Talk:List of reunifications

hfe hallpch na wie gehts?

unification and reunification! there is a difference.

I split up the section on completed reunifications into one section on complete reunifications of divided nation-states and put the other entires on the "unification" processes of Italy and Bulgaria into a section on unification processes. There are significant differences - politcally, historically, and legally between the reunification of countries that once formed a united entity but were eventually divided (post WW2-Germany, Yemen, Vietnam) and the formation or gradual amaligamation of various states to form a new nation (Italy, Imperial Germany, Bulgaria, etc.). After all there is a reason why the (re-) prefix is added to form reunification. I reccomend the current form be maintainted unless somebody has arguments to the contrary. --Westee 14:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough, I was only suspicious of possible vandalism since Poland was initially removed. Sorry for my gut reaction, I'm fine with the distinction. —Nightstallion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 12:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I've "reunified" these two sections. Wihle I appreciate the thinking behind it, I found the division confusing until I read the Talk: page (not everybody does that). I hope my intro comment and supply of dates is adequate compensation. This is a disambiguation page, not a discussion of "reunification" as a diverse concept. I've also implemented some of the Disambiguation style guidelines. jnestorius^(talk) 05:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Strange additions

• Armenian unification (joining Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Western Armenia)
• Azeri unification (joining Azerbaijan and South Azerbaijan)

If anyone's got any sources on that, I'd be highly interested. —Nightstallion (?) 20:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)