Talk:Screaming Lord Sutch: Difference between revisions
update for workgroup and WikiProject |
remove bot assessment; agree with class |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=C |
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=C|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no |
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no |
||
|class=C |
|class=C |
Revision as of 17:54, 19 March 2017
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Died in June
Didn't he die on 16 June, not 16 April? (I did change it to 16 June, but someone changed it back without explanation.) --Zundark, 2001 Oct 30
Name
If someone got a local court to change their name legally to God, or King Frederick of Prussia, would Wikipedia be bound in some way to change our article title about them, to reflect their name change? I think not.
The only reason to use, say, an actor's stage name instead of their birth name or other common name, is if readers would be hopeless lost otherwise. We use "John Wayne" for the American film star, because nobody ever heard of Marion Morrison - the link is red here, because we never even made a redirect out of it (the redirect is from "Marion Robert Morrison", his birth name).
So i suggest moving Screaming Lord Sutch to David Edward Sutch. Uncle Ed July 9, 2005 14:16 (UTC)
According to another wikipedia article,
- The Loonies generally field as many candidates as possible in United Kingdom general elections, some (but by no means all) standing under ridiculous false names they have adopted via deed poll. Sutch himself stood against all three main party leaders (John Major, Neil Kinnock and Paddy Ashdown) in the 1992 General Election. (emphasis added for discussion)
I think this is an example of "disrupting X to make a point", where X is British society.
Should Wikipedia aid this attempt at disruption, or merely report on it? I choose the latter. Uncle Ed July 9, 2005 14:27 (UTC)
- Hmmm ... interesting question.
- Have we left enough time for discussion here?
- See, for comparison, see Lord Buckley -- a bebop-era American satirist. BrandonYusufToropov 9 July 2005 14:53 (UTC)
I've moved this back to Screaming Lord Sutch, as that was the name he was most commonly known as. Whether or what he changed his name to by deed poll, I don't care - common usage is most important. David Edward Sutch is about the worst possible location for this article. sjorford (?!) 14:10, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
My two cents: if Sutch had legally changed his name to 'God' or 'King Frederick of Prussia', and was then popularly known by that name for decades, we would put him under 'God (British musician and politician)' or 'King Frederick of Prussia (British musician and politician)'. But there is no need to put the explanatory note after "Screaming Lord Sutch", because AFAIK thereis no other notable Screaming Lord Sutch.DanielCristofani 06:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Politician?
Hmmm Is it proper to describe David as a 'polititian'? He never actually won an election and therefore never served in any formal political capacity. Would not a more correct description of his activites be 'frequent parliamentary candidate'. The Monster Raving Loony Party were not a political organisation in the normally accepted sense, it was more a collection of individuals who very much did their own thing, decided their own agendas, and operated without central party control if they were elected. 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Memoirs
So his memoirs were recalled by the publisher. Any special reason? I think it would be relevant. 86.144.199.247 (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Lordsutch01a.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Lordsutch01a.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lordsutch01a.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
Death
Seems to be wrong way about. You seem to be saying: ‘He suffered from depression, following the death of his mother in 1997, and committed suicide by hanging on 16 June 1999.’ But even then, there is no report about his relationship with his mother, to indicate why it might have provoked suicide. Valetude (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Radio articles
- Low-importance Radio articles
- UK Radio articles
- WikiProject Radio articles