User talk:Yeeno: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:42, 22 April 2017

Today is Monday, 6 January 2025, and the current time is 10:06 (UTC/GMT). There are currently 6,935,963 articles.
Purge this page for a new update.

This is Yeeno's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #34

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Moving Frame Productions

Moving Frame Productions should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Moving Frame productions is one of the most popular Film Making Institutes in Delhi, with more than 1000 students and its youtube channel has over 100 videos with over 1 million views.It is soon going to launch its branches in Mumbai and bangalore, it has over 100 members.Shashankmfp (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too speedy?

Hi Meiloorun, thanks for the work you do at new pages patrol. I was thinking that we should give editors a bit more time to fix their drafts and find sources, even if it's only half an hour. With 22 Savage, it was created at 00:36, 12 January and tagged during the same minute, which was on the fast side! Best, SarahSV ^(talk) 02:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SlimVirgin:I admit that I might be very fast at patrolling articles (as I spam that refresh button), but I believe the 22 Savage article didn't meet WP:bio, because a google search showed that news about 22 Savage was mainly trivial, mostly just comparing him as a doppelganger to 21 Savage. However I understand that speedy patrolling can cause problems (it has for me once), and I will be sure to slow down in the future. Cheers, Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 03:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol

Hi there,

Just letting you know I've removed the A7 tag from INSTITUTE_OF_COMPANY_SECRETARIES_OF_INDIA as it is prima facie an educational institution (see, e.g., the top level domain in the URL), which is not eligible for A7. Also, the page was tagged only 3 minutes after creation. Consider waiting about 10 minutes unless it's very obviously promotional, otherwise it is bitey. Cheers, Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me!} 05:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thompson.matthew:I know about how educational institutions are exempt from A7 and didn't know that this was an educational institution. However, I'm just wondering now why it was still deleted? Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page if you're interested. Cheers, Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me!} 05:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved at User talk:Thompson.matthew#INSTITUTE_OF_COMPANY_SECRETARIES_OF_INDIA

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Brian Lamping, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adam9007 (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2016, the project has:

Content

Feature interview: A brief look at Wikidata

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages
- Main project – talk
- Project category – talk
- Portal – talk
VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
- Reference library – talk
- Newsletter – talk
- Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2016, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages

Main project – talk

Project category – talk

Portal – talk

VG Project Departments

Assessment

Reference library – talk

Newsletter – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Vivek Misra

Hello Meiloorun. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vivek Misra, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. So Why 21:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Narrowrooms

Hello Meiloorun. Just to let you know I declined the speedy you put up for [WP:A3|CSD A3]] on Narrowrooms. There is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, and we should wait at least 10-15 minutes. That being said, Narrowrooms didn't fit CSD A3, but much better fit CSD G2 which is for test pages. It's really not that big of a deal, it is just nice to put the correct notice on the new user's talk pages, so they know what they did wrong, and how to fix it in the future, so that we don't bite the newbies. Thanks, happy editing, and keep up the good work. {MordeKyle} ☢ 02:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Yeeno,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 815 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Animation Imprint is....

Thanks for your direct message, but specifically AI talks about two teenagers who worked hard to get where they are, not about being on wikipedia, if anything it would be an honor just to be NOTICED on the website. I hope you reconsider... this would bring a lot of joy to the people who watch Animation Imprint. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animation Imprint (talk • contribs) 02:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Texas Toe

