Breeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 00:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hasty A7 tagging

At Hamza Laalioui; three minutes after creation. More haste less speed, eh. Sorry to have to post here. Take care, — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 12:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus strictly applies to A1 and A3 only, and I think you're incorrect about it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-review page - all concerns taken care of

My colleague created a page with some mistakes - [[Draft:SAP_Web_IDE]]. I (195.93.234.8 (talk) 06:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)) have taken care of all the concerns -- notability, sourcing -- and believe it is ready to be released. It is as sourced and notable as hundreds of already approved Wikipedia pages on similar subjects. Can you re-review the page? If OK, should I remove the warnings? Thanks for reviewing in the first place.[reply]