Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gramjames: Difference between revisions
Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) Marking case as closed |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===28 May 2017=== |
===28 May 2017=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Gramjames and L'Hollister are clearly the same editor. Hollister created their account and started editing and removing maintenance templates within hours of Wesley warning Gramjames. I'm very tempted to duck them, but as it has been requested, I'll wait for the CU report, [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC) |
Gramjames and L'Hollister are clearly the same editor. Hollister created their account and started editing and removing maintenance templates within hours of Wesley warning Gramjames. I'm very tempted to duck them, but as it has been requested, I'll wait for the CU report, [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
*I blocked two newer account, the CU is not needed. Jane grierson is very stale, so might be a different person. Case closed. '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<font color="008B8B">Vanjagenije</font>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<font color="F4A460">(talk)</font>]]''' 15:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 15:35, 28 May 2017
Gramjames
Gramjames (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gramjames/Archive.
28 May 2017
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- L'Hollister (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Jane grierson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Gramjames (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Jane Grierson originally created the BLP article on Graham Dalby, which appears to be copied over from a draft version on WikiVisually. Gramjames (who is clearly the person on whom the article that Jane created) then creates an article for on the London Swing Orchestra, an orchestra which he works for.
I tagged the article with COI and various other issues, following a comment the user left at Kudpung's talk page. L'Hollister then removes the COI tag, in what appears to be a WP:SCRUTINY manoeuvre.
As Jane Grierson has not made any edits for a while, it is quite possible she may show as stale. But the other two users are clearly socking or meat puppeteering. Wes Wolf Talk 01:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Gramjames and L'Hollister are clearly the same editor. Hollister created their account and started editing and removing maintenance templates within hours of Wesley warning Gramjames. I'm very tempted to duck them, but as it has been requested, I'll wait for the CU report, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- I blocked two newer account, the CU is not needed. Jane grierson is very stale, so might be a different person. Case closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)