Hi Meiloorun. As a long time Wikipedia contributor and reader, I appreciated what you do, there would be no Wikipedia without people like you. I do contest your deletion of my article on the Texas Toe however. I live in Northern Vermont and I know we don't rank much to the rest of the US. However in the post analysis of the NFC championship, a local sports ancher discussed the maneuver of the Texas Toe on air (live). I found the description so compelling that I have kept it in my back pocket. IT has proved critical during this superbowl and so I thought it deserved a wiki page as something people are talking about, I can't go downtown without the Texas Toe being mentioned (I'm sure it will be worse now that the Super Bowl has demonstrated the value of the maneuver). I am an old man and I am sorry if I did not write my article to WIKI standards, please help me make it correct according to the standards, I only want to help world knowledge, and I am thrilled to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaBjork (talk • contribs) 02:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DaBjork: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. If this maneuver actually exists, and talk about it is growing, we'll have to wait for a bit until it is covered by some reliable news sources. Right now a Google search for it turns up absolutely nothing, so we'll have to give it some time. If you have any other questions, please ask them here! Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 04:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have any other questions per se but I will say the texas toe is the talk of the town in Stowe tonight! is it acceptable to expunge knowledge because we don't have a website? I'm sorry that we don't meet your standard of credibility, but I thought that since no one is claiming otherwise our small town wisdom would be at least accepted if not embraced. I'm sorry that our contribution to human culture rings false to you, i really am. Let me know if I can be of further service.

I would further point out that Google is not the arbiter of what is important to humans. Zero google returns does not mean zero value #goNewEngland #weAreStillHere #ruralUSA — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaBjork (talk • contribs) 04:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are people who look up the Texas Toe disappointed? yes if they know what it means. That is unfair.

@DaBjork: Please keep this in mind. According to the general notability guidelines,

Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article.

Therefore if there is no proof of it, it cannot be on Wikipedia. This is why we need to give this time, or for the time being it is considered a hoax. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your message for tag new article Roy Tan for deletion

Hi I am new to this so not sure if this is right place to communicate. I got a message indicate that you have tag a new page i created for deletion, due to copyright concerns. I want to clarify the nay content used from roytanmusic.com for bio of musician Roy Tan is used with permission. You can contact the site via "Contact" on its website if needed. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccutequeen (talk • contribs) 06:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ccutequeen: Welcome to Wikipedia. Your page Roy Tan is still a direct copyright violation of https://roytanmusic.com/about/ because you can clearly see at the bottom of the about page that it says ©2017 ROY TAN MUSIC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

According to Wikipedia's copyright guidelines,

...copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation.

Roy Tan's site is not licenced under creative commons or in public domain, so Wikipedia cannot accept text from his website. Also if you disagree with the deletion, please do not remove the tag, just click on the "contest this deletion" button and write your reasons. It will then be resolved by an admin.

If you have any questions, please continue to ask them here. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 17:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My page was flagged a speedy deletion and I need help recovering all the lost text I made over the last 3 hours... This seems very unfair and frusterating

I just made a wikipedia page called "Dice or Cards" for the last 3 hours and it was automatically flagged for a speedy deletion error as vandalism.

I clicked the button to "contest the deletion" and wrote a response, but it ended up rewriting my entire page and loosing all the work.

I am a wikipedia donor, and I am furious with how this ended up. I would like help recovering all my lost edits ASAP.

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeroe3 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeroe3:What you must understand is that all content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. If there is no proof it happened, then it can be considered a hoax, as in your situation. The "contest this deletion" button adds a statement to your talk page to be reviewed by an admin. It does not affect your article. Please read over Wikipedia:Verifiability before creating your next article. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chhut Khay

Dear Meiloorun, Chhut Khay is a famous Cambodian writer. Friendly yours, Domrey Sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 09:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Savage

Hi Meiloorun

I fixed the [awkward] on the Ronald Savage article down on the Controversy section and wanted to see if you can delete your [awkward] placed, it reads now→- In 2011, then a New York State Democratic Committeeman for the 76th Assembly District, Ronald Savage stated by the New York Daily News was paid back by Bronx Boro President Ruben Diaz Jr. which savage was not reappointed back to local Community Board #9 in the Soundview area of the Bronx, N.Y. by Diaz, because Savage helped Charlie Ramos (a candidate for senate) in the 2011 September primary elections against Ruben Diaz Jr's father New York state Sen. Ruben Diaz Sr.[awkward][11]

