User talk:Kdbuffalo

apologetics

I'd sure like to hear what you had to say about this page on the talk page. Jonathan Tweet 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked one week for continuing to disrupt and troll evolution and evolution related articles. IT has been made very clear at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kdbuffalo 2 that the community is unwilling to tolerate this behaviour. Noth of your acknowledged accounts have been blocked. pschemp | talk 19:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Your block has been restarted and now set to nine days, due to the block evasion. -- tariqabjotu 06:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Given ongoing evidence of sockpuppetry (see User:Happy Couple2) and your lengthy prior history, I've extended your block to indefinite. You may contest it by using the {{unblock}} template, or following the steps described here. MastCell ^Talk 19:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/VacuousPoet (5th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 09:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bible and Spade

I have nominated Bible and Spade, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bible and Spade. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. dougweller (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Skeptic's Annotated Bible

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The Skeptic's Annotated Bible. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Change

Hi Mr. Buffalo,

You made a change here: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Duane_Gish&diff=prev&oldid=88957990

If you don't mind, I am going to undo your change. I think that that particular trivia section adds to the article. Perhaps I'll try to incorporate it into other parts of the article. If I don't hear from you by tomorrow, I'll do it.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.86.111 (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Medicine that is harmful and ineffective listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Medicine that is harmful and ineffective. Since you had some involvement with the Medicine that is harmful and ineffective redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 07:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Request to edit Wikipedia again

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kdbuffalo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize for my previous actions and would request an unblock per WP:LASTCHANCE. I have not edited since 2005 and would like to be active on Wikipedia again. Thanks, ken (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologize for my previous actions and would request an unblock per [[WP:LASTCHANCE]]. I have not edited since 2005 and would like to be active on Wikipedia again. Thanks, [[User:Kdbuffalo|ken]] ([[User talk:Kdbuffalo#top|talk]]) 20:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize for my previous actions and would request an unblock per [[WP:LASTCHANCE]]. I have not edited since 2005 and would like to be active on Wikipedia again. Thanks, [[User:Kdbuffalo|ken]] ([[User talk:Kdbuffalo#top|talk]]) 20:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize for my previous actions and would request an unblock per [[WP:LASTCHANCE]]. I have not edited since 2005 and would like to be active on Wikipedia again. Thanks, [[User:Kdbuffalo|ken]] ([[User talk:Kdbuffalo#top|talk]]) 20:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

User:Worm That Turned, or another admin, could you please review this request? I would be most grateful. Kind regards, ken (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)