User talk:Pnick ramirez2097/sandbox: Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Peer Edit Comments |
Peer Edit Comments |
||
{{ping|Pnick ramirez2097}} Hey Nick! Just a couple of quick comments here. I believe that you could have done a bit better on the edit front, there seems to be some information missing from the draft. You can definitely add a works section towards the end perhaps in table form with a brief explanation of each work, if that's what you were planning on doing before- remember, you want people to be able to find information quickly and not have to really dig for it. I like that you've started formatting your headers, but it would be so much better to do just a bit more research before delving into the article. So far, ok. Good luck and have a good time writing! [[User:DDenord|DDenord]] ([[User talk:DDenord|talk]]) 01:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
{{ping|Pnick ramirez2097}} Hey Nick! Just a couple of quick comments here. I believe that you could have done a bit better on the edit front, there seems to be some information missing from the draft. You can definitely add a works section towards the end perhaps in table form with a brief explanation of each work, if that's what you were planning on doing before- remember, you want people to be able to find information quickly and not have to really dig for it. I like that you've started formatting your headers, but it would be so much better to do just a bit more research before delving into the article. So far, ok. Good luck and have a good time writing! [[User:DDenord|DDenord]] ([[User talk:DDenord|talk]]) 01:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
: {{ping|DDenord}} Thanks for the review! That was what I was planning on doing before, I was planning on making various subsections in the other works section where I would put brief summaries of each work as opposed to creating new pages for each one of them. Also I'm currently in the process of finding more research regarding the abolition and women's rights sections I have set up and I'm close to being able to start working on them to a full capacity. [[User:Pnick ramirez2097|Pnick ramirez2097]] ([[User talk:Pnick ramirez2097|talk]]) 04:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:34, 6 March 2017
Prof Garcia's Comments
Week 2
Nicholas: please take more time to do your assignments in the future. Your answers on the content gap were meager and unacceptable. You need to write MUCH more than that in order to pass the assignments. Your analysis of Animism, moreover, was insufficient. You did not put in any real effort into this assignment, unfortunately, and it shows. Alfgarciamora (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Week 6
Peer Edit Comments @Pnick ramirez2097: Hey Nick! Just a couple of quick comments here. I believe that you could have done a bit better on the edit front, there seems to be some information missing from the draft. You can definitely add a works section towards the end perhaps in table form with a brief explanation of each work, if that's what you were planning on doing before- remember, you want people to be able to find information quickly and not have to really dig for it. I like that you've started formatting your headers, but it would be so much better to do just a bit more research before delving into the article. So far, ok. Good luck and have a good time writing! DDenord (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- @DDenord: Thanks for the review! That was what I was planning on doing before, I was planning on making various subsections in the other works section where I would put brief summaries of each work as opposed to creating new pages for each one of them. Also I'm currently in the process of finding more research regarding the abolition and women's rights sections I have set up and I'm close to being able to start working on them to a full capacity. Pnick ramirez2097 (talk) 04:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)