Street sting (talk) 01:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Street sting:Did you mean Diaz avenged his father by not reappointing Savage? By the way, you don't need to ask me to remove the tag, you can be bold and remove it in this case. Cheers, Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 02:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, great, I will use that saying: Diaz avenged his father by not reappointing Savage, then remove the tag... again thank you for all your help with this article, it has come a long way :) Thanks Street sting (talk) 03:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chhut Khay

Dear Meiloorun, what happens ? I don't understand. Chhut Khay is a famous Cambodian writer. What's the problem exactly? The administrators didn't answer me. Best, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 04:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Domrey sar: You may still work on the article while an admin gets to you, so you don't need to keep removing the tag. Please take a look at WP:Notability and make sure to add sources to prove that the subject is notable. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 04:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chhut Khay

Ok. Thank you for your answer, Meiloorun.

But why did your remove my edits ?

01:39, 17 February 2017‎ Meiloorun (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,364 bytes) (-2,937)‎ . . (Reverted 24 edits by Domrey sar (talk) to last revision by Meiloorun.

I don't know how to put it back ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 04:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Domrey sar:Sorry, that was an accident on my part. I will restore the edits. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 04:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have problem since your Speedy deletion nomination of Chuth Khay

Dear Meiloorun, I'm a specialist of Cambodian literature. I wrote few texts in Wikipedia, about "Soth Polin", "Khun Srun" without any problem. When I started the text about "Chuth Khay", I suddenly received your Speedy deletion nomination of Chuth Khay. My work is a serious work with good references, sir. Since your deletion nomination, I cannot edit anything (I tried with "khun srun" and suddently somebody told me I was vandalizing Wikipédia!!!). I'm very upset and very sad. I don't know what happened. Maybe, I'm not considered as "faithfull" anymore because of your speedy deletion nomination. I tried to contest the delation 4 times but without any answer. Could you please help me? Could explain everything to the administrators, please, so I can go on with my work. Best regards, Domrey Sar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domrey sar (talk • contribs) 07:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

....Delete of a page just created

Hi,,,,I just created the page for Anders Hunstad that you just deleted,,,,can you tell me what was missing?Elys75 (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Doodle Army 2: Mini Militia) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Doodle Army 2: Mini Militia, Meiloorun!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Yeeno,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 815 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit?

Hello, Meiloorun - could you please explain why you reverted my edit at Mia Rose Frampton? Thanks in advance. __209.179.9.46 (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@209.179.9.46: You removed an entire section without explaining why. Even if is unsourced you should try to improve it instead of simply removing the entire section. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying but I'm confused. What part of, "Removed plagiarized material - DO NOT REVERT - see Talk page," did you not understand? Especially after you read the Talk page? __209.179.9.46 (talk) 01:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using WP:HUGGLE, I can't see that, so it is better next time if you put what you are doing in the edit summary. This allows other editors to know what you are doing right away, so it is easier to understand. I apologize for any confusion this caused. I will remove the copyrighted content again. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 02:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

too Speedy

(Personal attack removed) from User:Brown Umoinyang -- Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 03:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brown Umo

Helloooooo Meilbourne I notice you mark the page Brown Umo for speedy deletion, I don't understand why and yes i am angry. I am still gathering information and sources to complete my work but you? I don't understand at all All I am Asking more time, a little time, I just want to see my work up there nothing more, and I think you should fast to teach people how to go about their work not kill it. Thanks and i love you. Yes you. Don't mind that I was angry and i am still — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brown Umoinyang (talk • contribs) 01:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brown Umo

Hello Mei I am sorry I used the wrong words. Honestly I need your help, I dont know how to use wikipedia template to edit my work. please help out, I am sure you will love what I am writing about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brown Umoinyang (talk • contribs) 01:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Brown Umoinyang: If you want to work on something long term, you might want to consider Wikipedia:Articles for creation, where you can work on an article and submit it for creation. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 01:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article tagged for speedy deletion - what could be improved

