User talk:Kudpung: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Here: reply to LeProf |
→in regard to the Miks C-Kellman article: new section |
||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
...should you care to read, is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jytdog#Tagging_acknowledged.2C_tag-bombing_and_other_misrepresentations_belatedly_denied.3B_reply_to_the_foregoing.2C_on_learning_of_it my response to the tagging Noticeboard issue], in which you recently expressed opinion. For fairness, and completeness. Your initial reply seems to have been based on a one-sided view of the matter, and so take a read if you care to understand all perspectives on this, in future. Cheers, ราตรีสวัสดิ์. Le Prof [[User:Leprof 7272|Leprof 7272]] ([[User talk:Leprof 7272|talk]]) 10:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
...should you care to read, is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jytdog#Tagging_acknowledged.2C_tag-bombing_and_other_misrepresentations_belatedly_denied.3B_reply_to_the_foregoing.2C_on_learning_of_it my response to the tagging Noticeboard issue], in which you recently expressed opinion. For fairness, and completeness. Your initial reply seems to have been based on a one-sided view of the matter, and so take a read if you care to understand all perspectives on this, in future. Cheers, ราตรีสวัสดิ์. Le Prof [[User:Leprof 7272|Leprof 7272]] ([[User talk:Leprof 7272|talk]]) 10:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
:Your posting there, {{U|Leprof 7272}}, after the close, was TL;DR and I didn't bother (along with, I imagine, many others) to read it. My concerns with your editing are not only about the current issue but also about AfC which raised concerns expressed by editors such as {{U|DGG}} and {{U|Primefac}} in the long [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants/Archive_1#LeProf discussion at AfC]. The community has spoken and I hope you will observe the outcome. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung#top|talk]]) 12:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
:Your posting there, {{U|Leprof 7272}}, after the close, was TL;DR and I didn't bother (along with, I imagine, many others) to read it. My concerns with your editing are not only about the current issue but also about AfC which raised concerns expressed by editors such as {{U|DGG}} and {{U|Primefac}} in the long [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants/Archive_1#LeProf discussion at AfC]. The community has spoken and I hope you will observe the outcome. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung#top|talk]]) 12:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
== in regard to the Miks C-Kellman article == |
|||
Hi, thanks for your comment. I have been studying the work of Miks C-Kellman for the past years. He is an inspirational figure and has impacted the lives of thousands of people across Europe and India. He truly needs a Wikipedia page. Doing a research on his work has also helped to do my university thesis. A lot of information on him is available in Latvian or Indian local languages, but a lot is also being produced in English. I am working on providing more and more references on daily basis and the milestones of his achievements. |
|||
Thank you for reviewing the page! |
|||
Revision as of 06:15, 1 May 2017
Please sign your message.
Status: Unknown 
 | Hi, welcome to my talk page!
 On line now? It is 6:19 AM where this user lives near Udon Thani, Thailand |
Archives
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Imagine a world where all the new page patrollers went on strike - please remain seated with your computers on until Wikipedia comes to a complete stop
 | This editor is on a Wiki leave which invariably happens around this time of the year. Responses here may be rare for the next few weeks. For urgent or important issues I can be contacted by email |
Here
...should you care to read, is my response to the tagging Noticeboard issue, in which you recently expressed opinion. For fairness, and completeness. Your initial reply seems to have been based on a one-sided view of the matter, and so take a read if you care to understand all perspectives on this, in future. Cheers, ราตรีสวัสดิ์. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 10:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Your posting there, Leprof 7272, after the close, was TL;DR and I didn't bother (along with, I imagine, many others) to read it. My concerns with your editing are not only about the current issue but also about AfC which raised concerns expressed by editors such as DGG and Primefac in the long discussion at AfC. The community has spoken and I hope you will observe the outcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
in regard to the Miks C-Kellman article
Hi, thanks for your comment. I have been studying the work of Miks C-Kellman for the past years. He is an inspirational figure and has impacted the lives of thousands of people across Europe and India. He truly needs a Wikipedia page. Doing a research on his work has also helped to do my university thesis. A lot of information on him is available in Latvian or Indian local languages, but a lot is also being produced in English. I am working on providing more and more references on daily basis and the milestones of his achievements. Thank you for reviewing the page!