Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions
Cyberbot I (talk | contribs) Bot clerking, archiving 3 threads, 1 pending request remains. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
→Zoey Tur: add Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – Continual violations of [[WP:MOSIDENTITY]] by IPs and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Zoey_Tur&curid=3092322&diff=770462441&oldid=769998783 newly created accounts]. [[User:Roberticus|<span style="font-family:'Century Gothic',serif;color:black">'''Roberticus'''</span>]] [[User talk:Roberticus|<span style="font-family:'Century Gothic',serif;color:blue">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 16:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – Continual violations of [[WP:MOSIDENTITY]] by IPs and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Zoey_Tur&curid=3092322&diff=770462441&oldid=769998783 newly created accounts]. [[User:Roberticus|<span style="font-family:'Century Gothic',serif;color:black">'''Roberticus'''</span>]] [[User talk:Roberticus|<span style="font-family:'Century Gothic',serif;color:blue">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 16:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{RFPP|pd|1 year}} [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 16:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
:{{RFPP|pd|1 year}} [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 16:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
||
=== [[:UTC+02:30:17]] === |
|||
* {{pagelinks|UTC+02:30:17}} |
|||
'''Creation protection:''' Repeatedly deleted/recreated. Thanks --[[Special:Contributions/2607:FB90:5CE8:DE66:5DB2:40A9:A290:77CF|2607:FB90:5CE8:DE66:5DB2:40A9:A290:77CF]] ([[User talk:2607:FB90:5CE8:DE66:5DB2:40A9:A290:77CF|talk]]) 17:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Current requests for reduction in protection level == |
== Current requests for reduction in protection level == |
Revision as of 17:04, 15 March 2017
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 11:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target for dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Malicious IP vandalism by IP Address 121.54.44.184 and 121.54.44.177 . Jp2593 (talk) 12:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Glaewnis 13:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP-hopping disruptive editor that caused need for prior protection has returned. Deli nk (talk) 14:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated recreation of non n otable autobiography page. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 15:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection (and speedy if possible): Repeated re-creation under various spelling variants by socking self-promoter. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dharmendra bansal. GermanJoe (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected Also deleted and IP blocked. Lectonar (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual violations of WP:MOSIDENTITY by IPs and newly created accounts. Roberticus talk 16:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Creation protection: Repeatedly deleted/recreated. Thanks --2607:FB90:5CE8:DE66:5DB2:40A9:A290:77CF (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Remove semi-protection: Protection seems to have been placed by a WP:INVOLVED administrator (Maile66) who is abusing admin rights for his own edits, blocking discussion after previously restoring edits that are traced to a racist and non-valid source through the use of false accusations of sockpuppetry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.121.163 (talk • contribs)
- Declined. First of all, the page wasn't protected by Maile66, and it is not protected indefinitely. And secondly, I am not about to undo another admin's protection duration without a really good reason. (Even if, admittedly, my own MO is for much shorter durations.) As for accusations of "racist and non-valid source through the use of false accusations of sockpuppetry"—the proof to that convoluted and confusing claim is in the diffs, which you have failed to cite. Something dosen't feel quite right. El_C 00:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Denial by El C is a mistake for the following reasons:
- - Maile66 is WP:INVOLVED at Texas Revolution, having made numerous content edits to the page.
- - Maile66 is similarly WP:INVOLVED at talk:Texas Revolution.
- - Maile66, despite being WP:INVOLVED used admin powers to lock the talk:Texas Revolution under what appear based on the content I can see, to be false claims of bad editing.
- - Maile66 has also used his admin powers in a content dispute on talk:Texas Revolution despite being WP:INVOLVED.
- - Maile66 has demanded that "we need to hear from Karanacs on this" and is trying to use user:Karanacs's silence as a reason not to remove clearly problematic content from the article. user:Karanacs is known by Maile66 to be retired and/or otherwise inactive from the project, Karanacs having had administrative powers removed for inactivity after a full year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.121.163 (talk • contribs)
- Note: Just an observation: the talk-page was indeed protected by Maile66. But imho the underlying problem will not be solved by requests here at RfP. Lectonar (talk) 08:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: My bad, the reference indeed was to the talk page, which will be automatically unprotected in a few weeks. Apparently, it was due to abuse of multiple accounts. El_C 09:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I also decline; out of scope of WP:RFP.Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: IP blocked for block evasion. But a one month semi-protect on a talk page after one edit seems very much like overkill. Pinging Maile66 so they're aware of this discussion. NeilN talk to me 13:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.