Hi, Meiloorun, thank you for checking quality of so many Wikipedia articles. Cardinity article was marked for speedy deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. I have created the article based on structure and types of information provided in already approved articles of similar comapanies. Could you provide criteria on which importance of the subject could be measured? Having that I could possibly correct existing article or at least do not create low value articles in future. Indresi (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Indresi: The notability criteria for companies is listed here. Your article has no independent third party, and relies on information from the company's website, and therefore doesn't prove its notability. If you would like, it is possible for me to move your article to Articles for Creation, where you can work on it and submit it to experienced Wikipedians for review. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 01:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Meiloorun: Yes, I would like to improve the article. It would be great if you could move it into "Articles for creation". Thank you for information and feedback! Indresi (talk) 10:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Indresi: It has been deleted now, but you can go to the Article wizard and create a draft there. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

contesting deletion of Helix studios

Hi Meiloorun,

My page creation of Helix studios is of a valid, existing organization, in the adult entertainment industry in gay pornography. I see no reason why it should be deleted. It is a valid organization and was not previously listed under 'gay pornography studios'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven02511 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Meiloorun, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Vanamonde (talk) 09:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Exablaze Post Deleted

Hi, you marked my page on exablaze for deletion within minutes of posting. I've tried to sound neutral in the post whilst not trying to sound promotional but I am new to Wiki. Can you please help me out with what to fix? Shanechand (talk) 02:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC) thanks, Shane[reply]

No idea why you deleted my article

Uh what is so inappropriate about the article i wrote? You must have a out of this world definition for an article of what I wrote to be "inappropriate". Jimmyboy123 (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimmyboy123: Your article was not "inappropriate" in any way, it just didn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for web content, therefore it was deleted under WP:A7.

Contesting deletion of DJsNeverEndingStory page

The deletion of this page was too speedy. DJsNeverEndingStory is the composer of the critically acclaimed spoken word pieces of Prince Ea. The musical pieces include, "Why I Think This World Should End", "Can We Auto-correct Humanity?", "Dear Future Generations: Sorry", and more. Dennis Preston's debut ambient EP, "The Harmony Epoch" debuted at #9 on Billboard's Top New Age Albums chart, as well as #1 on iTunes and #1 on Google Play. His work was featured on the TV seriess, "Unsupervised". He a cousin of The Pharcyde member, Romye Robinson (Bootie Brown). This information and more will be added to the Wikipedia page. Kristanguyen (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emotion Review

Hi Meiloorun

I am the one who set up the Emotion Review page, which you deleted because of copyright issues. I subsequently fixed the problem and the page is up now, but there is a problem. I named the pagNealash (talk) 02:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)e "Emotion review" instead of "Emotion Review" and I can't find out how to correct this.[reply]

Cheers Neal Ashkanasy Nealash (talk) 02:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nealash: I didn't delete the page, I just tagged it. About your question, I moved your page to the correct name. Anyone can do this, you can refer to Wikipedia:Moving a page for help. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 04:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:

Content

Interview with Coin945 and Deltasim about the edutainment video gaming genre

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages

Main project – talk

Project category – talk

Portal – talk

VG Project Departments

Assessment

Reference library – talk

Newsletter – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (It's open source News website for public. It's a reference this website provide Market News from all top media sources which is completely free and open source. It's non profit company. This article is not created for advertisement purpose or any other reason ) --Rnsharma1993 (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 295: / Line 295: @@
 [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=771657781 -->
+== Contested deletion ==
+This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (It's open source News website for public. It's a reference this website provide Market News from all top media sources which is completely free and open source. It's non profit company. This article is not created for advertisement purpose or any other reason ) --[[User:Rnsharma1993|Rnsharma1993]] ([[User talk:Meiloorun|talk]]) 06:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)