User talk:Nerd1a4i

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Nerd1a4i. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 13:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Helm (author) (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Helm (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Nerd1a4i, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nerd1a4i! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ilka Agricola (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ilka Agricola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

List of Norwegian television series

In List of Norwegian television series, I would recommend keeping the shows listed under their original Norwegian titles, because few of them are known internationally under translated titles. If the shows do have established titles translated into English, those titles can be listed in the "Notes" column. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Stub tags

Hallo Heather, Please note that {{stub}} goes at the end, not the top, of an article, per WP:ORDER. And if you'd looked at the end of Barrow v The Master you'd have seen that it already has a specific stub tag, so does not need the general one to be added. Thanks. PamD 08:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

And {{stub}} doesn't take any parameters, so your "issues" was misplaced. PamD 08:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo again - same editor new name, a small surprise. Another issue about stub tags: please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like Giorgino which already has a specific stub tag. It puts it back into the category of stubs awaiting stub-sorting, and wastes other editors' time. Thanks. PamD 08:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

IPvandal 99.69.111.152 was reported to WP:AIV

Just thought I'd let you know that I reported him/her for multiple vandalism and ignoring of warnings. Thanks for taking care of his vandalism on Brownie for me. L3X1 (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work reverting vandalism! Keep up the great work -- Samtar talk · contribs 17:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Hasty CSD tagging

Hello Nerd1a4i. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at 2016–17 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149

The article referred to above is 2016–17 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season, which you tagged 2 minutes post its creation. The author added the page content later. 103.6.159.69 (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

A note about CSD A7

@Nerd1a4i: While patrolling new pages, I came across Undivided Friends, an article you tagged for speedy deletion as CSD A7. I just wanted to let you know that I removed your tag and replaced it with a proposed deletion tag. According to the criteria for speedy deletion, [t]his criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), software, or other creative works. Because this particular topic is about an upcoming short film, I do not feel CSD A7 would be applicable. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Have a great day! MJ94 (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Another note about CSD A7

I came across Alberto Pizzarello which you tagged for A7 speedy deletion; I have removed your tag. Significance is clearly asserted in the short article, so A7 does not apply. A very quick Google search reveals that Pizzarello is indeed a fairly well-known poet as indicated by the article. It is also inappropriate to request deletion of brand new articles only two minutes after they are created, we call this biting the newcomers and it's undesirable as it drives new editors away from the project. I see this is going to be the third warning you've received today regarding speedy deletion tagging; if you are not sure of what you're doing please slow down and consider asking questions at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol. Thanks. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 04:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Nerd1a4i, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. North America1000 06:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia's five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources • Topic notability What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content The community Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hidden Figures (book) has been accepted

Hidden Figures (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TimothyJosephWood 13:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for repairing my Article!

Hey, thanks for helping and repairing my article Clash-A-Rama, and fixing those tables. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Clash-a-Rama The article has progressed a lot (All thanks to you for creating the table). Please take a look and tell me if there is anything else to fix.HighnessAtharva (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 18:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Reginald Sanders

Hello Nerd1a4i, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Reginald Sanders, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. SoWhy 21:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for your dedication in carefully editing articles! JustBerry (talk) 23:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Nerd1a4i! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:52, Monday, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Castello (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberto Castello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply to edit on Article Yucatec Maya language

Hi! This is in reply to your undoing of a recent edit I made to Yucatec Maya language. The edit I made involved removing the reference to "British Anglo-Saxon". I did this as the term as it appears in the article is not technical. The term does not appear in the source cited and seems to have been originally introduced by the author to clarify the statement made in the initial clause of the sentence. However, the term "British Anglo-Saxon" has no linguistic meaning as "British" refers to a group of languages belonging to the Celtic language family and "Anglo-Saxon" refers to a specific Germanic language (an ancestor to our modern English). Combining the two produces a non-sense term which cannot be used in the manner the author seems to want to use it. My suggestion is that the final clause in this sentence be removed avoid any confusion or misinformation introduced by the presence of the phrase "British Anglo-Saxon". 209.6.204.215 (talk) 03:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Jalowiczor has been accepted

Peter Jalowiczor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Please restore the article 'vOICe' as it was previously

@Nerd1a4i:
Hi!
I saw that you edited the article 'vOICe' but did not post any comment.
After you, NewYorkActuary declined the submission. I am irritated by the entire submission ordeal.
Please restore the article to its previous version to the form it was in when I edited last.
I will not further submit the article for review, but keep it as my notes.
I don't possess the expertise to restore my article to its earlier version.
Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Bkpsusmitaa, please stop editing your post - it keeps showing up in one's notifications box, and it is rather annoying. I have read your message; see the talk page of Draft:vOICe for my response to your help request and also this message. Thank you. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CD Choice Music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Puja and Farabee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Stub category

Please don't add Category:Stubs manually as you did here: it just confuses things. The stub templates add the appropriate categories automatically. Thanks. PamD 09:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Jalowiczor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Jalowiczor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Jalowiczor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girazmach Nadew Wereta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NGC 507, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Dreyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

my edits to Peter Jalowiczor

Hi @Nerd1a4i: I wanted to inform you that I have edited the research section in Peter Jalowiczor. I discuss my rationale on the article's talk page. Given my vote to redirect the article, I have also posted a disclaimer on the AfD discussion page announcing the fact that I made significant edits to the article. In my judgment, these edits retained the critical information about his research and organized them more logically, but I would be pleased to discuss them with you if you disagree. Best, Astro4686 (talk) 10:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)