Conformism: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m Robot-assisted fixing links to disambiguation page (you can help!) Conservative |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
One manifestation of conformism emerges in the practice of "going along and getting along" with people who appear to be more [[power (sociology) | powerful]]. Conformism holds that individuals and small groups do best by blending in with their surroundings and by doing nothing [[eccentricity (behaviour)|eccentric]] or out-of-the-ordinary in any way. |
One manifestation of conformism emerges in the practice of "going along and getting along" with people who appear to be more [[power (sociology) | powerful]]. Conformism holds that individuals and small groups do best by blending in with their surroundings and by doing nothing [[eccentricity (behaviour)|eccentric]] or out-of-the-ordinary in any way. |
||
By definition, conformism presents the [[antithesis]] both of [[creativity]] and of [[innovation | innovative]] [[leadership]], and hence opposes [[change]] and/or [[wikt:Progress|progress]] itself. [[Authoritarian]] [[institution]]s (such as [[military]] organizations and organized [[religion]]s) tend to glorify and reinforce conformism within their ranks, as do many large [[corporations]]. Their influence has both [[subconscious]] and overt aspects. Typically, those calling for conformism and for obedience to [[authority]] couch their demands in [[conservative]] terms to give the impression that they aim towards the preservation of the ''[[status quo]]'', which critics often say can mask power-grabs and the exercise of self-interest. |
By definition, conformism presents the [[antithesis]] both of [[creativity]] and of [[innovation | innovative]] [[leadership]], and hence opposes [[change]] and/or [[wikt:Progress|progress]] itself. [[Authoritarian]] [[institution]]s (such as [[military]] organizations and organized [[religion]]s) tend to glorify and reinforce conformism within their ranks, as do many large [[corporations]]. Their influence has both [[subconscious]] and overt aspects. Typically, those calling for conformism and for obedience to [[authority]] couch their demands in [[Conservatism|conservative]] terms to give the impression that they aim towards the preservation of the ''[[status quo]]'', which critics often say can mask power-grabs and the exercise of self-interest. |
||
One view of innovation stresses the importance of outward or grand-scale conformism. Since open and extreme [[rebel]]s get incarcerated, according to this theory, effective change may require minor, incremental acts of a non-conforming nature. |
One view of innovation stresses the importance of outward or grand-scale conformism. Since open and extreme [[rebel]]s get incarcerated, according to this theory, effective change may require minor, incremental acts of a non-conforming nature. |
||
Revision as of 13:16, 21 September 2006
Conformism is a term used to describe the suspension of an individual's self-determined actions or opinions in favor of obedience to the mandates or conventions of one's peer-group, or deference to the imposed norms of a supervening authority.
One manifestation of conformism emerges in the practice of "going along and getting along" with people who appear to be more powerful. Conformism holds that individuals and small groups do best by blending in with their surroundings and by doing nothing eccentric or out-of-the-ordinary in any way.
By definition, conformism presents the antithesis both of creativity and of innovative leadership, and hence opposes change and/or progress itself. Authoritarian institutions (such as military organizations and organized religions) tend to glorify and reinforce conformism within their ranks, as do many large corporations. Their influence has both subconscious and overt aspects. Typically, those calling for conformism and for obedience to authority couch their demands in conservative terms to give the impression that they aim towards the preservation of the status quo, which critics often say can mask power-grabs and the exercise of self-interest.
One view of innovation stresses the importance of outward or grand-scale conformism. Since open and extreme rebels get incarcerated, according to this theory, effective change may require minor, incremental acts of a non-conforming nature.