Jump to content

Talk:Nick Knight (photographer): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Event order: acknowledge
Line 44: Line 44:


==Event order==
==Event order==
{{request edit}}
{{request edit|A}}
The two last paragraphs of the "Life and career" section should maybe be switched as the current penultimate sentence is mentioning an event that took place in 2016 others mention events that took place in 2001, 2003, 2011 and 2013. This should probably be chronological. Thanks
The two last paragraphs of the "Life and career" section should maybe be switched as the current penultimate sentence is mentioning an event that took place in 2016 others mention events that took place in 2001, 2003, 2011 and 2013. This should probably be chronological. Thanks
[[User:Tom.zambaz|Tom.zambaz]] ([[User talk:Tom.zambaz|talk]]) 16:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Tom.zambaz|Tom.zambaz]] ([[User talk:Tom.zambaz|talk]]) 16:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
:That makes sense; {{done}} Thanks agaon {{reply|Tom.zambaz}}. &mdash; [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' semper crescis, aut decrescis'''''</sup></span>]] 16:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)



{{reflist-talk}}
{{reflist-talk}}

Revision as of 16:56, 17 May 2017


Untitled

See Talk:Nicholas deBrabant/Nick Knight for a Requested move of Nicholas deBrabant/Nick Knight to Nick Knight. The move request says "The character is commonly known among fans as Nick Knight. However, there is at leat one other article dealing with an athlete named Nick Knight, so a disambiguity page will have to be made." Celtic Knight.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to submit Trunk Archive as an external link. Trunk Archive is the image licensing agency that represents his photography archives. Where there are links to online galleries and his personal website, it is appropriate and necessary to add Trunk Archive, who handles his photos in syndication and also serves as a more comprehensive gallery to his body of work.

There is a log-in for users that set up an account, but also a general view to the public that requires no log-in at all accessible through "view archive". Thank you. 74.8.187.218 (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - There are already two links to his official site, as well as his business site. If users's should be directed to some affiliated website, they can find it through the official one. TimothyJosephWood 13:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Publications

Nick Knight published his first book whilst at Bournemouth and Poole College of Art. The publication, entitled Skinhead, compiles a series of documentary photographs of London’s skinhead gangs accompanied by essays, discography and fashion illustrations of skinhead youth cult from the 1960s by Jim Ferguson.[1]87.224.12.226 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - The work is already listed under his publications section, and the part about his career. The article does not need a digression into a blurb every time a work is mentioned. TimothyJosephWood 13:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plant Power

In 1992 Knight took a year long break from fashion photography to work on an exhibition at Natural History Museum, London with the British architect David Chipperfield. The exhibition was called Plant Power and was on the theme of the relationship between humans and plants.[2] The exhibition was on show in the Natural History Museum, London for 15 years[3].

 Done Nice one; thanks. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 16:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Event order

The two last paragraphs of the "Life and career" section should maybe be switched as the current penultimate sentence is mentioning an event that took place in 2016 others mention events that took place in 2001, 2003, 2011 and 2013. This should probably be chronological. Thanks Tom.zambaz (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense;  Done Thanks agaon @Tom.zambaz:. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 16:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References