User talk:Gial Ackbar

Jayson Thiessen image

Would this image be better suited for the Jayson Thiessen article than the current one? The photo is mine, and was originally posted to my dA account here. If you think it should be cropped differently, feel free to do so. Dogman15 (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

@Dogman15: Yes, it is certainly better. Gial Ackbar (talk) 09:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Bronies

Oops, I'm sorry. I fixed it. Thank you. Federal Chancellor (NightShadow) (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Legends of Everfree

Canadian actor, Brian Doe, just confirmed via Twitter that he's going to have a role in the upcoming 2016 film "Equestria Girls IV: Legend of Everfree". I want to know if this kind of information would be acceptable to place on the "Development and production" section of the film's Wikipedia page. Is this type of info acceptable? { https://twitter.com/BrianJDoe/status/758104009982881792 } -Prince Silversaddle (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

@Prince Silversaddle: Maybe put in in a new section "Cast", along with other confirmed voice actors (like the Mane Six). Gial Ackbar (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit War Rages On, On All 4 EQG films' Wikipedia pages

I'm here to inform you that there's an edit war going on with the four EQG film Wikipedia pages between an anonymous user and user JSH-alive. -Prince Silversaddle (talk) 14:34, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I got that all on my watchlist. NO need to inform me. Gial Ackbar (talk) 16:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

EG is canon

I think you may have misunderstood Meghan McCarthy's meaning when she confirmed EG being canon to FIM. In some way, I understand what she mean, but I don't think she put some secret meaning when she said "in that". When she said "In that", she was simply meaning the event, like "Yes, in that event she went through the experience and learned something from it".

As for multiple sources that says that it's "canon", "Non-Canon" or "Left to our own canon". The only sources we have that are official say that it is canon, coming from Meghan herself who is currently working at Hasbro, so she knows more then anyone else.

When Meghan said that we could choose whether to include or dismiss it from our canon, she said, an I quote "You can choose and it won't go against your head-canon if you say no". Head-canon, meaning our own personal canon that is left to our own opinion, meaning her confirmation of EG being canon was accurate, but we can choose to ignore it if we wish, even though the fact of the matter is that it's canon.

As for sources that say it isn't canon, there are none, I've looked. One or two plot-holes in the story change nothing. We've had a few references from at least the first EG series, including a cameo appearance of a major character who seemed very familiar with the main characters.

And to prove this more, it was said that Hasbro hired the original staff and actors to maintain continuity with the show. Continuity, meaning to follow from where the show left off, which was Magical Mystery Cure.

Now I won't edit the page any further, but I think you're looking at what she said in a more complicated way than its tells us. Because I think you forgot when she answered "Yes" to the question of if it was canon to FIM.